Gun control is a controversial issue in United States. Gun control concerns with the government regulation of the use of guns and ownership by private citizens. People who think the United States needs gun control are mainly democrats; they believe that gun control would reduce the number of accidents related to the guns as well as the violence. However, some people oppose to gun control, and these people are mainly republicans, believe that gun control will not take guns away from the criminals or gangsters and in addition, it is against the law which gives the right of residents to bear arms. Guns are a very controversial issue in United States. There are numerous reasons to support both sides on the issue. This paper will discuss how gun …show more content…
They claim regulating guns is an infringement on their rights as American citizens because they read the Second Amendment as giving them the right to bear arms. However, regardless of how the Amendment is interpreted, the need for gun control is still there. The framers of the Constitution could have never imagined the amount of violence in today’s society. The anti–gun activists counter this by giving the need for self-defense from criminals, it is their Constitutional right to form a militia and protect themselves. However, in one case the Supreme Court ruled that the National Guard is the militia spoken of in the Constitution, therefore the right to own guns does not lie with individual citizens. Gun control for individual security is also a major part of their argument in needing to own guns. However, by again looking at studies and statistics, their argument seems to be invalid. For example, statistics have shown that those who attempt to use their guns in self-defense are often ineffective, and are 8 times more likely to be killed than those who do not make any effort to defend themselves are. Another study has shown that “a firearm in the home is 43 times more likely to be used for suicide or a murder than self-defense”. The extent, to which guns are used as they were meant to be as stated in the Constitution, is far outweighed by the extent to which they are …show more content…
The Brady Act was put in use to provide for a waiting period, just before the purchase of a handgun for the establishment of a national instant criminal background check system to be contacted by firearms dealers before the transfer of any firearm. Some people say that the Brady Act helped to reduce the crime rate of crimes since 69,000 handgun sales were blocked in 1997 because the buyer had a felony conviction (Gun Control, CNS News). “Also the first year that the Brady Act was put into place, it prevented 4,365 criminals from purchasing a gun which makes feel safer” (Sommers, 68). Besides, the Brady Act can also prevent known terrorist from buying huge dangerous weapons such as a .50 caliber sniper rifle which can be more than capable of shooting down an airplane as it took off or landed (Sommers,150). The Brady Act properly is crucial in the protection of our citizens. However, some others think that the Brady Act did nothing towards the crimes that involved
Gun control in the U.S has been a highly talked about topic the past couple of years. Through the development of technology and social media; many people across the country have been more involved in voicing their opinions about this issue. America is known as the land of the free, many people take pride in being able to bare arms. However, this right has been abused by not only civilians, but law enforcement as well. The United States has the 31st highest rate of gun violence in the world and it is not decreasing anytime soon. The phrase “America's largest mass shooting” has been reassigned to numerous occurrences that have taken place over the past decade. It is apparent that through these tragedies it is time for a serious change, innocent lives are being lost for no reason.
The United States has 88.8 guns per 100 people, or about 270,000,000 guns, which is the highest total and per capital number in the world. 22% of Americans own one or more guns (35% of men and 12% of women). America's pervasive gun culture stems in part from its colonial history, revolutionary roots, frontier expansion, and the Second Amendment, which states: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Proponents of more gun control laws state that the Second Amendment was intended for militias; that gun violence would be reduced; that gun restrictions have always existed; and that a majority of Americans, including gun owners, support new gun restrictions.
The debate over gun control has been raging through the American political systems for years. On one side, there is the National Rifle Association (NRA) and 2nd Amendment-citing citizens who use their firearms for hunting and self-defense. On the other, there is Handgun Control Inc. (HCI) and followers of the Brady Campaign who want to ban guns on the basis that they are dangerous. Both sides have strong arguments, anchored in historical precedent and statistical analysis. Anti-gun control lobbyists’ arguments include the guarantee of the 2nd Amendment, the definition of “militia” as any adult male, self-defense, the relative uselessness of permits and regulations, and court cases in favor of firearm possession. Pro-gun control activists
The argument in this article is President Trump signaled support for one piece of gun control legislation on Monday, five days after a mass shooting at a Florida high school left 17 people dead and scores injured. "The president is supportive of efforts to improve the federal background check system," Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House press secretary, wrote in a statement Monday morning. After a mass shooting in Las Vegas last year, officials said they were studying a ban on bump stocks, an attachment that allows a rifle to fire more frequently. Over the weekend at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, Trump weighed gun control measures in conversations with friends, according to people who spoke to him. Trump has faced two of the country's
un control is a very controversial topic especially in today's society; whether gun control is good or bad is a very talked about subject especially when it comes to the United States. This is a very touchy subject because guns are a part of a lot of people's daily lives. People that are anti gun control believe that no one should be able to put any restrictions on guns. They believe that people should be able to buy a firearm just like a pair of boots or a tool. They also believe that if someone were able to take away the firearms from the law abiding citizens that just leaves firearms in the hands of people that do not abide by the law and leaves them defenseless. In 1791 our founding fathers gathered and ratified the Second amendment. The
I think that there should be more gun control laws because it can help in the future. Even though many people already own guns and they can't be taken away because of the Second Amendment, it can prevent those who shouldn't own a gun from buying one. Implementing more laws would make it harder to own a gun, which can prevent many attacks and deaths. Even though more gun control laws won’t eliminate attacks are mass shootings completely, it will help lower the number of attacks and save more lives. Having these laws may not seem like it can do much now, but it will make it harder to get a gun in in the future and lower the chances of it falling into the wrong hands.
Gun control is a very controversial topic for Americans. Many feel that due to the recent tragedies, Congress should enforce stronger gun control law while others believe that banning assault weapons will not help reduce crimes. In the article titled, “Treasure the Second Amendment, but Ban Assault Rifles”, Miller argues that assault weapons should be banned, but the second amendment right to bare arms should be valued. While in the article titled, “A Ban on Assault Weapons Would Not Reduce Crime”, Merino argues that banning assault weapons would not lower the crime rate because most criminals will just find a loophole.
The segment of American politics know as gun control came about in the 20th century with the passing of the National Firearms Act (NFA) in 1934. Congress passed this act in response to Prohibition-era gangs and the extreme violence that they caused. With the passage of the NFA the federal government set into motion the beginning of gun politics in America. The history of modern gun control has been fiercely fought in and out of the courts by parties on both sides of the issue with several key court rulings. Gun control politics is primarily made up of two sides with several groups on both sides. On the one side you have gun rights activists and the other you have the gun control activists.
As Boss (2017) mentions, The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (p. 164). Gun control has always been a controversial issue. Due to shootings related to culture, schools, robberies, movie theatres, and accidents, guns have become an object of violence, fear, and danger. All people have been affected by gun violence or have heard of an event related to gun violence. The two articles that will be analyzed are Erik Gilbert’s “Stop Worrying About Guns in the Classroom. They’re Already Here” and a testimony by Mark Kelly “Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing on Gun Violence on Gun Violence on January 30, 2013”. After comparing arguments through different premises from both articles, one essay will be chosen superior to the other.
I believe that Pro Gun control is the right choice, if you watch any news show, every other day there is at least one story involving a gun related crime in some shape or form. And most of the time that same gun, that's being reported, was used to harm another human being,or more than one person. Both sides of the story are constantly bickering about the matter. Those who believe in that there should be gun control are simply outnumbered by those who don’t. On top of that, every year the number of guns the U.S rises and as a result gun related crimes also rise. The situation may become too large for us to handle, no gun control will lead to more gun crimes and anyone could be a victim. We need gun control, so that we can discourage potential
It is human nature for people to fight for what they believe in, and for some the debate about firearm ownership is a battle worth fighting. Lately In the United States of America, some controversy has arisen over the idea of gun control and laws enforcing tighter rules on weaponry. There are two split sides. The ones who support the idea of gun control and those who oppose the gun restriction laws. People who support gun control laws believe that the laws will help prevent gun violence, whereas those who are against the laws want to protect themselves and their belongings.
Gun control has become a huge political topic after the numerous violent killings in recent years. It has been debated whether gun control policies should be more lenient or more restrictive to best protect the American public. Many studies have been conducted in comparison to other countries that have stricter gun laws showing that crime has not dropped with increased gun control measures, nor has it affected a decline in homicide rates. Other reports have shown that countries with more lenient gun policies have been able to prevent criminals from committing crimes against armed citizens. Enacting strict gun policies would create an environment where crime rates would rise. Guns are only a tool used in killing people and assisting in
Gun control has been a controversial subject in the country for many years. Should we make guns illegal or not? Should people be allowed to have guns on school campus? The states are still in control of their own gun laws and recently Georgia has decided to pass the House Bill 280, also known as the “campus carry” law, which went in effect July 1st. This law allows students, who are over 21, to carry their concealed weapon to any public college campus. Whether this was the right choice is still up to debate.
One of the main problems that we have as a community is the right to obtain firearms and the use of these firearms. There are two sides of this argument and this project will try to focus on both sides. Alongside the idea of anti-gun control, people feel that there God given right to bear arms/2nd amendment is being manipulated. The argument begins to come when the weapon control activist begins to question our right to have and carry these firearms.
The topic of gun control has created controversy among the public and political parties, each with different views among them. I for one am for the 2nd Amendment, to a point. I feel like all law abiding citizens have the right to own a gun to protect their families. After all the mass shootings something more needs to be done to help control these violent acts.