preview

Foucault Essay

Decent Essays

Of course, the analysis of Michel Foucault didn’t stay unnoticeable. In fact his work stirred up all sorts of discussions. The author was accused of misreading the artwork, reducing the role of Velasquez as a creator of Las Meninas and as a historical figure, imposing artificial meaning that is not there, oversimplifying the painting and so on. In short, Foucault’s interpretation located outside of traditional art historical approach and therefore didn’t seem legit for many scholars.
One of the main critiques comes from Robert Wicks, who blames Foucault’s so called “oeuvre-independent approach” for starting the new trend in philosophical discussions, characterized by one-sidedness of viewpoint (Wicks, 259). Followers of Foucault often read the work of art from their own perspective, completely disregarding its historical …show more content…

Only in comparison with other Velazquez’s paintings, “the crucial layer’s of work meaning” can be revealed (260). In contrast to Foucault, Wicks uses traditional historian method to scrutinize the painting. First, Wicks compares Las Meninas and The Spinners. Both works have depicted fable of Arachne on the background (one of wall paintings in Las Meninas depicts myth of Arachne), and if Velazquez chose this particular subject in his two major works, it must be very important for him, therefore one must consider it in her/his interpretation(268). Second Wicks’ comparison would be of Las Meninas and St. John the Evangelist on the Island of Patmos (1618). By juxtaposing hand position in both painting, together with one of the many possible audiences of Las Meninas, namely the menina figure, Wicks concludes that Velazquez personifies himself as St. John, “portraying

Get Access