preview

Essay about Hiroshima

Better Essays

The history of destruction dates back as far as mankind has existed. The constant wars, battles, and death have left an imprint that will forever be engrained into our past. When disastrous events occur, our world begins to change in some way. We often read about the great destruction of World War I, but it’s very difficult to know the true feelings and opinions of what was happening during that time. This is one small example in the history of destruction. World War II followed suit when it turned out to be a prime example of human nature reaching the greatest heights of destruction. World War II was ending and the Japanese unexpectingly attacked the U.S. at Pearl Harbor. The U.S. would in turn bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki. After the …show more content…

Whether the use of this particular weapon to be used was justified or not, the world will never know, but for me it was the proper attack. Dr. Leo Szilard, 62, is a Hungarian-born physicist who helped persuade President Roosevelt to launch the A-bomb project and who had a major share in it. In later years, Truman was elected President and he had to make the decision on whether or not to launch the bombs on Japan. Dr .Leo was totally against the use of the bombs on the Japanese and thought that the President was making a wrong choice. When reporters asked Dr. Leo if President Truman really though the whole process through, he states, I don't think Japan would have surrendered unconditionally without the use of force. He is saying that there was a need to use force in order for the Japanese to surrender. There is some evidence saying that Japanese were waiting for any chance to surrender to the U.S but there is no actual proof. Dr. Leo is a physicist not a world leader, he does not know all the things that a President of the U.S. would know. A decision of that kind could not be chosen by a scientist, they are only involved in making a product. They know what the product does inside and out but on a worldly issue they are pretty blinded to the real facts. The opinions of our scientific colleagues on the initial use of these weapons are not unanimous: they range from a purely technical demonstration to that of the military application

Get Access