preview

Hammurabi Dbq Analysis

Decent Essays

Hammurabi’s code comes with punishments and rewards, these punishments and rewards make Hammurabi’s code unjust and just. Hammurabi’s code is one the worlds oldest sets of laws. These laws were written by Hammurabi, the king of Babylon, in the 18th century BCE. Based on the documents, Hammurabi’s code offers harsh punishments for mistakes, and nicer rewards. This essay will examine the punishments of Hammurabi’s code, as well as the rewards, and decide whether to not it is just. The punishments of the 282 laws of Hammurabi’s code can be very harsh and they depend on what crime was committed (Doc A). One example is (doc C, law 129) “If a married lady is caught [in adultery] with another man, they shall bind them and cast them into the water,” …show more content…

Consider your reward for not breaking the law is not getting punished. In the various documents we have analyzed the punishments, and now it is time to analyze the few rewards in Hammurabi’s code. “If a man has married a wife and a disease has seized her, if he is determined to marry a second wife, he shall marry her. He shalt not divorce the wife whom the disease seized. She shall dwell in the house they have built together, and he shall maintain her as long as she lives,” (doc C, law 148). For the man this is a reward, he gets to marry another women, even thought he is already married. “If the robber is not caught, the man who has been robbed shall formally declare whatever he has lost before a god, and the city and the mayor in whose territory or district the robbery has been committed shall replace for him whatever he has lost,” (doc D, law 23). This is a reward for the man who has been robbed because whatever he has lost in the robbery will be replaced by the mayor. “If a man has borrowed money to plant his fields and a storm has flooded his field or carried away the crop, … in that year he does not have to pay his creditor,” (doc D, law 48). This is a huge reward for the man because if a flood has carried away his crops then he doesn’t have to pay his creditor for a year. The next law (doc E, law 199) is somewhat of a reward for the man, but not so good on the slaves side. “If a man had knocked out the eye of a slave … …show more content…

Hammurabi’s code was just. Today it may not seem just, but for the time period that the codes were written in it is just. “I set up my precious words, writen upon my memorial stone, before the image of me as the king of righteousness,” (doc B). Hammurabi thought out the codes, he wrote these codes to protect the weak (doc A). He didn’t write a bunch of cruel laws, he has a reason for writing these laws and purpose to protect. People were afraid of the punishments to come from committing a crime, therefore the crimes were not committed because there was fear of what might come (doc C). Hammurabi’s code was just, it was just for the time period it was written in, it served has protection for the weak, and it made anyone thinking of committing a crime fear of what may happen after they have committed the

Get Access