preview

Free Speech and National Security Essay example

Good Essays
There was an article saying that in 2007, the government subpoenaed amazon.com to obtain book purchasing records of amazons customers. Judge Stephen Crocker said that, “ the subpoena is troubling because it permits the government to peek into the reading habits of specific individuals with out their knowledge or permission. It is an unsettling and un-American scenario to envision federal agents nosing through the reading lists of law-abiding citizens while hunting for evidence against somebody else.” This article brings into question the constitutional rights of the 4th and 9th amendments, of warrants and privacy of citizens: should the government be able to look into private records showing purchases and other private businesses of…show more content…
Associated press. "Anti-Muslim images are protected speech, Minn. officials say." Web. A recent article states that superbowl-style ads could soon be coming to your TV. This means that independent corporations could advertise for a political candidate on TV. Now, the question here is should corporations be able to advertise for political candidates? Associated press. "Super bowl-style corporate ads for candidates?" Web. An article says that the supreme court has dismissed a case of a soldier at fort riley when he says he was rights were violated when prayers were made at fort riley regardless of soldiers religions, or the fact he was atheist. The question is that should forts be able to hold religious prayers regardless of soldier’s religions? Associated press. "Court dismisses atheists suit against pentagon." Web. Outline1- hook - Imagine that someone puts up posters that a very offensive and critical of your religion, next to a place of worship for your religion. Well a man in Minneapolis put up some anti-Muslim posters near a mosque and a Somali-owned store. The store owner was planning on pressing charges but the prosecutors dropped the charges because they were struck down saying that the posters were protected by the first amendment. Which I totally agree with in saying that someone should be able to put up religious images, even if it does offend someone. Argument1- Anyone should be
Get Access