In this paper, I will show how different philosophical viewpoints may lead to different outcomes about the knowledge of pain, with a focus on the philosophical viewpoint of skepticism. From skepticism, I will claim that a person can be wrong about whether they are in pain by exploring the roots of how one understands pain and what may cause pain. The first philosophical viewpoint to be addressed regarding the knowledge of pain will be skepticism. Many skeptics may state that no reason has been shown for why it is logically necessary that one must know whether they are in pain, and some may extend this argument further by saying that no reason exists. It then follows that it is logically possible to for one to be wrong about their knowledge of pain, but this is not sufficient to proclaim that one may be wrong about their …show more content…
With the commonly used notion of pain in speech, many skeptics would perhaps hold the claim that pain is exterior of the mind, to be true and then question what could be the cause of pain if pain originated from the mind rather than the body. An example of mental pain can be seen in the preceding paragraph where a person felt pain during a hallucination and the cause of this pain was one's imagination. Another commonly occurring example of mental pain is sadness. If a person is feeling sadness then they are feeling mental pain because pain and sadness are synonymous with each other and this pain originates from one's reason. In developing an argument for why a person may be wrong about whether they are in pain the issue of mental pain must be addressed directly because mental pain does originate from the senses, and the primary reason for why one may be wrong about their knowledge of pain cannot be because of the deception of their
1. It is important that we take into consideration, areas other than physical pain and have an holistic approach. Pain is whatever the person who is suffering it feels it to be. Physical pain can be experienced as a result of disease or injury, or some other form of bodily distress. For example childbirth. Although not associated with injury or disease, but can be an extremely painful experience. Pain can also be social, emotional and spiritual as well as just physical.
The psychological processes in the article include pain perception, and how we as humans perceive pain, how we react to it, and how we adapt to it. The article explains the pain signaling process and how pain can be amplified. For example, when we get pricked by a needle, a signal from our finger ascends through the spinal cord to reach parts of the brain. From there, we perceive pain, then we form a pain experience. Pain perception can be resulting from several factors such as the frequency of pain input, how sensitive the CNS is, How the body reacts after brain perceives and tries to send information to the injured area. A pain experience is when we have the urge to put a band aid on our injury, or be scared to get pricked from a needle again. However, each pain experience differs from one culture to the other, moreover, one person to the other. The article is conducting a research paper about pain and pain perception in different ethnic groups.
Pain is not only defined as a sensation or a physical awareness, but also entails perception. Moreover, pain is an unpleasant and an uncomfortable emotion that is transferred to the brain by sensory neurons. There are various kinds of pain and how one perceives them is varied as well. Certain parts of the brain also play a key role in how one feels pain such as the parietal lobe, which is involved in interpreting pain while the hypothalamus is responsible for the response to pain one has. Although some believe pain is just a physical awareness and is in the body, pain is all in one’s mind because the perception of pain and the emotion that controls its intensity differs in individuals and when pain itself is administered to the body, the brain determines the emotions one attaches to each painful experience.
Gertler identifies pain as dissimilar to water in that the sensation is the same in appearance and in reality, but if pain cannot be separated from its location then, at the very least, the concept is not “sufficiently comprehensive.” Pain does not meet Gertler's requirement for a successful thought experiment, and ultimately fails to fit cohesively into her argument and support her conclusion for the possibility of pain without a physical state. If one's concept of pain allows one to separate it from its location and accept the Disembodiment Argument, the physicalists are right to conclude that one's understanding of pain is severely
This case shows a presentation of 'not the concept '. The similarities are present, but the contrary case is easily noted that it is not a representative of the concept of pain. Ms. Black is suffering from
Pain not only involves the physical reaction to damaged tissue, but also involves an emotional and cognitive response by the person experiencing the pain (Backer, 1994). A person's prior experience will influence how pain is managed. Pain is a signal that something is not
I support this idea of achieving absolute pleasure from the removal of all pain due to a series of corresponding reasons. The first factor addressed in support of this claim is the tendency of human nature to focus on the negative. This observation will lead to the second supporting idea that these distresses which culminate towards the feeling of pain often block out the feeling of the pleasure desired. This secondary notion results in a comparison between the subsequent uplifting experiences from the removal of pain as opposed to the effect of a simple everyday pleasure on the mind. I
First pain is an everyday experiences that is expressed through the use of language and is then legitimized (Waddie, 1996). If a patient as a history of depression or chronic pain they have pain every day and the concept is used to help explain their pain. As nurse we use the concept of pain to find a base line of the pain and to assess new pain. In surgical patients they may have multiple types of pain from the incision, emotional, and history. The concept educates the nurse of the different form that pain can present itself. Pain can also guide how we treat the patient. Emotional pain would not be treated with the “so know pain pills”, but with talking or listening to patient. Concept of pain also address the different form of patient and how the nurse and patient response to it. If a patient is having somatic pain from an incision the nurse could react by applying heat or ice. Pain is what the patient says it is.
To most people, pain is a nuisance, but to others pain controls their life. The feeling discomforts us in ways that can sometimes seem almost imaginable. These feelings can lead to many different side effects if not dealt with or diagnosed. These effects can include depression, anxiety, and incredible amount of stress. The truth about pain is that it is vital to our existence. Without the nervous system responding to pain, we would have no idea if we were touching a hot stove, being stuck by a porcupine’s needles, or something else that could leave a lasting effect upon our bodies without us even knowing anything about it.
Pain is basically an emotional experience within an individual that is linked to the body tissue damage. The main purpose of the pain is mainly to alert the body to react preventing severe damage to the tissues. All this comes because of nerve fibers sending a signal to the brain for interpretations. The basic understanding of pain is slightly diverted by Moseley’s argument. Moseley argues that pain is created by the brain as a way of protecting individuals. He further claims that if the brain notices some danger in any manner, it creates pain with an aim of protecting an individual's tissues from being damaged past a certain level. Furthermore, there can be no threats in certain situations, but the brain will still create some little pains.
In most cases, the actual basis or origin of the pain is the one being addressed by
‘Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage’ (International association for the study of pain 2014). Pain can be made up of complex and subjective experiences. The experience of pain is highly personal and private, and can not be directly observed or measured from one person to the next (Mac Lellan 2006). According to the agency for health care policy and research 1992, an individuals self-report of pain is the most reliable indicator of its presence. This is also supported by Mc Caffery’s definition in 1972, when he said ‘Pain is whatever the experiencing patient says it is, existing whenever he says it does’.
René Descartes was an extremely influential 17th-century philosopher and came up with many ideas that still persist to this day. One of those ideas was Cartesian skepticism, which states that “the view that we do not or cannot have knowledge in regard to a particular domain,” knowledge, in this case, is justified, true, beliefs. He first comes up with his idea of skepticism in the first part of his work “Meditations On First Philosophy,” aptly named “Of the things which may be brought within the sphere of the doubtful.” In his first meditation, he discusses his doubts with sensory illusion/error, possible dream states, and regarding deception by an evil demon. However, after dissolving his first two doubts, he gets stuck on the third and
Pain is something that connects all of us. From birth to death we can identify with each other the idea and arguably the perception of it. We all know we experience it, but what is more important is how we all perceive it. It is known that there are people out there with a ‘high’ pain tolerance and there are also ones out there with a ‘low’ pain tolerance, but what is different between them? We also know that pain is an objective response to certain stimuli, there are neurons that sense and feel pain and there are nerve impulses that send these “painful” messages to the brain. What we don’t know is where the pain
Concept analysis are particularly helpful in explaining ambiguous concepts (Rodgers & Knafl, 2000). Pain is defined in multiple ways. Also, pain has is associated with a lot of misconceptions. This concept analysis’ objective is to bring clarity and to provide a deeper understanding of pain.