Framers Of The Constitution

The Judicial Review it helps to make sure that all new laws passed do not voglite the constitution. Or are rights as citizens. This power however is weekend by a slow to act congress. It is also strengthened by the changing opinions of the court judges. The job of the federal government is to lead but also protect the rights and freedoms of its citizens. Judicial review accomplishes this by insuring that laws are checked with the constitution.

The judicial branch, or the judiciary, is basically the court system for the United States. Their main purpose is to make sure all laws passed are in accordance with the Constitution, and to resolve any disagreements. The decisions in the courtroom are either ruled constitutional or unconstitutional. They also have judicial review which is the ability to declare laws unconstitutional. The head of the judiciary is the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is made up of nine judges, one of which is called the chief justice. The judges are appointed by the President and supported by the Senate if they are in agreement. These judges do not

The Judicial Branch has opened up opportunities for the country of the United States of America in many ways. The Judicial Branch has found new ways to affect our society. They are meant to interpret the laws for our country. They do this to ensure our country is being protected by the

Both the right to petition and assemble manifested themselves well before the Bill of Rights existed; they date all the way back to the Magna Carta, which was formulated in 1215. The Framers of the Constitution, using this historical document as well as a myriad of others as a basis, added a Bill of Rights to the end of the Constitution in 1789. Today, people exercise the many rights included in the Bill of Rights to express their opinion on an issue, but the extent to which these rights are practiced is quite controversial. Although some people believe that the right to petition and assemble should be unlimited, leaving these without restriction could be dangerous for the American people as it blurs the line between peace and violence, could

The Founding Fathers put their blood, sweat and tears into the making of the Constitution and created a government out of practically nothing, all while having a vision for the future. This future consisted of a government that focused on liberty over security; a government of minimal intervention. To say that the modern version of the United States government is exactly what the Founding Fathers envisioned is a very debatable topic. There are many instances where todays government has followed the Constitution for the most part, but then there are a lot of other areas where the Founders visions have been twisted to the point that they are unrecognizable anymore. To start off, the basic concept of the United States government is one of checks and balances. This was put in place to ensure that the government never became too powerful. One very good example of checks and balances is the media. Even the founding fathers knew the extreme power of the media and its ability to keep the government in check. Two men by the names of William Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer were even able to create the Spanish American War by the process of yellow journalism, or the crude exaggeration of events. The first amendment states that “Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.” The government today reflects this belief that the media is a watchdog or “fourth estate” as it is so often referred to. Political parties and everything that comes with it, including

The Framers of the United States Constitution gave more power to the Federal government rather than the state governments. They did this because they wanted to bring the United States together under one government. Federalists and Anti-federalists had their own views on the Constitution. Many people believed that the Constitution was a good thing that would be a success for the United States. Other people believed that the Constitution gave too much power to the Executive branch. The writers of the Constitution gave more power to the Federal government instead of the state governments because the Federal government did not receive enough power in the Articles of Confederation.

The framers of the 1787 Constitution formed a just government with ideals such as separation of power that insured none of the three branches of government could hold more power than the others, representation of people to ensure a democratic society in which everyone had a voice, and allowed changes to be made in order to fit with the evolution of people's views. This constitution at the time established a just government, by definition, but at the same time represented how unjust our society was, by allowing slavery to stay prominent, and removing a majority of the people's power from the three branches of government, however these issues were understandable due to trying to represent everyone at that time.

The Framers of the Constitution ultimately give more powers to the federal government Federalist and Antifederalist outcomes. The Constitution is the document that changed all powers from state to the federal powers putting Federalist in the best spot for that time. The Article of Confederation lacked in many areas in the reasons of why the Constitution was written and whom it was written by. Who are more likely to be Federalist and who are more likely to be Anti Federalist. So we are going to find out why the Anti Federalist let down their guard and lt the nation become one with a federal government.

Federalism is a system of government in which entities such as states or provinces share power with a national government. During the creation of the constitution the Framers questioned where powers should lie in these separate entities; The Framers however didn’t want to make the mistake of centralized power so they used the system that utilized checks and balances. They created a that system Charles de Montesquieu called the idea of dividing government power into three branches the "separation of powers." He believed it was most important to create separate branches of government with equal but different powers. In the framework, it became clear that they framers wanted preserve liberty with usage of dividing power among state and government.

There is a disease running rampant on the streets of Washington DC. It is a disease that cripples the economy, destroys jobs and leaves Americans living on the streets. Inordinate spending perpetuates the sickness and corrupt politicians keep the cure at bay. Federal expansion is ruining the lives of American citizens and creating a society of impecunious and pusillanimous citizens, unable and unwilling to speak out against the higher power which controls every aspect of their lives. “Where are our (sic) Men of abilities? Why do they not come forth to save their Country?” George Washington once inquired to his fellow man, now, many Americans may find themselves asking this same question as the country continues its spiral downwards

In order to understand the motivation of the Framers of the U.S. Constitution one must review the event leading up to it. When the war with Great Britain finally came to a close, the Colonialist of America became weary of what was to come. Many who were well versed in Tomas Hobbes and John Locke feared, without proper action and if not too long delayed, the that states would find themselves in a State of Nature.

The Constitutional framers would never have believed how much power the President of the United States has obtained to this present day. Based off their work, it seems as if the framers expected Congress to have the vast majority of power. It is true that Congress still has maintained some of their power; yet, as a collective society we tend to place our sole interest on the president and magnify on all his accomplishments and especially on all his losses (sometimes even blaming him for events that are out of his jurisdiction). Nonetheless, the president has gained quite a remarkable amount of power over the years and it is highly noticeable when analyzing differences in the institutions, the policies, and culturally.

Colonial Americans balanced the desire for individual liberty with the needs of collective society. The Framers structured the Constitution to protect the nation while upholding the rights of the individual. The Constitution’s preamble states what the government’s fundamental purpose is “promote the general welfare”. The first three words of the Constitution’s preamble, “We the people”, set the tone for establishing a government that would derive its power from the people. Forming a democratic state was essential for achieving a balance between the nation and it’s people. Democracy focuses on the rights of the people, instead of the government right to control people. Article I of the Constitution forms Congress, the legislative branch of government, as a bicameral body. The creation of a bicameral body upholds a system for

The Framers of the Constitution in 1787 believed the people weren’t intelligent enough to choose their own leader. They were concerned how informed their voters would be and decided that the president should be elected indirectly. Thus, the Electoral College was produced. The Electoral College, fundamentally, prohibits civilians from voting directly for the president. How does this work? First, the country holds the popular vote. Every adequate voter in every state gets one vote for the president. Then, it is passed to the electoral vote. Now, each state obtains at least three votes depending on the population of that state. In order to be declared president, the candidate must receive a majority of the votes. If no one acquires a majority of the votes, then the House of Representatives elects the president from the top three contenders. In which case, each state gets one vote. Therefore, is it time to get rid of the Electoral College? The answer is no; the process may not be equal, but it protects the country’s ideologies. The Electoral College should be kept because it keeps extremists in check, protects the federalist system, and settles the presidency.

In the earliest years, people such as Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson had disagreements on how power should be held. The framers wanted to be sure that the states obeyed the federal government. During the last weeks of John Adams’ term he appointed a number of people to office. He appointed 3 people to the United States Supreme Court Justices, 16 people to the Circuit courts and 4 people to the District court's. So in end the judicial review is essential for the constitutional government because they can check if the laws are used correctly in the eyes of the constitution.