|–– |
|[Financial Analysis of ANZ and NAB |
| Group Assignment |
| |
| |
| |
|
…show more content…
However, a lower P/E ratio can also be generated with one-off abnormal earnings (Phan, 2011).
In 2008, share prices dropped mainly due to the US sub-prime crisis, which started in 2007 (Lixi, 2008). This had a huge impact on the P/E ratio for 2008, which is slightly below the threshold of 10 times. The P/E ratio for ANZ was higher than NAB in 2009 and there was lesser fluctuation in ratio. Share prices tend to rise with improved economic conditions, and with stimulus packages being distributed all over the world, there was uplift in the global economy, hence driving share prices (Larsen, 2012). However, falling earnings over 2009 caused both P/E ratios to rise. NAB’s P/E ratio increased a significant amount and overtook ANZ’s. Over the 5 years, NAB’s P/E ratio fluctuation is observed to be consistently higher than ANZ’s. Moreover, NAB’s higher P/E ratio might be due to investors’ high expectations, which were not supported by earnings.
The P/E ratios returned to a more normal course in 2010 due to improved earnings (See Appendices 1). In 2011, earnings were higher than in 2010 but the drop in market share price caused P/E ratio to decrease again. This drop might be linked to concerns over the uncertainties around sovereign debt in Europe.
2) Return on Equity (ROE)
According to Forbes,
Absent information about investors’ earnings quality concerns, it is likely to be the case that most of the variation in P/E ratios is due to differences in growth opportunities and (to a lesser extent) risk.
According to Burgstahler and Dichev (1997), when earnings increases are consistent firms’ price-to-earnings are normally higher but when the trend is broken firms experience a negative growth in stock returns.
* The price earnings ratio has dropped by 5.510%, meaning that investors in 2009 were willing to pay slightly less per dollar of earnings than in 2008.
Horizontal analysis allows side by side comparisons on a year to year basis to determine the performance from one year to the next. The company decides on standards to compare the results of the analysis. Standards are researched by checking competitors, internet research of general industry guidelines or standards created from past experience in the company.
As of February 17, 2017 at 4:29 PM EST the price of a stock was 45.12 US Dollars with a 2.28% drop of price. Then P/E Ratio is currently at 18.54 and with current Earnings per Share value of .411. The first issue is that the stock price has been dropping since 2014 and kept falling. In 2014, the price of stock was at 72.53
There have been years with a slump in the earnings that fall in line with the current economic standing.
Life insurance is meant to provide funds to replace a breadwinner's to protect and support dependents. Chad and Haley are dependents, not income providers. Therefore, the purchase of life insurance is unnecessary and not recommended. The Dumonts should use the money they would spend on policies for the children to increase their own coverage.
Financial Analysis Task 5 Part B-Report to CEO B1. Custom Snowboards sales history has been steadily increasing per the table below. CSI has had small growth in sales with an equal increase in COGS. The COGS is relative to the increase in the net sales, however, CSI should look further into ways they can decrease their COGS line item in order to see more profit growth from year to year. We can see on the Horizontal Analysis below that net sales, COGS and Profit all had the same increases from years 12 to 13 and from years 13 to 14. This is indicative of CSI needing to do more cost based analysis to see where they can make production cost cuts and boost sales. Per the data, operating costs also increased alongside the net sales. Items such
The earnings per share of the common stock is a financial metric for a business' net income believed to be available to reward the common stock shareholders. The ratio is usually calculated by dividing the difference between the net after-tax profits and dividends attributed to preferred shareholders with the average number of outstanding common shares. Significantly higher earnings per share imply that the business is capable of paying reasonable dividends to the common shareholders while a low ratio indicates a reduced ability for the entity to declare and pay reasonable dividends to its common shareholders. From the comparison, Nike has a higher EPS ratio at 1.05 compared to 0.98 for Under Armour. This implies that Nike is performing better than Under Armour and that Nike could be either making increasing earnings or repurchasing its stocks while Under Armour is performing dismally. This low ratio for Under Armour is an
The ratio measures the company’s ability to meet its debt obligations. It allows investors to see to what extent company’s earning can decline without the firm being unable to pay its annual interest costs. Nevertheless, a high ratio can indicate that a company has an undesirable lack of debt or it is paying too much debt with earning that could be invested in other projects.
When looking to diversify into the mining sector BHP stood out for a couple reasons. Firstly the company has a strong P/E ratio with the last released data showing 32.48. This meant BHP was producing strong earnings per share based on their current share price. In conjunction with this BHP had stable debt to equity, showing a stability in their capital structure and therefore we chose to invest in BHP as a value investment as we determined their current share price was undervalued.
While analyzing AT& T a few differences are noted. As with Verizon, the current ratio did improve with an increase of five percent from 58% in 2005 to 63% in 2006. However, even though debt to equity decreased for both companies AT & T's decrease was only 4% compared to Verizon's significant decrease of 23%. The net profit margin ratio did opposite changes between the two companies while Verizon's increase not even one full percent AT &T's decreased by almost 3%. Even with these significant changes AT & T's price to earnings, as of 2006, was at 20.89 (www.hoovers.com). These variances tell us a couple of things. First, that AT& T has taken on more debt in 2006 versus 2005, but along with that debt they have been able to increase their net profit margin, helping the company in the way of earnings. The strong price to earnings ratio of 20.89 also shows that the shareholders are not faring too poorly either.
In addition, given that dividends per share climbed slightly, earnings per share dropped greatly from 1.29 to 0.91, meaning current payout policies limit the value of shareholders.
In January 2006, company-owned bottling operations were brought together to form the Bottling Investments operating group, now the second-largest bottling partner in the Coca-Cola system in terms of unit case volume.
Financial Management is a critical aspect of any business in order to achieve a sustainable and efficient cash flow. It is essential in maintaining the link between a business’s future financial goals (profit maximization) and the resources that it has in order to achieve its objectives. Businesses demand certain common goals that increase a bussiness's all around achievement, Some of which involve; growth amongst assests, An increase in efficiency in all areas of the business whether it be management or not. And the ability to meet short term and long term debts. Finacial management undertakes the responsibility to implement and acheive these goals for the business using a range of strategies shaped to meet the needs of the business and