Eval-Sim

Performance Evaluations are a headache to many managers in the employment community. They can make it difficult to have a great workplace connection. In addition, they make it hard to accomplish goal performances. The performance evaluation system is a dislike process by em-ployees and their supervisors. According to Chan & Yung (2002), “The performance evaluation is quite subjective since it relies on the individual judgements of supervisors who have different per-ceptions of the process performance” (p. 237).

A performance appraisal is a key element in organization and can be one of the greatest tools used to record employee production. Organizations can establish their goals and objectivities, while involving the employees in the process. Conducting a performance appraisal increases productivity and morale and can prove to be effective in performance production.

Officer McCown, this is your 12 Month Probationary Employee Performance Appraisal. I have not been your supervisor for this entire evaluation period. This appraisal reflects the observations made by myself as well as Sgt. Mellott B0058. This evaluation includes input from your Employee Performance Notes and Blue Team. During this period you have been assigned to Lower Buckeye Jail on Shift 2.

The purpose of an annual performance evaluation is to promote communication and provide useful feedback about job performance, to facilitate better working relationships, to provide a historical record of performance and to contribute to professional development ( ). In June of 2018, I will have been out of high school for eighteen years. Since my high school graduation I have worked consistently in the health and human services field. Throughout my employment history I have been everything from a Executive Program Director to support staff and everything in between. This broad spectrum has allowed me to experience both, what I believe to be, the best and the worst in performance evaluations processes.

The purpose of a performance appraisal is to be used to improve employee performance. It should be used as a guide for recognizing outstanding behavior that is in line with departmental policies and work objectives, but should also be used as a tool for feedback to improve observed employee deficiencies. Performance appraisals should never be a surprise when it is presented to the employee. It is important for subordinates to understand what they are being evaluated on and what it takes to be successful.

The performance appraisals process is flawed in many ways. Lack of preparation, time, training, and professionalism are a few examples of how the system is flawed. The individual completing the application often has many tasks that supersedes taking the appropriate time necessary to accurately keep notations of an employee's performance throughout the year. The lack of time leads to an employee receiving a performance review on the most recent accounts of his or her job performance instead of his or her performance throughout the entire year. Lack of professionalism can also hurt the appraisal process. An employee should be rated by his or her job duties instead of the personal opinion or feelings the manager or supervisor completing the form. All

Rating against a standard permits a supervisor to classify employee performance independently from that of other employees. Both supervisor and employee have a reference point for accurately looking at an employee’s long-term performance growth.

Performance evaluations are important parts of all employees and managers tools to ensure positive actions are rewarded while negative actions can be evaluated and fixed to decrease problems in the future. Performance evaluations benefit supervisors and employees by identifying how to bring out the employees best attributes for the company (Hamlett, nd.). Evaluations provide a look at how a worker is doing compared to earlier reviews of their skill, knowledge, initiative and participation in the company’s vision (Hamlett, nd.). Introducing performance review evaluations is important to most organization for the success of their organization and the advancement of its employees. Performance evaluations provide a way for managers and supervisors to manage the performance of an organization and the people who make of the human resources of the organization (McCarroll, nd.). When implementing a new system it is important to understand the process must be realistic, challenging, yet attainable for performance expectations and standards to be successful for employees and the organization (McCarroll, nd.). Balanced scorecards are utilized in performance evaluations to essentially provide a way for organizations to align their strategic plans with day to day operations (Balanced Scorecard Institute, 2015). Balanced scorecards look at traditional financial measures, which are past events and long-term investments like

There are two stakeholders in this appraisal form, the employee and the manager. Bob was given the form to complete the employee comments, and then Al filled in the supervisor comments. The form has done a good job of defining Bob’s competencies as an employee. The form touches on knowledge/know-how, communication skills, work results, work style, service orientation, additional performance attributes, and gives an overall success rating. By defining Bob’s skills, abilities, experiences, and performance levels, Al can connect B

It also helps to highlight those areas in which the employee can be trained and it is also beneficial in the employee development. This appraisal method can be beneficial for those people who are in inferiority complex and underestimate themselves, to change their mindset and remain motivated after getting a positive feedback from their co-workers, bosses etc.

Organizations need to know who their best performers are.Within the context of formal performance appraisal requirements, rating means evaluating employee or group performance against the elements and standards in an employee 's performance plan and assigning a summary rating of record. The rating of record is assigned according to procedures included in the organization 's appraisal program. It is based on work performed during an entire appraisal period. The rating of record has a bearing on various other personnel actions, such as granting within-grade pay increases and determining additional retention service credit in a reduction in force.Note: Although group performance may have an impact on an employee 's summary rating, a rating of record is assigned only to an individual, not to a group.

Performance reviews are designed to both evaluate general performance and measure progress around specific goals. Both negative and positive aspects are incorporated in these reviews as they should serve as a point of reference to both look back in evaluation and ahead in anticipation. Pulling back from daily demands in order to assess and review employee performance allows managers to focus their attention on specific departments and clarify what is high priority to their company. Performance reviews also act as an opportunity to acknowledge working staff and identify professional development which will further support the staff members’ career growth. Reviews are seen as a powerful tool that can be tied to a company’s overall success;

There is a potential for bias with the appraisal system if the expectations of the appraisal are not understood or communicated clearly by the supervisor and the employee. In addition, if the appraisal system is not used in a fair, consistent manner, from year to year, or from employee to employee, this will lead to resentment between employees, low morale and decreased performance. All employees must be treated fairly and equally in the appraisal process. Supervisors must use a uniform appraisal system and apply it consistently over time.

European Journal of Social Sciences – Volume 7, Number 3 (2009) 2.2.1. Absolute Standards One group of appraisal methods use absolute standard. This means that employees compare to a standard, and their evaluation is independent of any other employee in a week group (Dessler, 2000). Included in this group are the following methods: the essay appraisal, the critical incident appraisal, the checklist, the graphic rating scale, forced choice and behaviorally anchored rating scales. The essay appraisal: It is the simplest evaluating method in which evaluator writes an explanation about employee’s strength and weakness points, previous performance, positional and suggestion for his (her) improvement at the end of evaluation term. This kind of evaluations usually includes some parts of other systems to cause their flexibility. This method often combines with other methods. In essay appraisal, we attempt to focus on behaviors (Mondy, 2008). The critical incident appraisal: It focuses on key factors which make difference in performing a job efficiently. This method is more credible because it is more related to job and based on individual’s

o Performance evaluations are formal review processes designed to encourage the informal day-to-day practice of performance management, while providing a framework in support of merit pay adjustments, promotion and employment decisions. Evaluating staff performance and helping employees develop their skills are important duties associated with performance management. Performance management begins with supervisors and employees collaboratively setting goals and standards, clearly communicating performance expectations and evaluating the results during the performance evaluation process.