Force And Ethics In Integrity Training

When evaluating practice with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities, it is necessary that Competency 2: Ethical Practice and Competency 3: Critical Thinking are taken into consideration. Competency 2 requires that social workers are able to recognize and manage personal values in a way that allows professional values to guide practice. Competency 3 requires social workers to demonstrate effective oral and written communication in working with individuals, families, groups, communities, organizations, and colleagues. By following these competency skills, a social worker is able to evaluate their experience with these different populations without being bias, and can display diversity within the profession of social work.

Integrity. To me, integrity is being honest to others and to yourself. It’s to have moral uprights. It’s the state of being whole. It’s a word used to describe someone’s level of honesty. No one is gets integrity once they are born. It is developed by good influences actions. Having integrity is doing the right thing is a trustful way. Someone who has integrity means they have a moral compass that leads them in the right direction. They follow their moral judgements and do good things under all circumstances, even if no one pays attention. They would do nothing that dishonors themselves.

As defined by the Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, Academic Integrity is the moral code or ethical policy of academia. This includes values such as avoidance of cheating or plagiarism; maintenance of academic standards; honesty and rigor in research and academic publishing. Many believe academic integrity to be a strong, pervasive and understood rule when going to Universities and Community Colleges across the globe; however, in the recent decades, abiding to the rules and policies to uphold academic integrity has slowly become more problematic for students across the board. Thesis?

The use of force is without a doubt an important aspect in policing. The decision to utilize any type of force comes from a multitude of recourses; department policies, training, situational variables and ethical systems. There are three major categories in which an officers use of force is categorized under; justifiable, excessive and deadly; with a thin line between justifiable and excessive. Cases where excessive force has been used, has lead to injuries, deaths, civil damages, officers convicted and sentenced to jail and police chiefs and elected officials being removed from office (Fyfe, 1988). It is an officer`s discretion in determining when the use of force is justifiable.

My first interviewee officers jack Davidson, patrolman from Somers point police department. When interviewing Patrolman Davidson, I found the following to be his impressions of the police force in general. Officer Davidson spoke of why ethics and character are important in the field of law enforcement. His response was that ethics and character go hand in hand. In law enforcement it seems that there are so many reasons to do the right thing. The reasons began with public opinion and also should include their influence on the youth who will be growing up to be citizens of the city, state, or country. If a police officer does not behave with

Actions and inactions all have moral implications; they are either right or wrong depending on the individual and what s/he believes or feels is right or wrong. Each person’s conduct can and does have implications and ramifications. For every action there is an equal and/or opposite reaction not only for the average person but also for professionals; especially in the area of law enforcement, criminal justice, and criminal procedure. Just discussed is known as moral philosophy.

What is integrity? This is a very complicated question with a million different ways to answers. Integrity is something that a person can possess. It is something that a structure can possess and it is something that a sport can possess among many other things. When someone is asked if they have integrity the person must think about what qualities are associated with integrity.

We are presented with choices every day. Many are easy to make and cause very little stress, but some choices can be extremely difficult and have significant consequences. The difference between making the right choice or the wrong one is often determined be a persons character, which is based upon the qualities of integrity, responsibility, and honesty. Gaining an understanding of these three character traits and how to build them is critical to creating a lifetime of positive outcomes.

The use of force in the criminal justice fields can be seen as a daily routine because this force by the criminal enforcement officials can save people’s life or they can wrongly interpret by people who witness the use of force. For decades, a very debatable topic people and criminal enforcement agents had fought was the fact that if the use of force by the criminal enforcement officials good for the society or it can be used as a violation of the citizen’s rights. A factor that the people who are against this idea of the criminal enforcement use their force in their duty, is that they don’t realize that as a criminal enforcement officer deal with problems every day dealing with someone’s health from a menace or even the officer’s own health.

To follow the initial importance of all of the aspects of use of force, there are different kinds of use of force (General, 1985). The first of several is constructive authority. Constructive authority doesn’t involve actual physical contact, but simply the use of law enforcement officer’s authority to take control over a suspect (General, 1985).Examples of there are verbal commands, gestures, warnings, and unholstering a weapon (General, 1985). Even pointing a firearm at a subject is an element of constructive authority but is to be used only in appropriate situations (General,

Ethics in criminal justice is an academic training of ethics which is supposed to be applied and practiced in the field of law enforcement. It is a requirement for candidates that are hired as professionals in criminal justice which focusses mainly on matters that are primarily guided by the necessities of social values and social institutions (Banks, 2009). The ethical behavior demonstrates how law enforcing agencies should operate with accordance to established practices of police with ethical guidelines that are consistent with the standards of the community in order to have and maintain public trust when performing assigned responsibilities. Ethics training has been a concern among the field of criminal justice community with a variety

An important objective of the police officers, is to protect and serve the community and the best way to do that is to enforce ethics. According to the FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, there are four different dilemmas, “discretion (legality), duty (service), honesty, and loyalty” (Pollock). When an officer has been taught these different ethics and is able to use each one of them when deciding to pull their gun out and shoot or beat a suspect after they stopped resisting, this incorporates a better relationship between the officers and the community. In the police academy, the recruits are taught these different dilemmas as a foundation so that when they are put into a particular situation they can make the best decision on how to handle the

After amassing and reviewing all information collected through the assessment of moral integrity and the ethical decision framework, the nurse should have a better understanding of the ethical dilemma and how it affect each person and the organization. It will better allow her to show moral courage to overcome fears, and resist pressure and act differently to make “right” decision. Making the “right” decision however requires the nurse to demonstrate moral leadership and courage. The nurse may have to overcome adversities that might test her resolve in ways unimaginable. Commitment will be a key element to obtain changes, if they happen at all. At the end, if the changes lead to creating an ethically conductive environment and workplace, the nurse would have advocated for patients, herself and colleagues.

Dees highlights several crucial concepts regarding resilient leadership in Chapters 3 and 4. The quality of leadership largely determines the overall upward or downward direction of a company. A resilient leader has the ability to influence people to willingly put forth effort to achieve a goal, which is at the core of being a leader. The most effective leaders recognize how to influence subordinates while moving forward with an effective plan that will benefit all involved. The three most important concepts from Chapter 3 and 4 are integrity, courage, and wisdom.

Integrity is how somebody lives their life. In this life we live, we face choices every day that only we can answer. We dictate how we run our own lives, and they way we run them defines us. Integrity is doing the right thing versus the wrong thing. People, if nothing else, can always have their pride, their integrity. It is something that means a lot to some people and then nothing to others. The ones who value their integrity highly are the good people in this world, and the opposite is true for those who do not value their integrity.