Cass00uiu@yahoo.com
Group Assignments
Week #2 (Case 34pg 139-140 inside the ref)
Complete Group Case 3-33 on page 138. Make sure to answer the questions completely and show all computations with proper labeling if required.
Explain how shaving 5% off the estimated direct labor-hours in the base for the predetermined overhead rate usually results in a big boost in net operating income at the end of the fiscal year. Should Terri Ronsin go along with the general manager’s request to reduce the direct labor-hours in the predetermined overhead rate computation to 420,000 direct labor-hours?
Shaving 5% off the estimated direct labor-hours in the predetermined overhead rate will result in an artificially high overhead rate. The
…show more content…
a. What is the break-even point in units for each product?
b. If the company sells exactly the break-even quantity of each product, what will be the overall profit of the company? Explain this result.
Case 6-32 (Case 6-35 pg 333-341) 1. The overall break-even sales can be determined using the CM ratio. | | Velcro | Metal | Nylon | Total | | Sales | $165,000 | $300,000 | $340,000 | $805,000 | | Variable expenses | 125,000 | 140,000 | 100,000 | 365,000 | | Contribution margin | $ 40,000 | $160,000 | $240,000 | 440,000 | | Fixed expenses | | | | 400,000 | | Net operating income | | | | $ 40,000 |
2. The issue is what to do with the common fixed cost when computing the break-evens for the individual products. The correct approach is to ignore the common fixed costs. If the common fixed costs are included in the computations, the break-even points will be overstated for individual products and managers may drop products that in fact are profitable. a. The break-even points for each product can be computed using the contribution margin approach as follows: | | Velcro | Metal | Nylon | | Unit selling price | $1.65 | $1.50 | $0.85 | | Variable cost per unit | 1.25 | 0.70 | 0.25 | | Unit contribution margin (a) | $0.40 | $0.80 | $0.60 | |
The current cost system allocates overhead costs once a year, as a function of direct labor dollars. This allocation strategy results in:
d) Break even sales change that would change the profits by the same amount as a reduction in price.
Breakeven Analysis for Product Tylenol Approach 1 - Same price as Tylenol Approach 2a - Cheaper than Tylenol Approach 2b - Cheaper w/lowered trade cost $ $ $ $ Unit Cost (Variable Cost) 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 Trade Cost (Selling Price to Retailers) $ 1.69 $ 1.69 $ 1.05 $ 0.70 Fixed Cost (Advertising) 2,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 Break-Even Quantity [Fixed Cost/(Trade Cost-Unit Cost)] 1,834,862 5,504,587 13,333,333 60,000,000 Contribution Margin (Unit) 64% 64% 43% 14%
5. Determine the necessary sales in unit and dollars to break-even or attain desired profit using the break-even formula.
The sales-value at splitoff method captures the benefits-received criterion of cost allocation and is the preferred method. The costs of processing a chicken are allocated to products in proportion to the ability to contribute revenue. Chicken Little’s decision to process chicken is heavily influenced by the revenues from breasts and thighs. The bones provide relatively few benefits to Chicken Little despite their high physical volume.
To find the break-even point for napkins, you use the same formula. The fixed cost is still $420,000.00. The selling price of napkins is $7.00. The variable cost is $4.50. $7.00 minus $4.50 is $2.50. So then you take $420,000.00 and divide it by $2.50 to find the breaking point of $168,000.00. The company will have to sell $168,000.00 to break even in sales. The margin for safety for napkins is -$48,000.00. This is found by subtracting the actual or expected cost of $120,000.00 by the break-even point of $168,000.00. You can cut sales by $48,000.00 and not sustain a loss.
Because each product has a different contribution margin percentage, the volume required for each break-even point would be different and will not add up to the company’s overall break-even volume of 1,100,000 units; the overall break-even volume assumes that there is only one contribution margin percentage which is :
In our second assumption, instead of using the cost of goods per cases in 1986, we try to use the percentage it counts in the total expenses which is 50.4% and to find the sales needed to break-even. The detail of the calculation is shown in the answer for questions d. The result is that 95,635, a little bit higher than the estimated sales of 90,000.
1) Increasing commercial prices to $1,000 per hour believing that demand would be reduced by 30%
Please register as a student and use the following link to access the cases (only the questions for the first case are shown below):
Question 4: Calculate each of the three products’ break even points using the data. Why is the sum of these three volumes not equal to the 1,100,000 unit’s aggregate break-even volume?
It is particularly interesting to note that the higher the fixed costs, the higher the break-even point. Thus, companies with large investments in equipment and/or high administrative-line ratios may require greater sales to break even.
When price is $20.6, the quantity is 1,242,425 and profit is $101, we come near to break even point.
While cost is seldom the only criterion used in a make-or-buy decision, simple break-even analysis can be an effective way to quickly surmise the
Break Even Point in Sales = (Total Fixed Costs + Target Profit) ÷ Contribution Margin Ratio