------------------------------------------------- Case: Ferguson Foundry Limited (FFL)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Date: March 10 2013
To: Mark Ferguson, President
From: Carl Holitzner
Re: FFL’s Lower-Than-Budgeted Profit for the Fiscal Year Ended May 31 2010
The major issue is determining why Ferguson Foundry Limited’s (FFL) actual profit was $367,600 lower than budgeted, despite selling 2,000 more wood stoves (12,000 instead of 10,000 units). This will be explained using Variance Analysis to demonstrate the underlying reasons why the company failed to meet its president’s expectations. FFL profit for 2010 was below budget due to many factors both production and marketing related.
From a production perspective, there were 3
…show more content…
Unit Direct Labor (Basic) = DL Std. Qty. Per Unit x DL Std. Rate Per Hr. = 6 hrs. x $15.00 per hr. = $90
APPENDIX
EXHIBIT 2 | For the Year Ended May 31 2010 | | ACTUAL | FLEX-BUDGET VARIANCE | FLEX BUDGET | SALES-VOLUME VARIANCE | STATIC BUDGET | TOTAL VARIANCE | Quantity (units) | 12,000 | | 12,000 | | 10,000 | | Sales Revenue | $5,700,000 | ($300,000) | $6,000,000 | $250,000 | $5,750,000 | ($50,000) | Variable Costs | $4,515,600 | ($99,600) | $4,416,000 | ($181,000) | $4,235,000 | ($280,600) | CM | $1,184,400 | ($399,600) | $1,584,000 | $69,000 |
The company started off producing 20,000 units of mountain bikes. We did not change the production quantity. Last year our forecast sales were 24,000 when we only sold 19,866; therefore we thought it would be best to leave production at 20,000 bikes. Having excess inventory, we concluded that 20,000 units should be enough considering our quality has not changed and our advertising will not increase the sales dramatically. Although we had the choice to produce as much as 30,000 units, we felt as though we did not have sufficient money to increase production. We were interested in allocating the money towards marketing as opposed to production. We realized that without awareness, no matter how many units we make, sales would be inefficient.
This proves that the marketing strategy increased mid-week sales from 20% to 30%. This sales mix caused variances in the actual operating income and the budgeted operating income. The flexible budget, flexible-budget variances and sales volume variances provide further analysis into the profitability of the operations.
Although the company did show an increased gross profit of $8,255,000 with $6,358,000 less Net Sales in 2013 versus 2012, that increase is due to the reduction in product Cost of Goods Sold by $14,613,000. Since increases in product price will negatively affect sales, one of management’s primary goals is to keep prices stable. This objective is achieved through implementation of cost cutting programs, investing in more efficient equipment, and automation of more steps in the production process.
Management should note that the level of activity was above what had been planned for the month. This led to an expected increase in profits of $1,100. However, the individual items on the report should not receive much management attention. The favorable variance for revenue and the unfavorable variances for expenses are entirely caused by the increase in activity.
As we continue to move toward the end our quarterly objectives. I wanted to take the time to explain some of our costs. In our particular field of designing and manufacturing products, we are always engaging in ways that we can mitigate loss and improve our processes. Performing such changes will give a stronger presence in the market by allowing us to remain competitive.
Castillo Products improved from an operating loss in 2009 to profitability in 2010. The net profit margin went from negative to positive. The asset turnover (total-sales-to-total-assets)
11. Utilities and services standard output $150,000, actual output is $$218,000. This is a favorable variance of -$1777. This variance is due to reduce sales, less power at the plant is needed because less units are being made. 12. Research and Development standard output is $85,861, actual output is $82,841. This is a favorable variance of -$3,020. This variance is due to cut backs in R&D because of slow sales and low demand for new bikes. 13. Other General and Admin Expenses standard output $170,000, actual output is $172,000. This is an unfavorable variance of $2000. This increase is due to addition materials needed for advertising. 14. Other utilities and
2. Considering your answer to item 1, the first three exhibits, and related introductory discussion, is it likely that the accounting system may distort product profit significantly? Why? (Ignore general, selling, and admin expense.)
2. In 2008 the FCF will be -57817 followed by -12378 in 2009. Then in 2010 the FCF will finally be positive at 5939. The free cash flow will slowly increase so that in 2018 the free cash flow will be 12783. The free cash flows for all the years will be included in a table in the appendix. We think that his projections are realistic for a variety of reasons. The first reason they only plan to generate an additional $84,960,000 in the first year which is only 2.124% of the current private label industry. Given Hansson Private Label’s current position in the
Overhead costs include rent, office staff, depreciation, and other. Once the flexible budget was complete, variances between the actual and flexible budget could be calculated (Exhibit B). The variance for frame assembly was favorable with actual costs being $82,663 less than in the flexible budget. The variances for wheel and final assembly however were both unfavorable. Wheel assembly had an unfavorable variance of $50,650, while final assembly variance was the highest at an unfavorable variance of $231,200. Taking into account these three aspects of direct cost, direct cost has an unfavorable variance $199,187. Although most overhead costs are fixed, 2/3 of other costs are variable and increase with the increased production. As shown in Exhibit B, overhead variance is unfavorable at $60,000. The direct cost variance and overhead variable together lead to a total unfavorable variance of $259,187.
Define the Issues Chef’s Toolkit has exhausted all of their financial resources trying to develop their product. The owner, Peter Jeffery, is seeking external investment to fund the launch of his product, and the potential investor, Dale Reid, has asked for projected financial statements for the company’s pessimistic, expected, and optimistic projected sales for the first year of operation ending July 30, 1995. Analyzing the Case Data Fragmented information was given in the case, along with a balance sheet and a production schedule for the expected sales of 10,000 units. There was no statement of cash flows, income statement or any information about their cash account or their accounts payable
After closely reviewing the financial and production data, our accounting team has found that your traditional cost allocation is faulty and misleading. The costs of products A and C were over allocated and products B and D were under allocated causing deceptive information on the true profits of the company. Also, product B appears to be
|250000 indirect employees & 9000 vehicle for distribution). |position in profitability due to drop in prices by nearly 30% since 1950’s. |
Monmouth Inc. is a leading producer of engines and massive compressors used to force natural gas through pipelines and oil out of wells. It is has dependence on sales to the oil and gas industries, the earnings of which is fluctuated owing to cyclical nature of heavy machinery and equipment sales. Anyway, the company’s amount of earnings growth and sales are above average in long-term view. From the last three acquisitions the company adhered to only leading companies in their respective market segments. The fourth company on the list of acquisition was Robertson Tool Company.
There are quite a number of financial statements that are associated with the the food and beverage production and services system. These financial statements includes sales records, standard amount and the actual amount of foods and beverages that the establishment sells. The variance analysis is a good tool for planning and enables an establishment to have a grasp of the current costs of food items. Every food service manager must be concerned with the cost of foods including the cost related to the