preview

Female Genital Mutilation Paper

Decent Essays

In the case of 5 year of Beza undergoing Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) at a young age, I believe we should start by revisiting what exactly FGM is before inputting our opinion on this case. What is Female Genital Mutilation? There are three types of FGM that can be performed. The first being Clitoridectomy; is when part or the whole of the clitoris is amputated and the bleeding is stopped by pressure or stitching. The second type is Excision; both the clitoris and the inner lips are amputated. The bleeding is usually stopped stitching, but the vagina is not covered up. Lastly, the third type is infibulation; the clitoris is completely removed. Some or all of the labia minora are cut off, and incisions are made in the labia majora to create a raw surface. …show more content…

As we look back at the question, “is this case morally permissible?” I think we must consider that this procedure most likely received the permission by Beza’s parents because she is of a very young age to understand what exactly she is about to under also if asked for her consent, she would probably say yes not knowing what she has agreed to. I do believe that it is morally wrong for this procedure to take place to this 5-year-old girl, but I am in agreement with professor Martha Nussbaum from University of Chicago when she stated that,” it is morally wrong to criticize the practice of another culture unless one is prepared to be similarly critical of comparable practices when they occur in one’s own culture”. This is so true because someone can come back a question our culture when mother’s make the decision to have their sons undergo circumcision. That scenario can also undergo the same questionnaire and judgment that we are making when discussing FGM, so we are in the wrong for judging the cultural view of something the people within that culture believe is okay to

Get Access