preview

Gilded Age Research Paper

Decent Essays

Argumentative Essay
The ability to have ownership over something, tangible or not, can give a person a sense of value or superiority when comparing themselves to others. Furthermore, as humans, it is easy to desire things as one’s own and claim it, but the way something is treated differs from person to person. As a result, the material items and skills a person has ownership over provides a glimpse of his or her’s true nature.
According to Plato, the ownership of objects can hold a detrimental stake to the character of a person. When applied to a more specific case, such as slavery in America where the concept of owning people as property was a recurring norm in various societies, a vivid description about the white southern males who owned …show more content…

During the Gilded Age, Andrew Carnegie, a wealthy business tycoon, monopolized the steel industry, manifested a steel company that drove America’s industry further into success, and eventually he became a billionaire in the late 19th century. With such a high abundance of wealth, it would be easy to spend it on one’s selfish desires, however, Carnegie showcased his true colors by expressing his adoration for the arts by partaking in charitable acts of donating money to local libraries, education, and scientific research. Through his opportunity to have ownership of billions of dollars, Carnegie built a leadership role as one of the only dedicated philanthropists during the time of the Gilded Age where many men, including Cornelius Vanderbilt, John D. Rockefeller, and J.P. Morgan, had an abundance of wealth, but lacked any participation of philanthropist acts. As a result, Carnegie further showcased how owning so much money can exhibit one not succumbed to greed through his book, “The Gospel of Wealth,” where he describes how those who own large expanses of wealth have the responsibility of giving back to the community in ways such as philanthropy. Through the ownership of an over surplus of money and the understanding of the importance of charitable acts, Andrew Carnegie was able to develop …show more content…

Unlike tangible goods, education and skills, for the most part, should come free and there are no limits or an extent placed on such concepts. Everyday, people are given an opportunity to learn, in school or from their surroundings, and gain experiences that they will own forever. According to Albert Einstein, there is no limit to how much one can learn and that intellectual growth will only cease at death. This determination to strive to improve and extend on one’s intellect and skills develops from the ownership of such intangible characteristics that make up a person. Einstein makes a point to never give up ownership of one’s own ability to freely learn and express curiosites, and while it seems impossible to have intangible objects taken, history reveals times where it has occurred. The most prominent occurrence would be that of Rosa Parks who, aware of her civil rights, stood her ground and refused to subjugate to the racist acts that attempted to strip her of her identity, humanity, and freedom. Through her inspiring actions, Parks revealed how a woman can have the power to be courageous and that African Americans will no longer be enslaved to corrupt ideals attempting to rob them of

Get Access