Speeches have been an effective way for someone to share their thoughts and opinions about topics for years. Have they continued to be successful due to changes in the way that they are given, or is it because modern-day orators have continued to use some of the same speech techniques? To determine the answer, a comparison of an old political speech to a contemporary political speech would be required. In both speeches, Speech in the Virginia Convention and We are not Afraid, both Patrick Henry and Hillary Clinton use allusion, restatement, and parallelism to effectively state their views. In their speeches, both Patrick Henry and Hillary Clinton use allusion. Henry alludes to The Odyssey in the line, “We are apt to shut our eyes against a …show more content…
One example of Henry doing so is found when he is talking about the strength of his country. He says, “They tell us that we are weak. But when shall we be stronger” (Henry 102)? He is restating the point that the time for a revolution in America is now. He wants his audience to know how much hope, determination, and confidence he has in the future America because he believes that they are strong enough to win the revolution. Unlike Henry, Clinton does not use as much restatement in her speech. Nonetheless, an example can be found in her speech when she says, “I’m not here to repeal the 2nd Amendment. I’m not here to take away your guns” (Clinton). She is reiterating her belief of making strict regulations on gun control to ensure the safety of Americans. She wants it to be known that her motive is not to unarm Americans, which would infringe on the second constitutional amendment. Although both Henry and Clinton use restatement, Henry does a more effective job of emotionally moving his audience. He is putting faith into them, hoping that they will become motivated. On the contrary, Clinton is less effective in her form of restatement; she does not use restatement to motivate her audience like
In “Speech to the Virginia Convention” by Patrick Henry, he used allusions to contribute to the meaning of his purpose. Patrick Henry wrote this speech right before the American Revolution took place. His purpose was to persuade the Virginia Convention leaders that it was time to declare war against Great Britain. To prove his point that the time for rebellion had come, he used allusions, which are indirect references to historical people, events, or documents. One of the allusions Patrick Henry used was in lines 18-22 and referenced The Odyssey by Homer.
To begin, one rhetorical device Eleanor Roosevelt uses in her speech is the anaphora. For example, she states,“But we know that we have to work together and we have to progress” In this passage Eleanor repeats the phrase, “we have to” in order to emphasize the fact that not only should one
Modern historians often claim that Patrick Henry tended toward demagoguery and propaganda in his 1775 Speech to the Second Virginia Convention. I agree with these modern historians on the basis of Henry’s constant use of emotional appeals (pathos) and rhetorical devices such as parallel syntax, allusions, and irony to name a few. While he did have ethical (ethos) and logical (logos) appeals, the majority of Henry’s word choice and sentence structure showed that his speech was made up of emotional appeals that included both demagoguery and propaganda.
A technique that Henry used throughout his speech in order to get the crowd to be on his side of the argument is the use of repetition, hypophora, and rhetorical questions. A couple examples of when repetition was used is when Henry said, "The war is inevitable--and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come." (Henry) and "We must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight!" (Henry) Hypophora is the figure of speech in which a writer raises a question, and then immediately provides an answer to that question. An example of when hypophora was used is when Henry said, “Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with these warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land.” (Henry 228) Some asked rhetorical questions were "But when shall
On March 23rd, 1775, Patrick Henry delivered his Speech to the Virginia Convention. This speech becomes one of the most famous speeches in American Oratory. His audience were white men, that owned slaves and land, were wealthy, and men that received advanced education, compared to most men at that time. Considering all of these factors, Henry uses kinds of logic and emotion that appealed to them. In the Convention, Following a discussion about negotiating with the British, Henry presents a counter argument, saying that the colonists should fight against the British. Patrick Henry uses a variety of literary devices in his speech to defend his point, and convince the audience about his argument. The most significant literary device used by Henry
Elizabeth Cady Stanton’s speech at the Seneca Falls Convention in 1840 was aimed at men and women to try and bring equality to both sexes. Elizabeth’s speech was important because it got the ball rolling for equality and although we are not quite there yet today, we have come a long way since the time of this speech. Elizabeth persuaded many people with this speech and she achieved this by utilizing rhetoric pathos, ethos and logos, but more specifically she used Allusion, Metaphors and parallelism. These examples of rhetoric increase the persuasion of the speech and helped Elizabeth to acquire what she wanted.
President Ronald Reagan changed the way society viewed public speaking and politics and continues to make his impact on the world today as his rhetoric serves at the outlines of numerous governmental leaders such as President Trump (Costa). While his speeches occurred over thirty years ago over television and radio, Reagan is still remembered as being a monumental orator in history as his speeches are still highly critiqued in both academic settings and public history (Hayward)(Peters and Woolley). Throughout my paper, I will analyze the rhetorical devices Reagan used that were meant to unite, in order to help readers understand the rhetorical devices used in political rhetoric, which consequently both united and excluded certain people. Understanding past rhetoric of an orator such as Reagan will lead to a better understanding of the rhetorical devices used by political figures and the impacts they
Bush’s speech, the speeches are different. The differences in the two speeches are because of the difference in how Bush and Henry argued their ideas, how they used allusions, and how pathos was incorporated into the speeches to elicit certain emotions. Deductive arguing in Bush’s speech and inductive arguing in Henry’s speech was used to deliver the speeches in two different ways. In Henry’s speech, he uses several allusions to persuade his audience to believe that Great Britain was dangerous and would betray America. Lastly, Bush and Henry both utilize pathos in their speeches. Bush uses pathos in a repetitive way to remind his audience of the recent past attacks on America by the Iraqi regime. However, Henry exercises pathos to induce fear into his audience and elicits values of
Patrick Henry’s “Speech to the Virginia Convention” convinces Loyalists to wage war against Britain; he accomplishes this by using several rhetorical devices such as imagery, allusions, rhetorical questions, and diction. These devices are used to engage the listeners with descriptive images, get the listeners to think deeper, make connections to historical events, and use powerful words to emphasize certain claims.
First, Patrick Henry, author of “Speech in the Virginia Convention”, uses allusions and rhetorical questions to convince his
The point of any speech is to connect with an audience (and persuade them) on a far deeper level than any written form can provide. That connection may be through
Henry made the colonist feel the encouragement by using pathos. Several examples are in his speech, Speech to the Virginia Convention. He asked a rhetorical
In Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address and Henry’s speech in the Virginia Convention; both authors use the rhetorical devices ethos, logos, and pathos. Lincoln’s use of said devices provided a solid, clearly elaborated, and easy to listen to “Address” whilst Henry’s speech strengthened and structured clarification on all issues at hand, bringing the audience literally off of their seats providing for an exciting, powerful, yet bold speech. Patrick Henry’s use of ethos throughout his speech particularizes his views in the end by stating, “Give me liberty, or give me death!” and shows he wants to stand up for his country and its people. Lincoln’s use of ethos most effectively works in his address provides credibility among the highest authority,
In the speech, “Give me Liberty or Give me Death!”, by Patrick Henry and in the excerpt, “Common Sense”, by Thomas Paine, rhetoric is used thoroughly. During the era of these excerpts, war was a significant matter, so Henry and Paine made these excerpts to enlighten and “boost-up” the people and make them ready for war. Both of the excerpts had the qualities to do so, but “Common Sense” uses more rhetorical devices and is more persuasive due to the language he uses, his ability to relate to the people, and showing the faults in other countries to help us realize that we are a strong country and we need to be ready to fight for it.
Persuasion, “The act of causing people to do or believe something: the act or activity of persuading people”. While looking at each speech, both Edwards and Henry used three powerful literary devices in presenting their speeches: Persuasion, Reason, and Emotion. In Edwards’s message “Sinners in the hand of an angry God” his main tactic was the use of persuasion and emotion. For example, on P.39 Edwards says, “The God that holds you over the pit of hell, much as one holds a spider, or some loathsome insect over the fire, abhors you, and is dreadfully provoked”.