Hammurabi’s Code Was Just Have you ever wondered what the consequences for cheating on your husband back in Babylonian times? Would the consequences be more, or less harsh than consequences in modern times? Hammurabi wrote laws, called Hammurabi’s Code for the people of Babylonia. For example, if a woman cheats on her husband, Hammurabi’s Code says that they shall be tied up, and thrown into the water. Hammurabi’s personal injury laws were just, because the people who did wrong deserve the punishments for their actions. His family laws are just as well, because again, the wrongdoers deserve punishment. Hammurabi wrote these laws to keep everything running smoothly, and to keep his city in order. After all, Hammurabi’s code was just, because …show more content…
For example, in Document C, law 129 basically says that if a married woman is caught having an affair with another man, they will tie them up, and throw them both in the water. This law is just to the victim (The woman’s actual husband), because obviously the wife was cheating on him, but it is unjust to the victim, because the man might have not loved the woman, and did not care that she cheated. This law was just to the accused woman, because she had to have known that cheating on her husband was against the law, and it was unjust to the woman, because they couple may have not loved each other, and the husband may have given her permission to go out with someone else. In my opinion, even if he gave her permission, she shouldn’t have done it anyway, because it’s disrespectful to her actual husband.Another law that shows just family laws, is Document C, law 148, which basically says that if a man marries a wife and she gets sick, then if he wants to marry a second wife, then he can marry her, but he cannot divorce the 1st wife that he still has. The 1st wife has to live in the house that the husband and his new second wife, as long as she lives. This law is just to the victim (The 1st wife), because she cannot get divorced, and she still has someone to take care of her after he has his his 2nd wife, but it’s unjust to the victim, because she has to live with her husband and his 2nd wife, which is probably pretty uncomfortable. This law is just to the accused man, because he can have a new wife that is useful and not sick, and he can have more women to work around the house, but it’s unjust to the accused man, because he has to care for a woman that he most likely doesn’t really love anymore, since he has 2 wives now. In conclusion, Hammurabi’s Code laws referring to family laws, are
Hammurabi’s code is believed to be the first form of written law. It consists of a set of 282 laws written by Hammurabi, the king of Babylon circa 1792 BCE, that established a written social contract amongst the people of Babylonia. It was written on a stone stele that stands more than eight feet tall and weighs over 4 tons (doc A). According to the stele, Hammurabi was instructed to create the code by Shamash, the god of justice (doc B). However, it introduces conflicting ideas about justice that are arguable to this day. Were his rules unethical or his punishments too severe? Hammurabi’s code may be seen as unfair by today’s standards, but in solving matters that involve family, property, and health issues of his time, Hammurabi’s code was just because it utilizes negative reinforcement to implement positive results in society.
When it comes to property laws, I think that the laws to Hammurabi’s code was unjust. For example, in Document D Law 21, it states that: “If a man has broken through a wall [to rob] a house, they shall put him to death..., or hang him in the hole...” This law is unjust to the victim because if the accused is hung on the hole, than the victim will have to deal with a dead body hung on to the hole in the wall. This is completely unfair to the accused because although the accused tried to rob a house, he/she would be given a harsh punishment which is not only cruel but unnecessary. Law 23
Drowning, cutting off hands, and hangings were all punishments in Hammurabi’s code. Given to him by Shamash, the god of justice, the code was carved on a stone stele and consisted of 282 laws. The laws were just for Hammurabi’s time period, but they would not be considered just by today’s standards. Compared to people today, Hammurabi and his subjects have a more impulsive mindset; their society is adverse to the works of society today. In that case it is expected that certain components, like laws, will be viewed differently over time.
The worst form of injustice is pretended justice. A man named Hammurabi was named king in 1792 BCE for the kingdom of Babylonia in Ancient Mesopotamia where he ruled for 42 years. In his 38th year of rule, he created 282 laws carved on a stele in cuneiform, after his thoughts on peace and justice increased. He called them, Hammurabi’s Code. The set of rules were there for everyone to follow, but was always being questioned for the justice of the laws.
“An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind” This quote by Mahatma Gandhi means that if someone does something bad to us, we shouldn’t do the same thing to them. Hammurabi, who was king of the Babylonian Empire from 1792 to 1750 BC was most famous for his code of laws that governed all parts of Mesopotamian life. His laws are important because they were the first laws that applied to everyone, although they still didn’t treat everyone the same. Hammurabi’s code is unjust because it doesn’t treat everyone the same, some punishments are too harsh, and because it doesn’t take into account intent, or why someone did the crime, whether it was on purpose or on accident.
A life for a life. King Hammurabi became the ruler of Babylon in 1792. Hammurabi had created 292 laws. He had a total of 3,500 lines of writing, covering both sides of the steele. I am going to be discussing, Is hammurabi's code just? Before we answer the question I will tell you what “just” means. Just simply means “fair”. I believe that hammurabi’s code was just. In this essay, I will be discussing hammurabi’s code being just. I will be giving reasons for hammurabi’s code being just.
In 1750 B.C. a new king of babylonia arose by the name of Hammurabi. He continued his reign up until 1792 B.C. but most importantly his reign did not go unforgotten. During his reign he was in charge of giving punishments to the wrongdoings of his citizens. As he conquered other cities and his empire grew he saw the need to unify groups he controlled, he was concerned about keeping order in his kingdom. In order to achieve this goal, he needed one universal set of laws for all the people he conquered thus he created the Hammurabi code.
Hammurabi's code was just, because it protected people and was fair. For most of the 282 laws in hammurabi's code they were in the best interest of helping and protecting the week, sick, poor, and the vast majority of babylonia. The laws were mostly fair to the people because usually the punishment was something of equal or greater harm than which the crime was committed. The only concern of mine is how harsh some laws were, because the punishment was way worse than the crime, but it was in a good cause so if the punishment was not death that the criminal was taught a good lesson, and if it was death the people didn't have to worry about the criminal that was killed because the criminal would be dead.
Throughout time many civilizations and societies have come and gone. Every one of them was unique in their own way and had a different way of governing themselves. In this paper, I will be focusing on Hammurabi’s Code. Hammurabi’s Code is a series of laws that governed the Babylonian society back, when they were created, in 1780 BCE. The code was wrote by Hammurabi himself, back when he ruled the Empire of Babylon. The text itself explains why the code was created and why Hammurabi was chosen to write the code. The code then lists, in an organized fashion, all the rules that the society is to follow and what the punishments are if the rules are broken. Every rule is very specific about what is to happen if the rule has to be enforced. Hammurabi’s Code gives us an idea of how the justice system worked in the Babylonian society, how men and women in the society were treated, and how the religion was followed.
Laws are usually inspired and taken from the common knowledge of the society, whether the common knowledge was good or bad it does not make a difference. To illustrate, common laws derive from ethical backgrounds passed through generation to generation, where they feel that these traditions are sacred, and they cannot change it, because they fear the resistance that might develop form that change. Similarly, any religion after certain time gets to change in the name of modernity and prestige. To explain more, Hammurabi
Nearly 4,000 years ago, a man named Hammurabi became king of babylonia. He ruled for 42 years. During that time, he became the ruler of much of Mesopotamia, which had an estimated population of 1,000,000 people or more. In his 38th year, Hammurabi made a set of 282 laws called a code that he had engraved on a stone stele. He did this to bring order and fairness to all. There has been some debate about the justness of this code. In my opinion, Hammurabi’s code was not just because of it’s family law, property law, and personal injury law.
Examples of Injustice can first be found in the area of Family Law. Document C law #195, “ If a son has struck his father his hands should be cut off.” This is unjust because the punishment is much to severe. There should be a punishment but not to cut off the kids hands because then he would be worthless to society for the rest of his life. Document C law #129 If a married woman were to be caught with another man, then they would be wrapped together and casted into the water to die. Once again this is unjust because the punishment is much to severe. I agree that there should be a punishment but not one so large as death if it was the first time they did it.
[Documents C, D, E] These laws were not fair because they could cut your hands off! Sometimes you get paid very little for you dead child! Your father could even disown you if you behave wrong! This is why his laws were very harsh and unjust. The first thing I am going to talk about is the family law.
Theses are personal injury law, family law, and property law. Examples of injustice can be found in the personal injury law. First, Hammurabi states in the epilogue that he made the laws to protect the weakest in society. (Doc B)
Hammurabi's Code Hammurabi made a code it was cruel but fair, Hammurabi ruled Babylonia around 4,000 years ago. In 42 years Hammurabi became ruler of nearly 1,000,000 people. Also, Hammurabi made a law code of 282 laws after he had already ruled for 38 years. Hammurabi believed in an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. finally , out of all of the Mesopotamian kings he had the most complete code.