How Did The Natural Environment Affect Eurasia

The Mongols were a small tribe from the grasslands of Central Asia. They conquered a lot of the known world. It has been debated whether the Mongol’s are barbaric or not, or how barbaric they really are. The Mongol’s are barbaric because they conquered more land than any other conquerors, had brutal army strategies, and immoral laws. The Mongols conquered more land than any other conquerors.

How Barbaric were the “Barbarians”? Eight hundred years ago, during the 13th century, a small tribe named the mongols began to conquer. They were called barbarians by most of the world which is a negative term which meant evil and savage. The mongols had their “brutal” side but also was know for some good things but once side by side you can easily say that they were barbaric. The mongols were the most barbaric civilization due to what they did to their very own people, also how they dealt with their enemies and how crucial their laws were.

Some people would say the Mongols were a key development to civilization. However, the progress they made is nothing compared to their cruelty and the process they used to conquer the majority of Asia and parts of the Middle East. The Mongols were originally a small, nomadic tribe that originated from the steppes of Central Asia. The tribe placed little value on objects, considering they moved around in yurts and hardly settled. Led by Genghis Khan, they conquered land worth double the size of the Roman Empire. The Mongols were greedy, bloodthirsty barbarians who had little to no regard for human life. They went to unthinkable lengths to conquer land while destroying countless ancient cities.

Positively, the Mongols were great conquerors and they respected each other, negatively, they brutally harmed people and valuables in the process. Charles J. Halperin wonderfully stated, “The Mongol Empire made significant contributions to the political institutions, economic development, and cultural diversity of many lands. No history of the Mongol Empire dwells only on Mongol destruction, can be satisfactory” (Doc 6). The history of the Mongols can’t only be about the negativity that they caused to society as the Mongols had a more positive impact rather than a negative impact. The Mongols created a vast empire throughout Eurasia, but it wasn’t worth killing over 5 million people in the process. In the end, as a result of the vast empire, they weren’t able to control it. Eventually, the Mongol empire and became a part of the society in the area and vanished

According to Carpini and William of Rubrick, they both have positive things to say about the Mongols. I say this because document 1 states that the Mongols pay their lords more respect than any other people, and would hardly dare lie to them (Doc #1). I think this document is mainly positive because of the fact that the writer states that the Mongols are people that show good respect to their gods and lord. On the other hand they are extremely arrogant toward other people and feel that anybody that is

The nomads had to travel to more fertile grounds in search of food. The structure of coastal cultures made changes in their social and political structure to accommodate the increased population. Likewise, the nomads of the Eurasia interior conquered and settled in agricultural zones where they brought innovations to the society. Areas that had an increase of immigrants include Mesopotamia, the Indus River Valley, Anatolia, Iran, China, and Europe (Tignor et al, 2008).

Did you know that Mongols are known for their wars and battle tactics? Overall, the Mongols show more cultural destruction. There are 3 reasons why the Mongols are a cultural destruction. One reason is the army and the wars that they have been through. Also all the suffering that they did as a team.

The Mongols impacted civilizations all over the world. In the end though the Mongols blended into most civilizations they conquered,

There have been many civilizations that have existed throughout the history of the world. In early history, many of these civilizations were nomadic tribes and clans. Although these groups of people tended to be small, they often had a great impact on the civilized world around them. The Turkic nomads from Central Asia are no different; their impact on Eurasia and its culture had lasting impressions.

They were affected by the culture and religion and the ways of living. The reason that they are so affected is because in people move in and out of there countries.

In order to gain this extensive amount of territory the Mongols fought a lot of tough, brutal wars, and for centuries they have been remembered for their brutality but that is not how they should be remembered. The Mongols should be remembered as a society that valued peace and stability because their traditional lifestyle was very peaceful and they influenced a period of great peace, known as Pax Mongolia.

This meant that pastoral nomads and transhumant herders adjusted more quickly started warfare and movement of war chariots into East Asia. Many nomadic people began to search for pastures for livestock or even just water to drink. This then continued to more densely populated river valleys and start competition between the already established farming communities for the lands resources and space. This started the expansion of territorial states that started the centralization of Afro-Eurasia at this time so that nomadic people and settled people could be at terms. Even though states were into place in certain areas there was still trade routes that you needed to look out for. There was rule that was set into place but invaders or nomadic people didn’t always follow them. Merchants also needed the favor of local rulers for their protection. These invaders would be successful in Southwest Asia attacking Egypt and taking over their kingdom and later on setting a stronger foundation. In total, the times of nomadic and normal settled people in Afro-Eurasia started many problems that continued with warfare and hardships. These times ultimately started the emergence of future micro-societies for our world that was based on the expansion of populations and the increasing

When you first hear the word Mongol, the immediate image that comes to mind is that of a fearsome and ruthless warrior. This reputation helped the Mongols conquer and rule the largest empire in history which spanned from China to Europe. While the rise of the Mongols is largely attributed to the emergence of their famed leader, Genghis Khan, the Mongol Empire itself would have lasting effects on China, Korea, and Japan even after his death. The Mongols would occupy Koryo Korea, defeat the Southern Song Dynasty to occupy China, and attempt to invade and conquer Japan on two occasions under the guidance of Kublai Khan. These aggressive maneuvers by the Mongol Empire would have significant ramifications on the development of China, Korea, and

The barbarians, Vikings, and the Mongolians are portrayed throughout history as bloodthirsty savages that only care about killing people and pillaging villages and towns. The barbarians, Vikings, and the Mongols often don’t receive credit for the ways that they positively impacted ancient civilizations. Even though the barbarians, Vikings, and the Mongolians impacted ancient civilizations in positive ways they also did some things that impacted ancient civilizations in negative ways.

With improvements in communication the population that was distributed along the trade routes became concentrated on the centres. This population was highly affected by the economic competition of that time. The populations that moved into cities faced hardships which tested their patience, persistence, and adaptability. The Ottomans had to keep the system running under these social pressures.