preview

Ethics And Ethics Of Care

Decent Essays

Ethics of care can be defined as “a normative ethical theory often considered a type of virtue ethics. Dominant traditional ethical developed ethical theories based on an understanding of society as the aggregate of autonomous, rational individuals with an emphasis on rules, duties, justice, rights, impartiality, universality, utility and preference satisfaction; care ethics, on the other hand, developed based on the understanding of the individual as an interdependent, relational being and emphasized the importance of human relationships and emotion based virtues such as benevolence, mercy, care, friendship, reconciliation, and sensitivity.” The author divided the article into three sections: first, the analysis of Avishai Margalit’s argument …show more content…

Ethics as defined in the journal is concerned with human relations of loyalty and betrayal; it involves the community and a smaller geographic space. Memory is the one that holds together a community and identify themselves as one. Sharing memories, common language, and norms make people who have never met come to think of themselves as part of a community. Morality, on the other hand, is concerned with human relations of respect and humiliation. It is said to be a universal phenomenon and more global. It related to a judgment of more global atrocities, such as crimes against humanity. We need morality to overcome our natural indifference towards others. Even if we show sympathy, morality is a guide behavior towards we are connected by virtue of common humanity. Thick ethics of memory relates to a concept of care, it is composed of bonds of community and collective …show more content…

It argued that memory includes an element of forgetting. It is impossible for us to remember everything with equal weight. Remembering a unique event, such as the Holocaust, it becomes linked to a specific narrative that is selective. Giving much emphasis on the Holocaust blocked the memory of the al Nakba, a particularized memory of the Palestinians. It was not only the destruction of Palestine, but of the memories and names of Palestine. Maragalit refers to it as a double murder, to be killed not only in body but in name. Memory is also said to have the possibility to be institutionalized and influenced by emotions. In the last section, the author used the feminist argument of the ethics of care. It is to acknowledge the existing boundaries of moral and political life often omit the concerns and activities of the relatively powerless. We need to remember that we humans are interdependent. Awareness and recognition both the Holocaust and the al Nakba are essential to the ending of the struggle and start a process of reconciliation. The author has shown its consistency with Margalit’s argument that memory is the condition for caring, and the absence of the former suggests the absence of the

Get Access