The United States must make hard decisions as conflict arises between the United States and the Soviet Union. After World War II, the US began to have conflicting views with the Soviet Union which caused a series of proxy wars, one of them occurring in Vietnam. The Soviet Union was trying to make Vietnam one of their satellite nations, a nation that is aligned and under the influence of the Soviet Union, while the US wanted to stop the Soviet Union’s influence on other nations. There were differing view on whether or not the US should intervene in vietnam. An illustration of these differing views is seen in Graham Greene’s novel The Quiet American where Thomas Fowler, a british journalist, believes in remaining uninvolved in vietnam, while …show more content…
Pyle came to Vietnam under the idea that he could protect them, however Fowler correctly understood that the Vietnamese people only wanted to be independent from outside forces. Pyle came to Vietnam under the belief that “there was always a Third Force to be found free from communism and the taint of colonialism… [a] national democracy”(Greene 115) that could free and protect the …show more content…
After seeing the results of the General Thé’s bombs Pyle believed that the vietnamese“were only war casualties… It was a pity, but you can’t always hit your target. Anyway they died in the right cause… they died for democracy” (Greene 171). Pyle’s carefree tone shows how he was fine with the deaths of many innocent Vietnamese people as long as his own selfish goal of stopping communism was achieved. Pyle did not care about the Vietnamese people because he pushed them aside and said that he was doing to for democracy. In the Nation Magazine's Puppets and Patriots, they criticized the US on how it was put “into a position which has become almost habitual, the position of giving support – moral, diplomatic, financial – to a regime whose only virtue is its anti-communism” (Puppets). Nation Magazine’s purpose in writing this was to expose the US’ selfish motives and is shown by their critical tone. This is significant because it shows that the US would support poor leaders, including Diem, who had little support from the vietnamese. This proves how Fowlers perspective was more justified because Pyle did not care about the well being of the Vietnamese and chose to support General Thé even after seeing the damage that he has caused in vietnam, so that he could satisfy his own selfish needs. The US did not truly
Hess argues that the threat of the USSR and Communism “left the US no choice but to stand up to the challenge posed by Vietnam”. Direct confrontation was impossible as the USSR was a nuclear power, therefore the only choice available was “a policy of containment”; previous success in Korea gives validity to this view. Hess states Vietnam was the centre of the “Domino Theory”, that a communist Vietnam “would inexorably lead to the collapse of other non-communist states”. All communist states were believed to be puppets of the USSR so an increase in Soviet allies would tip the global power balance against the US.
Relating to Appy’s claim, as escalation grew after the Tonkin Gulf, America began to wage an unmoral war that was not supported by the Americans and Vietnamese or understood by American soldiers. Agreeing with Appy’s claim, the prime issue of an immoral and unjust war is one that America must realize and understand the full consequences that this has had on the nation if it is to learn any lessons from Vietnam. Originally told that the war was fought to contain communism, bombing campaigns as Operation Rolling Thunder annihilated many villages and the countryside where it was believed that the Viet Cong were stationed. Proven more often than not to be unsuccessful, only to produce the numbers of unidentified Vietnamese bodies and remains that
From “The Other America,” in Major Problems by Michael Harrington is a document that tells of the poverty present in America that is often skillfully and unintentionally concealed and also speaks of Lyndon Johnson’s war on poverty and briefly of how poverty rose during the Reagan administration. After Johnson’s declaration of war on poverty, there was significant change regarding the climate of the social, economic, and political in the America of those times. And while Johnson’s countless social programs helped decrease poverty immensely, it also left a huge number drowning in it still. Later Reagan’s administration would cite George Gilder on the fact that welfare did not reduce poverty but increase it to explain why the levels of poverty rose during the first few months of Reagan’s administration. Democrats and liberals would argue against this and say that poverty
In her book The Vietnam Wars, 1945-1990, author Marilyn Young examines the series of political and military struggles between the United States and Vietnam, a nation that has been distinctively separated as the South and the North. Young chooses to express the daily, weekly, monthly progresses of the affairs collectively called the Vietnam Wars, focusing on the American interventions in the foreign soil. She seeks to provide an answer to a question that has haunted the world for years: What was the reason behind the United States interfering in the internal affairs of a foreign country in which it had no claims at all? Young discloses the overt as well as covert actions undertaken by the U.S. government officials regarding the foreign affairs with Vietnam and the true nature of the multifaceted objectives of each and every person that’s involved had.
As the Vietnam War continued, the North Vietnamese reported on the public opinion in the United States. Specifically the American public’s reaction to any massacre of innocent civilians. After careful research they saw the Americans showing sympathy. Vietnamese then began to orchestrate a program to denigrate the U.S. military. They showed this by saying that the killing of the innocents was not accidental but a policy deliberately fostered by the U.S. High Command in Vietnam. General William Westmoreland was one such person singled out by the
The United States was full of prosperity in the 1950s. The standard of living was higher that it had been in years, and many people were living in luxury. Although there were many who were enjoying the lives they lived, there were also many Americans who were trapped living well below the standard of living. Michael Harrington shed light on this situation when he published The Other America in 1962. In his expose’, Harrington exposed how 40 to 50 million American citizens were living in poverty, and that to most Americans these people were invisible. He expressed how the lifestyle of people living in poverty was so different from those who were not that it created a “culture” of poverty. Harrington believed
The book “The Other America”, written by Michael Harrington, describes poverty in America in the 1950s and 1960s, when America became one of the most affluent and advanced nations in the world. The book was written in 1962, and Harrington states that there were about 50,000,000 (about 25% of the total population) poor in America at that time. The author did extensive research with respect to the family income levels to derive the poverty numbers, and used his own observations and experiences to write this book. This book addresses the reasons for poverty, the nature of poverty, the culture of poverty, the blindness of Middle Class America with respect to poverty, and the responsibility of all Americans in addressing the issue of poverty in America.
it mentioned about the Vietnam War as well as the Indochina War and the involvement of America, British, and French. Alden Pyle, an America CIA that worked under cover, was a symbol of how the American political role took place in Vietnam. Pyle used to be an excellent student at school and he liked to apply what he saw in the books into real life. York Harding was his inspiration. He accepted the theory that he saw in the book of York Harding; he followed and applied the idea to Vietnam and Vietnamese people because he thought that it was true. “York wrote that what the East needed was a Third Force” (17). Pyle wanted to use the Third Force as an ideal form of government to bring democracy to Vietnam. He had trusts in himself that his beliefs
In his book titled “The Vietnam War: A Concise International History,” Mark Lawrence suggests that the United States’ Cold War foreign policy began to play a main portion in Vietnam. U.S. policy at the time was controlled by the domino theory. Which believed that the collapse of North Vietnam to Communism might cause all of Southeast Asia to descent, setting off a type of Communist chain reaction. The reason is that philosophy played a lashing force in policymaking, shows the notion that Vietnam had more to do with the global context of the cold war than it did the country itself. Losing a country of Vietnam to communist rulers in military totalitarianism was an example of failure to the US. Therefore, it was essential for the US to quickly respond in Vietnam’s
He believed that democracy and “the third force” would change the whole situation in Vietnam better and destroy communism and overall had aggravating views on what the United States was doing for the world as he himself was American. Fowler, unlike Pyle, did not have a clear opinion on things and mostly tried to stay neutral. He thought that the thing about Pyle was that he had taken someone’s thoughts about “the third force” and had put them into practice. Fowler on the other hand chose not to take sides at all because he found himself more of a reporter whose job is to report events and situations. However he eventually formed his opinion based on different situations that he had seen and after seeing the explosion organized by the General
They believe that they are not causing any serious harm because they are different in their cause. That is what American exceptionalism encompasses. Pyle and those like him want to be the ones who save Vietnam: the heroes. They choose to ignore the costs in the hopes that they will benefit the nation in the end. As long as their forces eliminate communism and all traces of it, they will believe that have succeeded, despite the harm they caused along the
As a war narrative, Greene's novel introduces the reader to modern warfare, the French use of napalm, the local warlord in the form of General, the guerilla mode of the Viet Minh, predecessors of the Viet Cong. Fowler's witnessing of a dive-bombing of a sampan and a street massacre using bicycle bombs have strong contemporary resonances to "embedded" journalists and the Middle East situation. As a political document, it anticipates developments that have come to dominate global politics, especially the use by the US of the domino theory to justify intervention in Vietnam (as in Cuba and Chile). It reflects the Cold War focus on crushing communism and then the new colonialism of spreading a particular definition and form of democracy. As a character study, the novel develops a detailed portrait and makes a close examination of the psychology of men, competition and ageing. The love triangle brings this into sharper focus, but Fowler's reactions to Pyle reveal a kind of alter-ego relationship. Pyle sees Fowler as cynical but straight, which is not totally accurate in his desperate bid to hold on to Phuong. Pyle seems more self-convinced but also far from innocent. He dies for his cause, believing he protects both a woman and a country, but without the honor he naively prizes. He represents an agent and sets the precedent for state-backed terrorism - making it unsurprising that Noyce's film of The Quiet American was shelved in September
“Whatever the motives for conflict, they are incorporated in individual attitudes and expressed in popular opinion.” (Albig 1939, 139) It has often been argued that Defence Secretary Robert McNamara “has done more to shape that conflict than anyone outside the Viet Cong” (Kennedy 1993, 93). This is an important illustration of the power of the media; through the media, “The domino theory [was] the dominant interpretation of events in Indochina” (Schulzinger 1998, 88).
“Defeat in Vietnam has left the United States deeply divided” (Hallin, 1986:3). The Vietnam War became a major Cold War conflict in the 1960s period. This essay will evaluate the following question; what are the main reasons for the United States (US) defeat in the Vietnam War? The research was done through the qualitative research method which included books, journals and articles. This essay will argue that the main reasons for the US defeat in the Vietnam War was because of their inefficient tactics, inexperienced soldiers, and both international and home pressure. This research is important because the question has not been answered to its fullest extent. Additionally, it provides evidence that countries with powerful nuclear weapons and
How long can you sit on the fence and not get involved? How long before you're forced to choose sides? Thomas Fowler learns the answers to this dilemma the hard way.