Give Me that Old Time Atheist Religion
Recently, I've noticed that some of my friends have become concerned about me because I'm an atheist. This is odd, because I've never made any secret of that fact, although I don't go around preaching it to anyone who will listen. Ever since I realized that I no longer agreed with any of the religious viewpoints which I was brought up with, I have explained my opinions, as clearly as I can, to those who were interested, curious, or who challenged by beliefs.
Two months ago, I went and visited a friend of mine who lives in another town. She introduced me to some of her best friends, and we began to discuss our viewpoints on different issues. We discussed abortion, politics, and the death
…show more content…
Of course not. Does a person need a belief in a god to have meaning in their life? Certainly not. Does a person need a belief in something forever beyond our ability to grasp in order to feel the emotions of joy, worship, or love? Definitely not. And does a person need to believe in any gods in order to have a religion? No!
I have an ethical system. I believe that the highest goal I can pursue in my own life is the attainment of joy for myself. I believe that joy comes from the products of one's mind--whether those products be material (such as a painting a person has done, or a new car that a person has bought from their wages at work) or non-material (a sense of accomplishment, the knowledge that a person has created and brought something completely new into the world, a friendship based on mutual respect, or a romantic relationship between two people who love each other for who and what they are). I believe that since the products of a person's mind are the way to personal joy, the one inalienable right every person has is the right to pursue the fruits of the mind as far as they are able to. Not everyone is going to be able to create as much with their mind as everyone else. Tough. If everyone had a mental capacity that were equal to everyone else's, what meaning could we possibly attach to the product's of one's mind? When
What is atheism? Why would someone be an atheist? Why do people fear and dislike atheism? Simply stated, atheism is the lack of belief in a god or gods. Granted, atheists are each individuals and undoubtedly each of them prescribe [to] many different philosophies on life, politics and morality as do Christians. However, though atheists may choose to gather collectively for whatever purpose, unlike Christianity, atheism is not a belief system. An individual who identifies himself as an atheist is merely stating that he does not believe in [the existence of] god or gods. Atheism, as indicated by its name, is the opposite of theism which is belief in at least one god; to include polytheism (belief in many or more than one god) and monotheism
Society in all cultures share a common trait: Religion. Studying religion in any society reveals many of their traits and explains the actions of the individual. For example, Jewish people live their lives according to what was written in the Talmud and the Torah. They respect the Sabbath and also eat Kosher meat. Even when looking at Huxley's A Brave New World, analyzing religion still helps us understand the actions of the societies and characters within the book.
Studies such as the arts and theology were discriminated against in 1960, and a lack of creativity leads to a lack of innovation and thoughts of change. During the Stalin era, the cult of personality was very important for him to keep the socialist system alive and under fear. In 1960 to maintain this fear loyalty towards the system, certain ideologies were discouraged. Atheism was very prevalent, and theological schools were non-existent within the union. The arts were briefly touched but were merely a hobby one can entertain oneself with. (Soviet education under) Science and social welfare were the main focuses of the state, and of that would change for an extended amount of time. Many of these thoughts and ideas, however, were very different
American physicist and Nobel Prize recipient Steve Weinberg once claimed that “ for good people to do evil things, it takes religion”. However, the culprit isn’t the mere term and message behind religion, but the institutions that tug the puppet strings of it’s meaning and impact. Secular “religious” institutions have proven time and time again that an idea as controversial as religion can be used for a wide spectrum of uses, and unfortunately, Fordism in Brave New World falls under the corrupt end of the spectrum. In this novel, the author Aldous Huxley uses Fordism and its purpose to mirror the modern day secular institution trend in religious communities to illustrate how lack of religion and spirituality can give way to a sovereignty of
Pakistan, May 2007 around 8:00 pm, I existed the local madrasa (religious school), completing the 5th daily prayer and recitation of the Quran, and proceeded to head home wearing my light blue Kameez, White Salwar, and a Kufi on my head to offer a sign of humility before God. The reason I remember that warm windy night is because that day the mullah taught me that we humans are sent to earth by almighty god so he can test our loyalty to him. Those who follow his true path will ascend to the heavens upon death, and those who disobey him and his prophets will suffer in hell for eternity. I was 8 back then and life was good. Despite the Taliban decapitating captured soldiers and letting them rot in the intersections to
In the article “ On Being an Atheist,” H.J. McCloskey attempts to inform his readers that the belief in atheism is a “much more comfortable belief” by effectively using a disdainful rhetoric towards theists and their faith. McCloskey delves into both the Cosmological and Teleological arguments, which within he criticizes the arguments and to further his argument against theism, he also presents the Problem of Evil and why evil cannot possibly exist with a perfect God being the creator of universe. What will be displayed in this essay are the counter-arguments to McCloskey’s criticisms and the attempt to discredit his claims that regard the “comfortable” position that lies within atheism and its arguments.
The rules and regulations of Neivanism are carved onto a glacier on the outside of the first settlement. If the ice begins to melt, the rules are just re carved.The Neivanists follow a certain set of rues based on good human nature. The main three rules of their religion are, 1) Not to kill another human being 2) Hladgunnr is the only true god 3) Never take more then you need, and if you have more then enough you give it to someone less fortunate. If a person follows these three rules they will be considered a good person.
Being an atheist can be difficult. It was my choice to become an atheist but I don’t have any desire to sway others to become atheists, it’s their choice. One of the things that are difficult for me is when the topic of religion is discussed. I understand people are entitled to their own opinions and I don’t think someone who believes in a god is wrong. However, I dislike when stereotype atheist as sinful and wicked people. It’s difficult to defend to others without seeming rude or hostile. Another thing that is difficult for me is when people try to preach their religion to me. I understand some religions teach that their religion is the only truth, and they want everyone around them to embrace it. However, it’s difficult to tell a person you don’t believe in their god without them getting offended and receiving negative comments.
The definition of happiness has long been disputed, and in order to establish a general definition one must discover mankind’s function (1095a.20). The distinct function of human beings will differentiate man from all other beings, thus it cannot be related to the characteristics of animals or plants. Aristotle explains that all living beings grow, and that man and animals share instinct. Through elimination, Aristotle establishes the distinct function of man as logic. Only human beings contain three souls and have the ability to use reason. Aristotle states, “the function of man then is activity of soul [thinking well and doing well] in accordance with reason” (). Ultimately, logic allows human beings to use reason in decision-making and to be virtuous.
I’m agnostic; and if I walk into any room and say, “I don’t really believe in God,” the silence could be split with a knife. After that, I would be judged all night, maybe get some dirty looks as well. Atheists and agnostics are believed by Christians to be such bad people, almost as though we’re out to get the world. Just because we don’t have the same morals and beliefs, doesn’t mean that we’re bad people; it just means that we’re different in that aspect. When I told a friend of mine that I didn’t really believe in God, she said “That’s sad.” And it was sad. Sad that she thinks I’m a different person because of that. Just because I don’t follow what everyone else thinks, she thinks that I’m doomed. Having this belief doesn’t make me less of a person, it doesn’t make me less fun or intelligent or kind. It actually stung me to hear that coming from her. I’m used to hearing that from other people, and I always shrug it off. Other people’s judgments never affect me. But I admit that I had higher standards for her. I thought she was one of the Christians who would accept
Warm Greetings in our Lord's name. How are you? Its been a while I sent you a mail. I pray and hope you all are doing well and taking care of yourself.
In the article, “On Being an Atheist”, H.J. McCloskey discusses the reasons of why he believes being an atheist is a more acceptable than Christianity. McCloskey believes that atheism is a more rational belief versus having a God who allows people to suffer so he can have the glory. He believes to live in this world, you must be comfortable. The introduction of his article, he implements an overview of arguments given by the theist, which he introduces as proofs. He claims that the proofs do not create a rationalization to believe that God exists. He provides 3 theist proofs, which are Cosmological argument, teleological argument, and the argument of design. He also mentions the presence of evil in the world. He focuses on the existence
Atheistic people believe in nothing like a god or a higher being. “The Atheistic people do not believe in a spiritual being at all. They believe that there is nothing out there on the other side but death” (Beyer). Many like the fact of not believing, they think that they can just live life normal without a religion to hold them back on what they are \about to do. Also these people do not worry about death or what they are going to do in life with a religion, they just do not
Religious followers should broaden their viewpoints and be more open to new ways and ideas. The American Atheist Association should teach people of Atheism so there wouldn't be the problem of acceptance. News broadcasts should be aired to bring awareness to the slaughters that happened to Atheists in Turkey and Bangladesh. Understanding Atheism will help with the discrimination and abuse contrary to the
People in our society today who have the atheist point of view on religion, which is the belief that there is no god, are going against the so-called norms of society, and therefor are seen as deviant. Deviance is just an idea. Society determines what is deviant by the ideas they hold of what should be the norm. Atheism is seen as a negative deviance, or below the norm. They have a status that is placed on them in society. It doesn’t necessarily mean that they believe in evil, although that is how it is sometimes viewed from people in society who have a specific religion or faith. Atheism, which is not a new idea, has been evolving in our society, and is the reason for problems leading to debate and court cases, and for