The title of Part II is “His Preposterous Heritage,” a strange appellation, as none of Smith’s biological heritage is discussed in the novel. The title instead metaphorically relates to the adoptive family Smith finds among Jill, Jubal Harshaw, and his servants. With his innocence and naïveté, Smith’s perception of the world is completely structured from his environment under the guidance of Jubal and his coterie. Jubal immediately begins to treat Smith with a fatherly fondness, and everybody in the household begins affectionately referring to him as “Mike.” This leads Mike to form a deep connection with his new acquaintances, as they all eventually become his “water brothers”. Meanwhile, Heinlein begins to develop Jubal Harshaw into a more central character. Jubal’s arguments with Jill and Duke, one of his employees, serve as a platform for him to elucidate his libertarian convictions. Jubal challenges the standard way of thinking, as his speeches tend to concern the responsibility of the individual to make his or her own decisions and determine his or her own …show more content…
Mike’s interpretation of religion lies in the word “grok,” as it is centrally significant to the way Mike sees the world. Although the meaning of the word can never be translated into English, it is clear that “grokking” is something more than knowing—one who “groks” is connected to all other who “grok” and everybody and everything that is “grokked.” Within this, Mike finds a connection to the human God—just as God is a force that flows through everything in the universe, so is “grokking.” Just as all people “grok,” Mike believes that all people are God. He references Jubal, exclaiming, “Thou art God. That which groks. Anne is God. I am God. The happy grass are God” (Heinlein 184). This belief forms the basis of the message that he promotes throughout the rest of the
Second, he presents himself as somebody who understands that some or majority of the readers might not agree with his viewpoint. He presents both sides of the story by acknowledging the fact that prisons have managed to transform some prisoners even if they have not achieved much. Third, he refers to Warden John’s viewpoint that if many older prisoners were to be released, then they would not harm our societies (Rideau Para. 5). In so doing, he claims that if prisons were to remain, then they should target the young
Fowler saw faith as greater than religious faith and viewed it as a “universal aspect of human existence” (Hutchison, 2015). The ultimate environment is an important element of Fowler’s theory. He saw faith as not only an internal image but also how one relates to that image. Faith is not an unchangeable image or idea, but a way of being. The six stages of
Through the Baobabs in The Little Prince, we can also better understand the idea of gangrene v. amputation in James Baldwin’s “Notes of a Native Son.” In this piece, Baldwin focuses on his father and how his hate for racism and white people causes him to be mean, distant, and paranoid, eventually resulting in his death. The idea of gangrene v. amputation is introduced by Baldwin as the ways in which one can handle interracial relationships between blacks and whites. According to Baldwin, “Amputation is swift but time may prove that the amputation was not necessary. . . . Gangrene is slow, but it impossible to be sure that one is reading one’s symptoms right” (Baldwin 113). Thus, one can either continue to have these interracial relations
Juxtapose is finding similarities and differences between two perspectives. Juxtapose is shown throughout this whole book as Dick and Perry are compared on their opinions and details of what’s going on. An example would be describing the dog, Dick was very short sentenced about it and acted as if it was an everyday lifestyle. Whereas Perry, described the situation in detail and told about the dog and what exactly happened. This is juxtapose because it is comparing Dick and Perry’s feelings towards the same subject. Moods and the tone switch constantly when conversating or describing a topic. Dick gets annoyed easily and uses profanity to describe himself, others and the environment around him. Perry however says derogatory comments often towards others and even Dick.
The events in life are ways of growth and development in a person’s life, family or a society. Over time, humans will know the mental, physical and spiritual changes as a result of experiences. These changes can make some broad similarities in life or make a difference to develop independence and make a lifestyle. In these essays: "Notes of a Native Son" by James Baldwin and "Three Spheres" by Lauren Slater are essays that give examples of events that are similar and different in characteristics that can occur in a person’s life in the growth stage.
This poem is titled “Heritage” and is by Countee Cullen (for Harold Jackman). The social issue that motivated Cullen to write Heritage is the oppression that blacks faced and their eagerness to go back to the place that their ancestors were taken from. In the poem Cullen reflects the urge to reclaim the African arts, during this time, the Harlem Renaissance, blacks called this movement negritude. Cullen depicts the negro speaking on the view of Africa, by the all negroes. In the poem, Cullen uses auditory imagery, organic imagery, and visual imagery.
In the process of making decisions, they discover things about themselves they never knew before. Hiram made many important decisions in this book that revealed characteristics about him that were unknown in the beginning of the book. His decision to testify against the opposing side showed that Hiram wasn’t racist like his grandfather, but someone who believed justice should be for those who deserved it. After reflecting upon matters, Hiram declared that “I was gonna do what was right” ( Crowe 154), which gives an idea of his identity. Almost always, the decisions show who people are and help identify themselves. Morally wrong decisions cast a negative light, whereas good decisions cast us in a positive one. Moreover, Hiram states that “the trial of his killers might be the start of things, might be a small step to making a life for Negroes in the South ..better”(Crowe 154). With this statement, Hiram can be identified as an egalitarian and unbiased person. What point is trying to be crossed is that people make decisions in life that help them mold into they person are
Karen Armstrong's first chapter in "The Case of God", "Homo Religiosus", provides readers with the opportunity to gain a better understanding of the idea of religion as being a dominant concept in human nature. Armstrong apparently wants to emphasize that humans were designed so as for them to be religious and thus concentrate on taking on a series of attitudes meant to provide them with the chance to develop religious ideologies. It is practically as if the need to connect with a higher force is in people's DNA, taking into account that most communities throughout history have concentrated on reaching a higher state of mind by trying to develop a relationship with the divine.
Our individualized culture and history depends on us to better understand where we come from. It is necessary for each generation to preserve and continue our customs and beliefs.
point of view you can't accept either of them as the whole truth. Because of
Stephen Ambrose’s “To America: Personal Reflections of a Historian” is a work of the author’s thoughts and reevaluation of his feelings and lectures toward American history. In the first chapter called “The Founding Fathers”, Stephen Ambrose discusses his viewpoints towards the founding fathers, Jefferson and Washington. The chapter shows his full acknowledgement of Jefferson’s and Washington’s dark past of their positions as slaveholders as well as highlighting some of their prejudices. However despite these unfortunate circumstances, he stresses the importance and value of these two historical individuals. He reminds the readers of their struggles, their hopes and dreams that had inspired future generations after them. He further commentates
Linda Hogan was mixed of blood: European (white people) and Native American Indians. Indians believe that their home is not one particular house with a specific address, home is their land. They lived as nomads who move from place to place escaping from their enemies. That's why Linda said, " From my family I have learned the secret / of never having a home." She felt that her home is a land, and a land is her home, it is a part of her and she is a pare of it.
Had I not been present for our lecture on Thursday, I imagine I would claim to be more drawn to Herskovits’s mode of approach. While The Myth of the Negro Past was frustrating, and even bordering on ludicrous at times, I typically feel more drawn to studies geared towards things that are tangible, at the least. Pain and loss are amorphous—they are nearly impossible to grasp on to. Hartman’s plight is respectable, but also difficult as all hell. By embracing the approach that she does, Hartman puts herself in a vulnerable position. No amount of qualifiers can reflect the gargantuan amount of pain and suffering which grappling with loss can elicit. It is for that reason that I would have originally turned to Herskovits, but, like I said, our
Oppression and Racism what are they? The dictionary defines oppression as “A prolonged cruel or unjust treatment or exercise of authority”, and Racism as “A belief that a particular race or group of people is superior or inferior to another”. Both of these exist in many societies and take on many forms and have no respect of your gender, your race or your financial status. In the early 1900’s in many parts of the United States these forces affected the decisions of many and controlled many of the actions of the people in that era. These people were ignorant to the fact that all men were equal in the eyes of God. Richard Wright in his novel, “Native Son” introduces Bigger Thomas and details his life as a black man living in what he calls
It’s crazy to think that the way you were raised is what has made you become the person you are today. Everyone has their own story about how they were raised, where they were raised, and who they were raised with. Each person has their own type of heritage with how they are raised based upon their family, where they were raised, religion, family traditions, values, and beliefs. The way you were raised in life has influenced your personality. The way you act and the way you are viewed as are both influenced by your family’s heritage.