Universities all over the country have had some similar conflicts. No one really knows what needs to happen to get them to end. These protesters have been violent and nonviolent. Nonviolent protesters could be protected by their freedom of speech, but so could the violent ones. Knowing that violent protesting needs to be put to an end, police officials are not really sure how they should go about it. The protests at Universities have made heads turn, while government officials are contemplating on what they should do to help keep the students and speakers safe. Hate speech and free speech have some differences. According to the Merriam Webster Dictionary, hate speech is defined as a, “speech that is intended to insult, offend, or intimidate a person because of some trait” (Merriam Webster Dictionary). Freedom of speech is, “the right to express information, ideas, and opinions free of government restrictions” (Merriam Webster Dictionary). These terms have parallel but contrasting meanings. Everyone has their freedom of speech. Anyone can speak their opinions without worries. Fighting words or hate speech is protected as long as there is no violence according to Kathleen Ann Ruane, a Legislative Attorney. Different college universities are needing to lay out some regulations to their protests so that they can have a safer environment. The University of California Berkeley had some protests pertaining to Ben Shapiro, a speaker they had early in September. There were no
With a wide variety of people on colleges campuses, it is almost impossible to please everybody; whether it comes to class times, bus schedules, or grading rules, somebody is upset. As well as these smaller issues, more controversial arguments come into play. One of these arguments is against free speech zones on college campuses. These zones restrict speech to a specific area on campus, however, still allowing any type of group to express their beliefs to anybody passing. Some claim these zones as unconstitutional because it restricts a student’s right to free speech. However, others view the zones as helpful in controlling protests and current tensions on campus. Open speech across campus is incredibly difficult to monitor because of the enormous size of current day campuses and the immense amount of different views. In the past, there have been situations relating to violent protesting and negative speech across campuses. Because of this, campuses have begun enforcing free speech zones in which students and faculty may verbally express their beliefs.
Despite their opinions, free speech was a great way in this situation for students to rally together and publically inform the rest of campus of their beliefs. In the school newspaper, The Daily Emerald, CJ Ciaramelle wrote “About 300 students from across the campus community — student unions, Greek Life, the ASUO, the Survival Center, the Women’s Center — showed up at the meeting to protest the Forum” (1). Although the majority of people protested against the forum the right to free speech, it is important because it allows students to make decisions on their own and invite students to do the same.
In 2017 alone, there have been multiple riots born of originally peaceful protests. Students in Middlebury College in Vermont revolted at a peaceful debate with far-right Charles Murray. While Murray tried to reach his building, a mob formed, forcing him and his debate-partner, Allison Stanger, to move to another building (Beinhart np). When Murray and Stanger tried to leave, they and the car they were in were attacked by students. The leftist Stanger was sent to the emergency room because she tried to protect the guest (Fatzick np). In Berkeley, California, students were up in arms, wanting to prevent Milo Yiannopoulos from speaking. Their haste to silence a man they disagreed with led to a huge disaster. In the streets, fellow classmates were attacked. One student who supported President Trump was brutally beaten, and an innocent bystander who claimed to be Muslim was assaulted for “looking like a Nazi” (Ramaiyer np). Others were beset upon as well, with pepper-spray, matches, and baseball bats. In total, only one person was arrested (French np). Unless this one person attacked this many people and businesses, it’s safe to assume that dozens of perpetrators have gone unpunished for the crime of hurting a human being! This ‘free speech’ is not protected under the First Amendment. People are hurting other people. Another time Mr. Yiannopoulos attempted to give a speech, protesters rudely barged into the lecture
Throughout history, the United States Constitution has been put to the test over the issue of free speech. The First Amendment states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Even though free speech is one of the core American values proudly embedded in each citizen, some poopAmericans find themselves torn between whether or not to limit the freedom of speech on behalf of hate speech. Most law-abiding citizens disagree with hate speech, but must realize even speech that promotes hate, racism, and even crime
“Free Inquiry? Not on Campus” by John Leo is an important essay that shows exactly how important it is to protect people's political views and opinions. In Leo's essay, he elaborates how times have changed and how we live in more of a liberal left-wing society and because of this everyone has to be more politically correct. Leo talks about the social change universities and colleges on how they used to promote free speech, but now are more like the speech police telling us what's opinions you should have on any given subject and any other opinion is considered wrong. Leo gives an example of this and writes “in October 2007, for instance, a student mob stormed a Columbia University stage, shutting down speeches by two members of the Minutemen, an anti-illegal immigration group.The students shouted they have no right to
Court Decision(s): The Court ruled in favor of the students. In accordance with the First Amendment, their actions were constitutional. It was not disruptive, nor did it invade other’s rights. However, this did not give unlimited freedom of speech to the students. As long as they continued the “peaceful” protesting without causing distractions, they could continue.
The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) made a statement “On Freedom of Expression and Campus Speech Codes,” 1994, which states, “In response to verbal assaults and use of hateful language some campuses have felt it necessary to forbid the expression of racist, sexist, homophobic, or ethnically demeaning speech, along with conduct or behavior that harasses…”
For example, protestors barricade the university's gates, burned (Zinser and Spilman) statues around campus. As the protest continued, people involved took their march onto capital hall. Gallaudet University couldn’t start classes for a full week as protesters wouldn't allow classes to resume while this debacle was taking place.
Hate speech is a term of art in legal and political theory that is used to refer to verbal conduct – and other symbolic, communicative action –which willfully attacks a person or group based on attributes such as race, religion, ethnic origin, sexual orientation, disability, or gender. Hate speech thus includes things like identity-prejudicial abuse and harassment, certain uses of slurs and epithets, some extremist political and religious speech. For example, statements to the effect that all Muslims are terrorists, or that gay people are second -class human beings, and certain displays of hate symbols like swastikas or burning crosses are part of it. Those such activities are classified as hate speech if, and insofar as, they convey the idea that belonging to a particular social group warrants someone’s being held in or treated with contempt. However, Freedom of speech is the most important and basic right that a human in every country deserves. Freedom of speech and hate speech are two opposite things. Therefore, the government needs to draw a line between hate speech and freedom of speech to protect a citizen. Hate speech should be banned and extreme speech regulated because it is one of the reasons for many negative consequences in human lives
As the First Amendment protects the freedom of speech to all Americans, there needs to be some sort of limit on when students go overboard. There are many different types of speech in which it can cause disruptions in the classroom when teachers and students state their own opinions that don’t always go with what the others agree with. Things such as the place of where they speak these things are affective to whether their claims are legal or illegal on any school campus. When students cause a disruption, even across the street from a school supervised event while promoting illegal drug use like Joseph Frederick did, it needs to be stopped as soon as possible whether it goes against the freedom of a student's speech or not.
Police were there as enforcement to put a stop to the walkouts. The school board didn’t like the idea, and it took them 3 weeks to actually agree to meet with the student’s parents. Police then arrested thirteen young men and indicted them with conspiracy
People protest everyday. it gives them a voice for other people can be informed, for the reason they’re protesting. Colleges/Universities should be gladly be open for a peaceful protest. the reason is because colleges/universities is the place where one can learn, and be open about
Over 100 universities had rallies and demonstrations. The article also highlights the different protests on fourteen different campuses across the country. Many of the students asked for equality on campuses, others asked that buildings be renamed, and for racial discrimination on campus to be addressed.
The way they are protesting is their legal right, to freedom of speech.it guarantees the right to speak of how you feel or need to get out and to express what they need to. This also proves that with the freedom of speech if we feel the need or think that something is off we should be able to tell whoever is starting this or against it that everyone has a say because of freedom of speech. This is them exercising the right of speaking because of freedom of speech. So there for this is an appropriate form of
Free Speech is one of the founding statutes of America, and it is interesting to be the want to paint the use of it as hate mongering. The articles given are complementary in “Free Speech Fight Now About Smearing Right as Racists” they offer the argument that all these protesters are trying to do is paint the right as racists and then in the article from CNN they claim just that. Costello does condemn the violent acts of the protesters but seats the blame clearly on the opinions and platform of the speakers invited. Massive amounts of the mainstream media dedicate all their time to painting the right as racists as if that is the sole majority of their group. These protests at Berkeley just go forward in trying to silence those with disagreements