FASB Accounting Standards Codification:
410 Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations
Abstract
The purpose of this research paper is to summarize research on codification topic 410 based on the information found in different academic databases. The first part of the paper will focus on the FASB Codification database. The second part of the paper will compare and contrast three other databases on the same codification 410 within the RIA Checkpoint databases: AICPA: Auditing and Accounting Guides, SOX Reporter, and GAAP Practice Manual. A summary of benefits and issues with the searches of each database will also be discussed.
Codification 410 is divided into two subtopics, 410-20 and 410-30. Code 410
…show more content…
When I clicked on the pre-codification standards to find what FASB Pronouncements were listed for my topic, 410, I found the entire is of FASB Pronouncements. I couldn’t search for the applicable standard through a look-up; I had to scroll through the list to find a standard that pertained to my search. What I found was:
Statement No. 157 (Superseded) Fair Value Measurements (Issue Date 09/06)
[As Amended] [As Issued] [Summary] [Status](FASB, Other Sources, Pre Codifications Standards)
Table 1
FASB Accounting Standards Codification
Table of Contents
Collapse | Expand 410 Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations 10 Overall 00 Status General 05 Overview and Background General 20 Glossary 20 Asset Retirement Obligations 00 Status General 05 Overview and Background General 15 Scope and Scope Exceptions General > Entities > Transactions 20 Glossary 25 Recognition General > Background for Recognition > Fair Value Is Reasonably Estimated > Obligations with Uncertainty in Timing or
The FASB Accounting Standards Codification® is the source of authoritative generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities.
To aid us in our decision making process in the matter of determining the appropriate classifications in the statement of cash flows for the purchase and sale of EAs, we primarily used the Accounting Standards Codification
1. The inventory at your company consists of computer software that the company has developed and is selling. You capitalized (rather than expensed) the cost of duplicating the software, the instruction manuals, and training material that are sold with the software.
FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 805-20 (Business Combinations – Identifiable Assets and Liabilities, and Any Noncontrolling Interest) is applicable to our company’s transactions regarding the acquisition of ARU since our acquisition meets the definition of a business combination. Per ASC 805-20-05-1, it states this subtopic provides guidance on how the acquirer shall recognize and measure the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and noncontrolling interests in the acquiree. Therefore, this subtopic is applicable to our concern on the disclosure of the extinguishment of debt in financial statements. In addition, per ASC 805-15-2 and ASC 805-15-3, the scope and scope exceptions mention the guidance in this topic applies to all entities and all transactions that meet the definition of a business combination. Per ASC 805-20-50-1, it provides guidance on how our company shall disclose the business combination that occurs during the reporting period, as follows:
Note: General Note The Status Section identifies changes to this Subtopic resulting from Accounting Standards Updates. The Section provides references to the affected Codification content and links to the related Accounting Standards Updates. Nonsubstantive changes for items such as editorial, link and similar corrections are included separately in Maintenance Updates.
In 1973 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) was established to set the financial accounting standards in the United States of America for nongovernmental entities. These standards are collectively called U.S. Generally accepted Accounting Principles, or U.S. GAAP. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants acknowledge the authority of these standards (FASB, n.d). A “proven, independent due process” is used to collect the viewpoints of the financial statements prepares and users for the constant improvement of these standards. An Accounting Status Update(ASU) is not an authoritative source however documents the amendments to communicate the changes in the FASB Codification for a user to understand the reason and future of those changes (FASB, n.d).
Entity-wide disclosures are required under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 280-10-50-40 through 280-10-50-42. The disclosures are required because every corporation does not report information in a similar fashion, and the disclosures would provide comparability of the financial statements among entities. For example, if a corporation uses a geographic approach in its financial statements, disclosing certain information about the products or services sold will make comparability to other companies much easier. The disclosures will also help with comparability within an entity if they decide to choose another method of reporting operating segments in the future. There are three types of entity-wide disclosures; products and services, geographic areas, and/or major customers. Every public company has to comply with the disclosures, even if the company has one reportable segment. The only exception to the entity-wide disclosures is if it is impractical to provide the information, such as it would be extremely costly to the corporation, or if the “internal reporting systems are not capable of gathering financial information by product or service by geographic area.” A disclosure should be made when entity-wide disclosures are impractical.
* Accumulation of costs exceeds the amount expected for acquisition or construction of the asset
The FASB accounting codification is an advanced system that allows certified public accountants and other users to quickly access non-SEC authoritative content, perform relevant research, and submit timely and appropriate feedback. The FASB codification research system is a real-time, online database that allows users to access codification whose primary aim is to simplify the accessibility and structure of all authoritative generally accepted accounting principles, reduce the time and effort invested when researching accounting-related issues, decrease the risk of non-compliance with the generally accepted accounting principles, provide access to all authoritative information from a single place, facilitate the updating of accounting standards, and foster research and convergence efforts for the FASB (Wiley, 2017).
The FASB Accounting Standards Codification® is the source of authoritative generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied to nongovernmental entities.
The purpose of creating FASB is to establish standards of financial accounting that control the establishment of financial reports by nongovernmental organizations. This instance is identified as the number one authority by the SEC and the American Institute of Certified Public.FASB Accounting Standards Codification serves as a reference guide of authoritative standards for accounting and reporting, to be applied by nongovernmental organizations. Some examples are; ASC 830-230-55-1 that can identify as Statement of Cash Flows for Manufacturing Organization with Foreign Operations, ASC 926-330-35-1 can be justified as Products Held for Sale, ASC 954-440-25-2 identified as Continuing Care Retirement Community, ASC 505-20-50–1 means Equity, Stock Dividends and Stock Split and Disclosure, ASC 710-10-05-6 describe as Employees Compensations..
The documents that comprise GAAP vary in format, completeness, and structure. As a result, financial statement preparers sometimes are not sure whether they have the right GAAP; determining what is authoritative and what is not becomes difficult. In response to these concerns, the FASB developed the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification. The FASB’s primary goal in developing the Codification is to provide in one place all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic. Professional accountants pay for access to the FASB. The OU Accounting Department has paid for academic access to the FASB Codification. Our Login information is:
The Codification’s goal is to clarify the company of thousands of U.S. authoritative accounting announcements published by diverse standard-setters. Therefore, to accomplish this objective, the FASB sponsored a project to incorporate and typically adapt all related accounting publication announced by the standard-setters of the U.S. in conjunction with those of the FASB, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Not-for-profits entities (NFP) encounter multiple dilemmas in recognizing their revenue and expenses. The challenge to distinguish and assess whether certain not-for-profit revenue transactions are actually contributions or exchange transactions is one of those. Moreover, there are a diversity or multiplicity of factors or consequence to consider in evaluating transactions that meet the definition of a contribution i.e. is it really a contributions or an exchange, if it's a contribution, is it conditional or unconditional; is it an agency transaction, or a promise to give or an intent to give, and if it is a promise to give, whether the promise is legally enforceable or not. These evaluations frequently compel the choice to
The Financial Accounting Standards Board has issued for public comment two Exposure Drafts related to its disclosure framework project. The first exposure draft proposes amendments to Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts - Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting, Chapter 3 – Qualitative Characteristics of Useful Financial Information. The purpose of this proposed amendment is to clarify the concept of “materiality”. FASB defines materiality as, information is material if omitting it or misstating it could influence decisions that users make on the basis of the financial information of a specific reporting entity. In other words, materiality is an entity-specific aspect of relevance based on the nature or magnitude or both of the items to which the information relates in the context of an individual entity’s financial report. Consequently, the Board cannot specify a uniform quantitative threshold for materiality or predetermine what could be material in a particular situation.