preview

European Imperialism: The Scramble Of Africa

Good Essays

Scramble For Africa It was 1850. The Europeans enhanced their chokehold over their Asain Dominions and proxies, and the indiginous peoples of Oceania were wiped out. However, Africa still was left quiet. Passed by the British ships en route to the Orient, Africa was relatively untouched by the enticing fruits of European imperialism. The slave trade, formerly a lucrative business in West Africa, was banned by the powerful British, and most of the population was not under colonial rule. While Africans were certainly aware of the European presence on their continent, and vice-versa, the two groups mostly kept to themselves. Other than the occasional traders and explorers, Africa was the continent most devoid of European Imperialism. Europeans …show more content…

In Africa, the French, British and German had direct jurisdiction over their colonies, but some colonies were owned by private companies. Later public outcry led to the nationalization of these companies, thus putting Africa in the direct hands of the great powers. Despite the great resources available in Africa, the colonies in Africa were more often regarded as important pieces in a geopolitical power struggle than flagship economic colonies. Because of the compartively primitive nature of the colonies in Africa, racial bias grew, and once again, Africans were regarded as subservient to Europeans. The partitioning of Africa and relatively Primitive technology and way of life amongst the native populace only served to strengthen and reinforce these biases. In South Africa, in fact, the native people were relegated to reservations, and given no rights. The Scramble for Africa had the unfortunate side effect of tarnishing the reputation of African people and reinforcing racial …show more content…

By partitioning all of Africa into spheres of influence, the Europeans fulfilled their imperial desires of ruling the world; however, the Scramble for Africa was only a small part of the larger power struggle between the European powers. In fact, one could argue that the Scramble for Africa was one of the most peaceful examples of imperialism as there was not any war between the powers themselves. The Berlin Conference was one of the few times the European Powers concurred (mostly), and this allowed for Africa to quickly be turned into a dominion of the Europeans. However, the Scramble for Africa most certainly did not help The native populace. The natives were seen as subservient and conquered people, and the fact that the Scramble for Africa was a power struggle at its core meant that Africa was still not allowed to become very developed or industrialized. Additionally, the simplification of the complex tribal system in Africa into 5 or 6 spheres of European influence is actually the root of the much of the warfare and unrest in Africa today. The Scramble for Africa was a showcase of the power of Imperialism, and while in the short term, it benefited the European powers, the long term effect was exceptionally negative for the African people. Imperialism never helps the conquered, as its purpose is to help the mother country. The Scramble for Africa was Imperialism's

Get Access