preview

How Did Stephen King Build Suspense

Decent Essays

Most readers identify Stephen King’s works as horror, however, he sees them as suspense novels (“Stephen King interview on Charlie Rose (1993)”). Stephen King is affiliated with the horror genre because of his excessive use of gore in his novels. However, gore is merely a side agenda that helps King shape his ideas. Instead, King’s main goal is to create suspense. By creating a vivid image of the impact of a murder, rape, or other catastrophe he can further his goal by unnerving his reader and creating a conflict. Stephen King’s extensive and creative use of the pitting of good vs evil, foreshadowing, imagery, and supernatural occurrences makes a more suspenseful novel.
Arguably the most suspenseful conflict in Stephen King’s literature is …show more content…

First, King must use stereotypes to create a character that represents good and one that represents evil. For instance, in Under the Dome the primary villain is Big Jim. Big Jim is a corrupt politician, used car salesmen, and a drug dealer, all of which give his character a negative connotation. On the other hand, Barbara represents rectitude. Barbara is an ex-serviceman that tries to restore order and assist the public. Oftentimes, Stephen King gives outsiders, like Barbara, a positive association (Sharon 21). Next, Stephen King applies the characters to the plot. In the novel Under the Dome, Stephen King’s plot is to isolate a small town under an invisible dome. Accordingly, the protagonist and antagonist have disparate motives. On one side, Big Jim wants to hold everyone hostage in the dome to hold his leverage in the town. On the other side, Barbara works closely with government authorities to free the citizens of Chester’s Mill from under the dome. Lastly, he shapes the conflict with a suspenseful mood. With these contrasting motives, Big Jim attempts to dispose of Barbara and “Friends of Barbara” by framing them with fabricated evidence. Consequently, the reader is left in constant concern for the lives of Barbara and his …show more content…

In difference, Peter is the rightful heir to the thrown that wants to help the poor. Then, it integrates them into the plot. Stephen shapes a fantasy kingdom home to a corrupt magician that never wants anything courteous to happen. Early in the story, King reveals that Flagg’s goal is to put Thomas in power so he could have absolute control in the kingdom. Peter’s motive is to rid the kingdom of Flagg’s corruption and restore peace. Lastly, he creates the conflict with suspense. In the beginning of the story Flagg frames Peter for the poisoning of King Roland. Due to Flagg’s wickedness, Peter is sentenced to life imprisonment. As a result, Flagg now has complete control over the kingdom and the poor suffer. Stephen King leaves the reader in concern for the kingdom’s people and for Peter. Even though the other two novels were great examples of Stephen King’s conflict oriented suspense, The Stand is by far his best example of a good vs evil suspense novel. The Stand takes two characters that are defined as good and evil and they each serve as role models for their own society. Mother Abigail is good and Randall Flagg is malicious. Randall Flagg is a corrupt leader that directs his group to participate in sinful activities. Mother

Get Access