Free Will Research Paper

“Mama was my greatest teacher, a teacher of compassion, love and fearlessness. If love is sweet as a flower, then my mother is that sweet flower of love”. Family is supposed to be the one thing in life that offers you love and, comfort. Above all parent’s first instincts are to love their kids and do anything to protect them, but sadly that was not the case for Robert Harris. Harris was sentenced to Death Row because he murdered two teenage boys after he stole their car with the intention of committing a robbery. To make an attempt to understand what could have led Harris to commit these crimes and therefore to the death sentencing, I will give you a brief summary of his past.

Free will represents an impact between two opposite perspectives. From a metaphysics perspective we wonder If we don't have free will then why are we here? What is the point of life if we cannot choose our course of actions. But from a scientific perspective we have questions like is it possible that anything can happen without having it be caused by something else? Some things really can't be described within the science that we all rely on. It makes people have free choices that forms who they are, and are responsible for their consequences. "Majority of philosophers suppose that the concept of free will is very closely connected to the concept of moral responsibility"(Connor 2002). I believe that free will is similar to moral responsibility

In his paper, “In Defence of Free Will,” Philosopher C. A. Campbell introduces a Libertarian conception of free will. Campbell’s view of free will consists of the ideas that a free choice is caused by the self, but not by a specific occurrence happening within the self. He describes an action as free if and only if the self is the sole cause of the action, and the agent had the choice to act differently. He admits that the first condition alone is not sufficient criterion to deem an action as free. He states “it is possible to conceive an act of which the agent is the sole cause, but which is at the same time an act necessitated by the agent's nature,” (Campbell 284) and is in part, not an action of free will. The belief which insists, and

My second notion of free will requires that an actor is able to decide between different possibilities of actions that lead towards different futures. Robert Kane calls this concept ‘a garden of forking paths’; every action leads to other actions that again allow for alternatives of action (Kane, 2005: 7). If an actor could not have done otherwise, he would not have had free choice. Even if he did not choose to do otherwise, he could not have done so. Free will seems to require the power to do otherwise, or our actions would

The concept restrains our freedom over selecting the alternatives when making decisions, which contradicts the definition of free will, since free will means that we have the freedom to act otherwise in the same situation without constraints or restrictions, making them incompatible. Some argue that if we do not have the freedom to choose to do otherwise, then we

In order for one to reach happiness, one has to make many choices; these choices exhibit free will because one is choosing their path based off of their own ability to choose. Making a choice is free will on its own. Since there is more than one choice, then there is free will to choose.

What does it mean to have free will? To have free will means that you have control of a certain power and that no one would judge you by the decisions and actions you make. This is because there is literally no wrong answer, you do what is right and just. All that matters is that individuals are responsible for the choices they make to benefit their own well being.

Oxford English dictionary defines free will as “the power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate; the ability to act at one's own discretion”. Free will, do we have it yes or no. I think that in a small sense, yes everyone does I think that you can choose to eat a salad instead of a piece cake or to turn in your paper on time and things like that. Since I believe there is “small free will” I should explain what I consider to be “big free will”. I believe that there is one thing in our lives that people have to choose which is Jesus or not Jesus. I think that’s our big free will, but I don’t believe we have it. I believe in election that means God chooses you. I believe this mainly because it’s spread out through the bible, not

Free will is “the ability to act without being determined by anteceding factors (Strawson 584).” The idea that we are not fully in control of what we are doing and what is going on around us intimidates many people because

William Rowe defines gratuitous evil as an instance of intense suffering which an omnipotent, omniscient being could have prevented without thereby losing some greater good or permitting some evil equally bad or worse.(Rowe 335) In a world with so much evil it raises the questions If God is all powerful, all knowing and all good, how can he allow bad things to happen to good people? Can God even exist in a world with so such gratuitous evil? These are questions that has afflicted humanity for a very long time and has been the question to engross theologians for centuries. The existence of evil has been the most influential and powerful reason to disprove the existence of God. It is believed among many theist that God is the creator and caretaker

The unique ability that each and every individual possesses that enable him/her to control their actions is known as free will. Free will is directly connected to two other vital philosophical issues: freedom of action and moral accountability, which is the main reason why the debate is so vital. Simply stated, a person who has free will refers to an individual’s ability to choose his or her route of action. However, animals also appear to suit this measure, further adding to the debate because free will is typically thought to only be possessed by human beings (Broad 1990).

Free Will is like a Dog Leash. When a dog is on a leash, it has some control of where it wants to go. It can choose to walk slowly, run, sit or go. In the end, the person holding the leash has ultimate control. The dog can do what it wants while on the leash, but the person holding the leash always has control. Some leashes are extendable, so as the dog runs the leash gets longer. The dog can then run as far as it can until it runs out of leash. The person holding the leash has the power to make the leash longer and slower, or pull the dog to one side or another. The person also has the power to make the dog stop or go. For the most part, the dog decides what it wants but in the end, the person holding that leash decides what happens.

Today we accept that freedom is a basic right human right but what exactly is freedom. 1On one hand, there is physical freedom. People who are not imprisoned or enslaved are free. On the other hand, there is freedom as a the right to act, speak or think what you want. People cannot reach their full potential if they are not free in both senses of the word.

There are many great philosophical ideas and questions that are known and of course unknown. One of the questions that really enticed my interest was the question of whether or not we have free will. I myself was once a believer of people having free will and doing what I want was my choice and my choice alone. However, after careful consideration and lectures I have been reversed in how I believe in free will. Is there any free will though? Many people would say yes there is and of course there are some who believe that free will is a fallacy and not to be believed. Whether or not there is free will is yet to be determined but what we have to go on and by is from philosophers and every person who has their two cents to fill in. In

Although there are numerous definitions as to what freedom mean based upon individual perspectives. Freedom can be defined as _________________ People might be limited by some constraint so freewill may not be completely "free" but the thoughts about possibilities are unlimited and the way in which people get involved in such possibilities is not an aspect that can limit freewill. In Sartre essay titled Existentialism and Human emotion, he points out that from the moment we are brought into this world, we take on the role of responsibility for all of our actions. It makes me think about what the term “free” truly refers when people use it. There aren’t any external benefits that humans can base the way we live. Regardless of whether someone gives you a choice or not, you still have the ability to choose. That is the one and only innate ability any one person possesses. Sartre says, we must be accountable for our actions because it’s ours and no one else’s. I doubt that God would want us to choose to take responsibility over one action over another because we think it’s in our nature to do so. If life was all about handing over our responsibilities to God or to another, wouldn’t you think we would be a less motivated society, without intentions to