“Program sustainability or survival is increasingly recognized as an important outcome of health programs. Substantial resources are often committed to community-based health programs, yet programs are often short- lived” (Mermelstein, Sporer, Emery & Curry, 2009). For maintaining a viable health promotion program it is very important to understand the different factors that will affect the sustainability of the program. “Planning for sustainability requires, first, a clear understanding of the concept of sustainability and operational indicators that may be used in monitoring sustainability over time. Important categories of indicators include: (1) maintenance of health benefits achieved through an initial program, (2) level of institutionalization …show more content…
It depends a lot on community leaders as to how much priority they give towards tobacco cessation programs for youths. Awareness of the issue in community is another major factor in success of a program. In some communities and cultures there is lack of public awareness of ill effects of tobacco smoking. Program has to be culturally relevant. The infrastructure has to be great for adolescent smoking interventions. Legislature is weak in controlling tobacco sales. Smoking taxes can be further increased to discourage smoking among youths. There is a lack of local capacity to implement the program in all schools. There is lack of cost data. Staff time in schools need to be considered. Adolescent’s family life and social structure needs to be considered. The reduced budgets of many state tobacco control programs make it difficult to maintain staff and infrastructure (LaPelle, Zapka, & Ockene, 2006). The planning begins by identifying who will use the program: who will adopt it, who will implement it, and who will be responsible for sustaining the program over time. A reassessment of the planning group is necessary to ensure representation of potential program adopters and implementers (Bartholomew et al., 2009. p.506). We’re not able to asses or collect data from the program participants.so the efficacy of the program was …show more content…
Recruit and retain more students for program services through screening. Build new initiatives and utilize more networking at state and local levels. Work as a team to build new partnerships with local health centers and physicians. Utilize families into interventions and for support. Work together to build new partnerships on common issues like tobacco cessation. Utilize media and press releases to create appropriate messages for adolescents. In schools utilize nurses for tobacco counselling. “We suggest that the potential influences on sustainability may derive from three major groups of factors: (1) project design and implementation factors, (2) factors within the organizational setting, and (3) factors in the broader community environment”(Shediac-Rizkallah, & Bone ,1998). In today’s world technology plays an important role in sustainability of a program. “Technical assistance and training (TAT) is widely used to transfer knowledge and technology and to, assist states, locales, organizations, and individuals with building capacity to solve problems and achieve objectives. TAT provides a mechanism that focuses on capacity building to encourage dissemination of knowledge and implementation of effective programs. Such programs help sustain tobacco control efforts” (Bullock & Moody-Thomas, 2011). As suggested by Sterling et al (2009), “To facilitate the
For individuals to be healthy requires the combination of varying levels of physical, mental and social well-being throughout a person's lifetime. Most people find that maintaining their health requires a certain amount of effort and intention. Health programs can help with this effort, but their effectiveness depends on how well health professionals make sure that an individual's attention and information convert to actions and behaviors that succeed (Issel, 2009).
“Strengthen community action”- The purpose of the health promotion program is to empower the local people to initiate on taking control over the social events which influence their lives and health (Rootman, 2001) Program design provides the sense of empowerment-based when the community members are involving in from planning to evaluation stage (Laverack & Labonte,
There are some challenges, as well, in implementing health promotion programs that use the social ecological framework. One main challenge is that programs are expensive and complex to implement in certain community settings. Also, there needs to be close coordination and collaboration between individuals and groups. In the article by Wagemakers et al., the authors developed a framework that links the domains of social environment and health, with key health predicting mediators, and operational variables of participation and collaboration (6). They based this framework on experience in case studies, audits of community health programs in the Netherlands, and ideas found in the literature. The authors offer four key guidelines on how to apply the framework that can help increase community participation and collaboration. These guidelines are: use the variables as a menu, set specific aims for social change processes, use an action research approach and triangulate data. This framework can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of community health promotion designs and address the challenges faced in implementing new programs.
Houston Methodist is a leading academic medical center in Texas. It is known for providing excellent care to the Greater Houston area. Their staff all follows the I Care values which are integrity, compassion, accountability, respect, and excellence. This company is consistently listed as one of the best hospitals in the United States. Their facilities also include an Emergency Care Center, Imaging Center, Breast care center, and also an outpatient center.
By observing these areas, it is noticeable that the design of the program is in line with five health promotion actions under the Ottawa Charter. The first two working areas intends to “develop personal skills” because it promote the local community members to increase their level of political analysis on their health problems and possible solutions (Laverack & Labonte, 2008a). The third area addresses to “strengthen community action” by empowering the community members to have ownership and control of their own endeavours and destinies (WHO, 2015). The fourth area is to “build healthy public policy” in joint action with the government and local community to achieve the health equity among groups (Laverack & Labonte, 2008a). The fifth area aims to “create supportive environments” by making healthy and easy choices in numerous settings in which people are spending much of their daily activities (Laverack & Labonte, 2008b). The last two areas are in line with the action to “reorient health services” because the program contributes resources for engaging the health workforce and better understanding on the roles of health system to improve population health (Laverack & Labonte, 2008b).
Smoking is one the top leading preventable causes of death in the world today.5 Among all the states in the United States, West Virginia is ranked the highest in regards to smoking among the adolescents.15 Smoking cigarettes is seen everywhere among adolescents and the adults, focusing on the current static readings of how severe it is common among the West Virginia adolescent age group. By developing and implementing tobacco-control programs it has been proven to reduce the rate of smoking cigarettes among adolescents in West Virginia.
WHO’s definition of a ‘setting’ in the context of Health Promotion is ‘the place or social context in which people engage in daily activities in which environmental, organisational and personal factors interact to affect health and wellbeing’ (WHO, 1998). The core concept of the approach is dictated in the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion, 1986. It involves initiating and maintaining a ‘supportive environment for health’ (WHO, 1986) and supports broader efforts of health promotion interventions, incorporating multiple determinants of health at a time. The SBA to HP values public participation, supportive social networks, empowerment, community, and health awareness. This approach aims to achieve positive health outcomes by embedding a health promoting concept into the organisational structure of a central setting such as a school, workplace or prison. It acknowledges a key connection between environment and wellbeing and works to achieve a more sustainable and long-term
In 2015, 9 of every 100 high school students (9.3%) reported in 2015 that they smoked cigarettes in the past 30 days this a decrease from 15.8% in 2011, this aggregate for entire US( CDC). In the Lower Bucks County area 1 in 5 (19.1%) adults currently smokes. This percentage is slightly lower than the smoking rate statewide (22.4%). The data supports the need to reduce smoking among all population, and starting with teens is a logical step.
Smoking is still a pressing issue for Americans, despite efforts to regulate and lessen tobacco use. One in every five Americans still regularly smokes a cigarette, and those who attempt to quit aren’t utilizing all the assistance resources available to them. With these treatments being more prominent now than ever before, there is evidence that supports the effects of a quitter using aid compared to one who does not. Providing brief interventions about tobacco cessation may encourage more quit attempts and use of appropriate treatments, such as a quit-lines or medication. Despite many efforts, healthcare providers are still failing to provide brief interventions to patients, which therefore exposes flaws in a healthcare-based strategy to drive
There are several components of an organization: having an accomplished and competent workforce, the latest system for storing and transmitting data, and the proficiency to evaluate and respond to the health needs of the public (Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 2015). Within these dynamics are the tools to enhance the health of communities by formulating environments that support & sustain optimum health, while promoting the learning of skillful behaviors. To break this down further, the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014) believe that with the above tools, every public health
The leading cause of death in the county is heart disease followed by cancer, and both of these can be linked to smoking or second-hand smoke exposure. Methods to move toward HP2020’s goal will involve encouraging and assisting smokers to quit. The Community Guide is a free resource to help guide communities to choose programs and policies for cessation. These programs are evidenced based, research-tested and include suggestions such as increasing the unit based price on tobacco products and how this would help to decrease use, increase the number of those who quit, decrease the number of those who try cigarettes the first time and decrease the tobacco related morbidity and mortality. The research suggest the improved health effects are proportional to the size of the price increase, also noted to be effective in prevention is mass reach communication or advertising regarding the dangers of smoking and also techniques for quitting (The Community guide, n.d.). Counseling is noted to be effective alone and with the use of medications and is available through programs like the toll-free quitline in South Carolina. Healthcare professional are urged to screen patients for use of tobacco and provide cessation information to all patients and also treatment strategies such as
In 2005, Needham, Massachusetts, has passed a regulation that banned the tobacco sale to anyone under 21. This regulation has achieved great success. The number of smoking students in high school has decreased by 47%. Smoking rate has decreased rapidly after 30 days and the 60% of frequent smoking
Since 1980, the United States has taken on 10-year plans that outline certain key national health objectives set to be accomplished during a 10-year timeframe (Shi & Singh, 2015). These initiatives are founded on medical care with prevention services, health promotion, education, community health care, and increased access to integrated services. The initiative, Healthy People 2010: Healthy People in Healthy Communities, launched in 2000. The initiative emphasizes the role of community partners such as
Prevention and wellness is a key focus in public health services. In Title Four of the PPACA, “prevention interventions are of two key types: services provided to individuals in clinical settings (e.g., cancer screenings), and programs and services provided to communities (e.g., ad campaigns about exercise)” (Redhead & Williams, 2010, p. 30). Many programs have formed in the hope of creating a comprehensive approach to prevention.
Several of our stated impact objectives could benefit by applying elements of the Health Belief Model, Social Cognitive Theory and Protection Motivation Theory. When developing our brochures specific emphasis could be made on the benefits of program participation and the consequences of inaction. Another consideration would be to emphasize that the program objectives are achievable and will benefit the good of their family and community. These conceptual elements of these theories can be found in the Theory of Planned Behavior, Health Belief Model, Social Cognitive Theory and Social Network Theory.