preview

Fannie Mae Case Study

Decent Essays

The congress has determined that the executive compensation system is unreasonable during the crisis in 2000s. Fannie Mae’s compensation committee was equally in effective. The committee allowed the company’s CEO, Franklin Raines, to select the consultant employed to design the mortgage firm’s executive compensation plan and agreed to a tiered bonus plan that would permit Raines and other senior managers to receive maximum bonuses without great difficulty. Raines receives $52 million in performance-based bonuses and $90 million in total compensation during 1999 and 2004. The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight found that Fannie Mae had cautiously overstated earnings to obtains bonus linked to financial performance. Securities and Exchange Commission also found evidence which indicates that Fannie Mae is involve in improper accounting and required it to restate its earnings between 2002 and 2004 by $6.3 billion. Moreover, Freddie Mac was also involved in manipulative accounting to receive bonuses. Freddie Mac’s CEO Richard Syron received $19.8 million in compensation while the mortgage company’s share decline from a high $70 in 2005 to $25 in the end of the year 2007. Fannie Mae’s compensation philosophy is that it should attract, retain, and reward the skilled talent needed to successfully manage a leading financial services company.
Compensation must be consistent with its charter, which require compensation plan to be realistic and comparable to the

Get Access