preview

Heredity and Sex Essay

Better Essays

Heredity and Sex

When analyzing the major accomplishments of the 20th century it is imperative to include the achievements in biology, which have revolutionized our understanding of life’s process and of disease. Already in the second half of the 19th century implications to future progress in the biological world were being made. Darwin had outlined the evolution in animal species, Mendel had discovered some basic rules for inheritance, and Weissman and other embryologists were beginning to decipher how an organism develops. (Britannica, 1) However there was one key element missing, how all these advances were correlated? The important information that unified these three fields (heredity, evolution, and development) came at the …show more content…

Internalist studies gained importance in the 1890’s to 1900 due to the success of German physiology and experimental embryologists. And the years of 1905-1915 brought a stress of heredity, where research was focused on chromosomes. (Masienschein, 458) Not one specific approach provided a full account of sex determination, however with the convergence of different approaches a new approach was manifested, which reshaped tradition of developmental study. (Maienschein, 458)

Thomas Hunt Morgan advocated the internalist developmental search for a theory of sex determination and production. In 1903 he concluded that both male and females “elements” exist in all kind of eggs and they are not predetermined as being either male or female. However his evidence remained inconclusive as to whether the nucleus or cytoplasm provided the determining influence on sex. (Maienschein, 467) Morgan acknowledge that there were two types of sex theories, the morphological (preexistence of sex in germ cells) and physiological (individual physiological process of development). Even in 1910 after receiving the Nobel Prize for research in sex-limited inheritance, Morgan remained declined to regard the chromosomes as responsible for determining development. He thought they played a role, but could not see them as determinants. (467) Eventually, the internalist set aside explicit concern about physiological

Get Access