preview

Good Vs Evil In Lord Of The Flies

Good Essays

Good vs. Evil has always been a common concept in books. However, In Lord of the Flies, William Golding also plays with the idea of apathetic vs evil. Characters such as Roger and Jack express the darker sides of life on a larger scale. Yet, even though both boys are antagonists capable of horrifically violent acts, they are quintessentially different in the methods they employ to obtain their goals. Can two characters, whom, at first glance seem so alike really be so different? If so, can it be said that one may be worse than the other? Lord of the Flies primary antagonist is Jack, who defines the term of psychopath, whereas Golding portrays Rodger as having an underlying evil, that gives meaning to the idea of a sociopath. When the the …show more content…

This first moment of meeting Roger shows the reader that this character will not be the savior, but rather one of the causes of destruction. Not only does Golding express in Rogers appearance that he is one of the villains, but after being on the Island without authority for a short period of time, it comes to light that he has a darker side when he tries to hurt one of the boys: "Roger stooped, picked up a stone, aimed...and threw it at Henry, (Golding 62)." When Roger is throwing the rocks at Henry, he does it so that he is hidden from the young boy. This way Henry is not fully aware of what is happening and finds it to be a game. Since Roger did not reveal to Henry that he was the one throwing the rocks, this shows that to Roger hurting is not a way to earn a strange sense of respect, but shows that he is giving in to what is inside of himself. After this moment when Roger realizes his inner …show more content…

Jack is described as having a "crumpled and freckled...face" that was "ugly without silliness"(Golding 20). The reader can see that this character is a boy with hardly any sense of joy. He arrives on the island leading a group of choir boys, and he feels that since he was the leader for them he should be the leader for the rest of the stranded boys as well. Although Jack wishes to be the leader of the boys, he finds that one of the only ways to win their approval is by proving himself worthy. He decides to go out to try to kill a pig, but when the chance presents itself, he finds he is not able to. For when he raised his arm in the air, he "[paused] only long enough...to understand what an enormity the downward stroke would be"(Golding 31). Ever since the moment that Jack was unable to kill his first pig the reader sees how even though he wanted to with most of himself he did not have a distinct killer instinct. Yet as the book continues it becomes prominent that Jack wishes to kill the pig as a way of proving that "there would be no mercy"(Golding 31). Unlike Roger, Jack feels alienated by the act of killing anything as himself, so he decides to paint his face so he may "hide, liberated from shame and self-consciousness" in a freeing kind of way "the mask compelled them"(Golding 64). From the moment that Jack put the mask on he was no longer a boy but now a

Get Access