preview

Francois Rabelais And Thomas More Dystopia

Decent Essays

The word “utopia” descended from a Greek word meaning “no place” and today is defined by the Oxford English Dictionary as “an imagined or hypothetical place, system, or state of existence in which everything is perfect, especially in respect of social structure, laws and politics” (). Both Francois Rabelais and Thomas More describes the Utopic world to depict the ideal human society, however, both texts describe a society in which dystopian features are extremely emphasized. This shows that there is a thin line between an orderly society and a repressive dystopian one. Historically, Utopia has been considered by its values of egalitarianism: it has no class divisions; people have economic freedom and stability, and have free will and lastly, …show more content…

In Thomas More’s Utopia, there are clear gender divisions in the way people behave and males play the dominant role when it comes to society. “…wives are subject to their husbands…” (). This quote from the lines that depict the manner of living is an explicit evidence that shows that men are women are not equal. Women are subject to their men; so, More depicts men to be the deciders when it comes to creating a family of their own. Moreover, although both women and men learns a second trade, “as the weaker sex,” () women are trained lighter crafts, while the heavier works are assigned to men. Once again, Thomas More is explicitly saying that the women and men are not equal in terms of power; men are stronger than women. Furthermore, there is a distinction in the way people cloth that signifies who is men or women, and who is married and unmarried. Therefore, all of these show that men and women do not hold an equal share in Thomas More’s Utopia, which demonstrates that utopia was overshadowed by the dystopian …show more content…

Thomas More offers a highly ordered society. “….one occupation at which everyone works, … trained in it from childhood…” (). People are working in agriculture, which they practice from childhood. This means that no one is really offered the opportunity of individual expression and practice what they want. And furthermore, if these people want to learn another trade, he or she requires a permission. Commonsense “permission” clearly means that these people have no free will. Moreover, despite the “abundance of everything” everyone is wearing the same thing. And if a person want to visit a friend or wants to travel just to discover a new place, he or she requires a permission. Thus, although the opportunities to have everything and travel around, no one use can benefit from those opportunities. This simply shows that people are without free will and obliged to a highly ordered system. In Abbey of Theleme, on the other hand, it seems initially that people have their free will and can govern their lives as they wish to. Rabelais says “…their lives were not ordered and governed by laws and statutes and rules, but according to their own free will…” (). He demonstrates that women and men of Theleme governed their lives, got up when they wish and worked when feel like. In other words, there were no obligations. Commonsense no obligations mean free will.

Get Access