preview

Horne V. Flores Case Summary

Decent Essays

When it comes to legal obligations for students that are English language learners, every student violated supposed to have equal access to their education. It was mentioned that in the year of 1970 the federal Office for Civil Rights, distributed a letter to all school’s districts mentioning that all school districts must offer services to students who are English language learners (Office for Civil Rights ,2006). After the ruling of Lau v. Nichols was pass, the congress passed an act called Equal Educational Opportunity Act (EEOA). The act is based upon that all children must have equivalent educational opportunities. This is important for the reason that each student should be treated equal and it does not matter if they are familiar with the English language. Every student should have the right to a proper education and nobody should be discriminated upon. …show more content…

This case was called the Horne vs Flores in which it was held in the federal courts. During this case it was argued that the state of Arizona had fail to provide sufficiently funding to the English Language Leaner Programs in the Nogales Unified School District (Horne v. Flores). From this case many parents and students argue that the English Language Learners were not receiving their proper education. Horne vs Flores case argued that the lack of funding programs for the English Language Learners dishonored Equal Educational Opportunity Act (Horne v. Flores). The ruling of this case in 2009 it was ruled that the State of Arizona should not be assessed upon the limited spending for the English Language Learners however, they should take into consideration the outcomes of these programs that they offer for the students (Horne v.

Get Access