preview

Hillary Clinton Vs Odyssey

Decent Essays

Speeches have been an effective way for someone to share their thoughts and opinions about topics for years. Have they continued to be successful due to changes in the way that they are given, or is it because modern-day orators have continued to use some of the same speech techniques? To determine the answer, a comparison of an old political speech to a contemporary political speech would be required. In both speeches, Speech in the Virginia Convention and We are not Afraid, both Patrick Henry and Hillary Clinton use allusion, restatement, and parallelism to effectively state their views. In their speeches, both Patrick Henry and Hillary Clinton use allusion. Henry alludes to The Odyssey in the line, “We are apt to shut our eyes against a …show more content…

One example of Henry doing so is found when he is talking about the strength of his country. He says, “They tell us that we are weak. But when shall we be stronger” (Henry 102)? He is restating the point that the time for a revolution in America is now. He wants his audience to know how much hope, determination, and confidence he has in the future America because he believes that they are strong enough to win the revolution. Unlike Henry, Clinton does not use as much restatement in her speech. Nonetheless, an example can be found in her speech when she says, “I’m not here to repeal the 2nd Amendment. I’m not here to take away your guns” (Clinton). She is reiterating her belief of making strict regulations on gun control to ensure the safety of Americans. She wants it to be known that her motive is not to unarm Americans, which would infringe on the second constitutional amendment. Although both Henry and Clinton use restatement, Henry does a more effective job of emotionally moving his audience. He is putting faith into them, hoping that they will become motivated. On the contrary, Clinton is less effective in her form of restatement; she does not use restatement to motivate her audience like

Get Access