preview

Fallacies In A Well-Constructed Argument

Decent Essays

In a well-constructed argument and debate there will most of the time be a logical fallacy in efforts to make the author win their side and show their reasoning and why they are right. In multiple articles and journals there will naturally be these fallacies. In the source that the whole essay would be about there are also a few logical fallacies throughout; some of which include ad hominem, appeal to ignorance, either or, and appeal to pity. While these fallacies in most cases work towards the purpose of the article; which is that of communicating the dreadful separation of families, little boys and girls from their mothers and fathers, which are left to vouch for themselves after the deportation of their parents, there is room for these fallacies to grow and capture the full aspect of the purpose of the source. …show more content…

In the article, "'I Can't Go Without My Son', a Mother Pleaded as She Was Deported to Guatemala" the author states, "Once their paths diverge in the labyrinthine system" (Jordan, p. 3) causing the development of an ad hominem. A not so common word in this excerpt and one that is very necessary for the attack to work is labyrinthine. This word according to the Oxford Dictionaries labyrinthine is a confusing and twisted system. This definition not only proves the personal attack from the author to the government but also shows her personal side on the government itself. The author shows how she is not on the side of the government and doesn't like their actions on the topic at hand. While this example is good at showing the attack to the government it could improve on showing that the twisted government is the causation of the separation of families reaching out to the direct purpose of the

Get Access