There’s a lot of controversy today on whether Graffiti is a good thing or not. Graffiti has been seen by many as a destruction of property, but it is a form of expression and an artistic thought that should be allowed, per the First Amendment, as freedom of speech and not as breaking the law. I personally believe that Graffiti should be legal. I don’t believe it harms anyone or anything depending on the location. I believe Graffiti has many issues that every individual looks at differently. I think that Graffiti is looked at as Vandalism because of the location that the artists decide to put them in, and even the image of the actual painting itself. There a many different forms of Graffiti, like Street Art and Subway Art. But most Graffiti problems become a problem because no one listens to the people’s opinions on location and how they feel about it being vandalism. There are many different views on Graffiti being an art or not and I am going to talk about those things today. I strongly believe that people think Graffiti is a crime because of the imagery and placement of the art. I have read about people getting Graffiti mixed with tags. Graffiti is usually an …show more content…
I believe that Graffiti is a way for an individual to express their feelings without anyone having to know exactly what they’re talking about or who did the artwork. I firmly think that Graffiti is such a better way to get through something, rather than consuming drugs or trying to run away from their problems. If there was a certain place set aside in the community for Graffiti artists to do their work, I think a lot of people would benefit from a giant brick wall filled with other people’s art. Graffiti is also an amazing anxiety reliever for people with high anxiety, they may even be able to be less anxious because they have something to look forward to, and they can do it without being afraid of getting in trouble for trying to feel
Even though graffiti takes talent, it is disrespectful to put on buildings and on trains. The most important building that should not have graffiti one it should be schools. School is a building that kids go to daily and they do not want to come to schools that has paint all over the outside walls of the building.
Graffiti has been around for more than half a decade and practiced worldwide. However there is debate between whether it is a form of art or vandalism. Graffiti artists’ debate that many do not understand the reason most graffiti artist take the risk of incarceration, fines, injuries, and in some cases death to paint a wall. A graffiti artist can have the simple desire to become recognized, or to create a piece that speaks to their audience as a form of self expression. Because graffiti is associated with gangs and acts of destruction to some many cannot see the history and importance graffiti can have on a worldwide scale. Due to the fact that graffiti is usually produced illegally, meaning it is
If you were to go open a dictionary and look up the definition of art, you would see that it has art as “The expression or application of human creative skill and imagination…” (“Art” 2017) and “Works produced by human creative skill and imagination.” (“Art” 2017). From these definitions, graffiti is art, yet in most cases, it’s considered vandalism because it is done without permission of the property. When graffiti is done in a designated place or with the permission of the property owner, then it can truly be considered art. But even if these circumstances are not met, if the graffiti goes beyond a simple tag, it is art.
By definition, graffiti is illegal. It is also considered vandalism because public or private property is intentionally destroyed, but in Alex Boyd’s blog “In Defense of Graffiti”, he clearly conveys his argument about how graffiti shows qualities of value and shouldn’t be criticized on impulse. Even though many people have seen graffiti as something to be condoned, punishable, and terrorizing, it is actually just another form of expression, communication, art, and point of view.
Generally most people look and take graffiti as a form of destruction and wanting to cause violence, but in the artist’s mind they want to be creative and help the people around them by making art to cheer someone up or create a sense of creativity in others. They don’t do it to go to jail or because they want to pay a fine they do it because they are open minded and creative. For instance, “A lot of attention is given to the ‘broken window’ theory, which says that signs of disorder like petty vandalism, fare jumping … and yes, graffiti, open the window to larger crimes,” Verel told The Huffington Post. “But little is paid to the ways graffiti is harnessed for good in a form that’s both constructive and authentic”(Patrick Verel). They are taking this broken windows theory too far and only saying it can cause bigger crimes. Some graffiti artists are trying to uplift the neighborhoods and the people they live around with creative art. Also not all graffiti is bad enough to want artists to commit a crime. While making this art or graffiti I don’t think that these artist are trying to harm the buildings in any way, but they should ask for permission if they aren’t allowed to be painting on these buildings. This is to let the owner of the building know that they mean no harm to the environment or their workplace. For example, “Adam Cooper, cultural strategy officer for the mayor of London, thinks
You see it everywhere. You see on buses, on walls, on trains, everywhere. It has made many gawk while others just don’t see a reason to it. Graffiti has many connotations, some good and some bad. It’s the thrill that drives these crazy risk-takers to get their names known. Seeing graffiti through the eyes of an artist who only sees his masterpiece. Graffiti has been here longer then you think. Though you may see destruction of property he only see his art and freedom of expression. Being a graffiti artist is about feeling the rush of a finished masterpiece and not getting caught. Some are the quieter type but are still well-known. It has been here since the 1960s.
For the most part the writers can agree that graffiti is vandalism. Some of the writers explicitly say that graffiti is vandalism whereas others allude to it. (Pink par. 4; Olivero par. 1; Wigdahl par. 15; MacDonald par. 3; “Graffiti” par. 2). Wigdahl, MacDonald, Witt and “Graffiti” are supporters of vandalism as the sole definition of graffiti. Witt’s absence of graffiti when positively mentioning public art implies that he does not view graffiti as art but as crime. Whereas the other three actually verbalize their dissent for graffiti. For instance, one article states, “graffiti is property damage plain and simple” (“Graffiti par. 2). Wigdahl and MacDonald make similar accusations.
However, even though graffiti is portrayed as art by many people, some people think that all kinds of graffiti is vandalism. They think that it is a dirty way to destroy a city, and a bad influence to young adults and children growing up. In the article “Vandals hit 18 statues in Grant Park with graffiti” by Carlos Sadovi, public buildings had been covered and nearly destroyed with tags by young teenages. When Sandovi says, “People, especially children, like to go up to the statues and pose with them for pictures and touch them. He said this is the first time they have been vandalized here.” In this case, the children of the city will have to suffer through. People can also argue that the graffiti is a bad influence for the children. However, even though some young teenages decided to vandalize a building, doesn't make graffiti vandalism. There are graffiti artists that even make their paints out of wheat, so that if they
Is graffiti seen as vandalism or a notable art that is used to voice the opinion of many artists? Many are quick to conclude that graffiti is an act of defacing public property, but few are in understanding of what real graffiti is. Graffiti is defined as art that is displayed or created in public spaces. So this presents the question of why some critics believe that graffiti should not be classified as a real subcategory of art. Below is the explanation as to why graffiti needs to be considered among the most prestigious and notable art forms.
Now driving to work or walking down Beale, I look for graffiti. I realized that I answered my own question, “Is graffiti ART?” Yes, it is no matter what my friends say or think. If was the only person in the world that considers graffiti art, then that is what it is. Thankfully, I am not
Graffiti portrays a message whether it’s spelled out on the concrete or hidden behind a sort of code. It lets unheard voices, be heard. There are many different forms of graffiti, tagging is the form of street art that most often results in consequences (Eickmier). This is because tagging is basically signing your nickname on a wall, and once the police figure out your pseudonym they will most likely find you. Graffiti is not always considered to be ugly though, some artists work actually ends up in museums (Wark) A manchester artist who goes by the name “Banksy” ultimately avoided jail because his work was deemed “artistic” He was later given an opportunity to showcase his work in a museum. Graffiti does not
Graffiti can be found everywhere and anywhere. It is a way for people to express themselves and be creative in a public manner. It shows how passionate and talented they can be when it comes to drawing or tagging and have it displayed as a piece of art for everyone to see. Graffiti goes way back to the ancient times and is now very well known in the modern days which makes more and more people interested and fascinated by them. It can be used in different types of ways. Many artists can either spray paint, carve, paste, or stencil them on a surface. From how we see them today they are usually images of random cartoons, big bubbly letters, vintage black and whites or inspirational quotes. Virtually anything colorful or not and big that can be easily spotted. Graffiti is more superior to be known as art than vandalism because it is a self expressing act. People need to be open minded about the images they see and look at the message behind it or else they will immediately criticize and say it is vandalizing property.
Nice and better. Also graffiti gives a little splash of color to cities all around the world.
Graffiti has put a major impact on the way people look at their everyday life. It was not used so much here in the United States but was used overseas. Overseas, graffiti, or street art, was used or played as a sport, just like baseball is Americas sport. There are different laws that are put over there than what there are here. They can get away with some of the things that they paint or make over there. If we tried some of that type of work over here, we would get in trouble and possibly serve time for vandalizing someone else’s property. There are many biased outlooks on graffiti, but it should be considered art in all places because of all the time, effort, and design the artist put into their work.
With the origin of graffiti dating all the way back to ancient civilization in Ancient Romans and Greece, we can see that in the past graffiti was used as a form communicating their names on buildings. Graffiti defined by Oxford is writing, or drawings scribbled, scratched, or sprayed illicitly on a wall or other surface in a public place (Oxford 2017). Many institutions looked at graffiti as being vandalism due to the definition that graffiti is with as being