Examination Is An Activity To Obtain Information, Clarification

The object of the preliminary investigation is to find out who can be a suspect or whom is the suspect of the of the crime whether or not there is enough evidence to begin any action.

Interrogation- questioning a suspect or witness by law enforcement authorities. Once a person being questioned is arrested, he/she is entitled to be informed of his/her legal rights, and in no case may the interrogation violate rules of due process.

He or she must be willing to adhere to all policies and procedures during the exam administration.

The purpose of this paper is to solidify the truths and purposes of the Presentence Investigation Report. The presence of the report itself is the solid proof of an individual that is utilized by the courts to justify sentencing. The report is a accumulation of information in a summary of the person being charged with a felony crime, breaking probation, and potential incarceration.

“These investigations are very important especially in criminal cases (highered.mheducation.com).” 1. “Double checking documents (highered.mheducation.com)”; Any and every document that has been made or collected through the investigation must be reviewed. This is to ensure that all facts are known in the case or to ensure that mistakes were not made. 2.

The interrogation process is one of the most important phases of the justice system. It demands many aspects such as, “the investigation of crime, the apprehension of offenders, the restoration of order, and the deterrence of future crime” (Police Interrogation and

Investigative questioning is interrogation between the time the suspect is arrested and taken to jail, and the officers will ask questions out of curiosity. Next, the Custodial interrogation will begin after the suspect is in custody inside an interrogation room. Custodial interrogation applies to the rules of the Fifth Amendment.

To be able to perform and document comprehensive and problem-focused physical examination, systematically and efficiently.

Examination. This is a process to extract and analyze the evidence. Extraction is the recovery of digital media. Analysis is the interpretation

Part of the preparation for the court case would happen throughout the entire investigation starting at the first day. As the team collected evidence, they documented the entire process in the document custody forms which created the chain of custody of each piece. This form is maintained throughout the process to prove that the evidence was properly handled and preserved (Nelson et al., 2015). The investigators also documented their investigational processes when analyzing the evidence. This would allow the team to retrace their steps and replicate their investigation if required (Nelson et al., 2015).

An researcher may inflate his self-assurance in the suspect’s responsibility, start a confuse cause for the interrogation, such as need to found the situation that led up to the offense, present outlook of

A medical examiner is a medical doctor who is in charge of examining bodies after the death of the person to determine the cause of death. These professionals are trained to investigate all deaths that may affect the public interest. They must determine the cause, the manner of death, and the circumstances surrounding the death of an individual. The medical examiner has to be able to determine whether death was a homicide, suicide, accident or other suspicious death. The medical examiner works with the police investigating the crime scene, and shows evidence in court. The medical examiner is part of both medical and legal sides of the investigation. When doing an autopsy, you first need to examine the body. Look around on the anterior and

To begin with, the author highlights how efficacy can be increased amid the investigative officers and how resources can be used to make investigations better. These are very important points because they assist a lot of people in a number of ways. Chiefly, the management of resources is perhaps the single biggest hurdle in management of investigations. Generally, investigations require a lot of funds to proceed. On the same note, they involve travelling and a lot of field

The main difference between the two is that an interview is nonaccusatory in nature whereas interrogations are accusatory. Interviews should be nonaccusatory even if the investigator has clear reason to believe that the suspect is involved in the offense or has lied to them. Another key difference is their purpose, the purpose of an interview is to gather information while, the purpose of an interrogation is to learn the truth. The people who are subjected to each also varies, by that I mean that an investigator should interview everyone involved, if possible, including victims, witnesses, and the suspect, while an interrogation should only be conducted when the investigator is reasonably certain of a person's guilt, meaning only suspects are interrogated. Interviews can be conducted in various locations and are free flowing and relatively unstructured. Interrogations should, ideally, be conducted in a controlled environment free from distractions, and involve active persuasion.

Interrogatories from the male employess who could attest to how Alice treated them. Since stated by Darren she was to assertive. Request for production of documents this would be need to prove the evaluations that were given to Alice.Request for a copy of Alice’s medical evaluations from her doctors.Document stating what Alice was bieng