Hobbes Hobbes is a difficult philosopher to just pinpoint and label in my understanding. He said that he accomplished the impossible when talking about math. His contribution to philosophy was that he took apart Descartes dualist approach by saying that the mind does not exist. To Hobbes what exists are the things that make up reality, that move. He is said to be a pessimist due to his psychology to altruism. The most well know Hobbes contribution was in psychology. Hobbes believed that “all human acts are motivated by self-interest and the quest to power.” (page 190) He believed that every deed we do is done only if we get to benefit from it. Hobbes held a very pessimistic view on people due to this. Personally, I don’t agree with him completely. Hobbes’ psychological egoism takes a negative outlook on humanity, and sort of reverts back to primal days where we would fight for survival. I think humanity has moved far from that at this point. …show more content…
He used the egoist theory and also contrasted the state with nature. He instilled that fear of anarchy in the people of the state in order to legitimize it. Anarchy he described it as animal like and selfish and that people had “the right to protect oneself using any means at one’s disposal using violence and slaughter.” (page 192) This is a scare tactic and I’m sure people fell for it easily because it seems reasonable. Hobbes “social contract” was also his way of fixing this issue of anarchy. What this social contract is the agreement between two opposing people that cannot help but not trust one another. This lack of trust leads to discomfort for both parties, so in order to make everything normal and comfortable again both sides must give absolute power to a third person to put their worries to rest. Thus, Hobbes concluded that even if the third power does become corrupt due to their egoism it “was better than the alternative- the horrors of anarchy.” (page
Thomas Hobbes was born in 1588 in England. Hobbes survived through the English Revolutionary era, and his perspective of human nature built up negatively. He believed that all men were innately bad and evil. Hobbes stated, “... yet they will hardly believe there be many so wise as themselves” (Hobbes 1). This quote shows his thought, that all men are selfish and they always think they are better than anyone. Hobbes believed that humans didn't know how to cooperate because same desire would only cause them to be an enemy. Also, Hobbes said that it was the human who limits the development due to their constant war with each other.
As for the sovereignty philosophy that Hobbes came up with was that power should reside in the state or ruler. The sovereign representative or the ruler was to provide safety for the people and to conduct this in a manner that does not harm the people or their well-being. Ultimately Hobbes supported government and stability in government for the well-being of the citizens. In conclusion, Hobbes and Locke both stated that cooperation between government and its citizens was necessary.
Hobbes believed that people each have their own ideas of right and wrong, and that there is no way to tell if a person’s version of right and wrong is universally right or wrong. Practically, that each person will create their own rationalization and will even kill another person for physical safety or securing
Thomas Hobbes believed that man by nature is evil. He however, lived in a time of war
Another philosopher by the name of John Locke lived in approximately the same time period as Hobbes. All the facts of their time period, are what sparked many of their ideas towards society.
Hobbes chose to examine the political society and broke it down to its basic parts of individual men. He understood the nature of man and thus was able to further examine the forces that drive humanity and came to understand the real role of politics in our lives rather than the role predetermined by the elite, who dictate what is good for man. Hobbes sought to answer an overall question what can be said about the overall nature of man?
Why is this information important? By defining the intent of man, Hobbes is setting up the need for absolute sovereignty to create a conducive community where man can live with others. If he can establish that man is inherently seeking only for himself, he can create the need for a ruling authority. Hobbes will have to establish a need for man to have to deal with others to live. He will have to come up with a way for man to need to enter an agreement, and the rules of such agreements.
He claims that acts of kindness, charity and benevolence are always actions that the performer believes will result in a beneficial consequence for himself. Hobbes’ basis for this argument lies in the concept of
Hobbes believed that people should not possess any rights, because if we did, chaos would be created. Chaos would come afloat because humans are greedy, selfish and self-interested, making us unable to think of anyone else but ourselves. Our responsibilities would be to simply follow the “ king’s” rules, or in a society like ours, simply follow the laws. Ultimately in Hobbes's ideal society people would have no freedom and one responsibility, with the exception of the king who is in charge of keeping order; thus making his/her rights and responsibilities flexible. He thought this was because, during the English revolution, the chaos was created because people opposed the leader, and instead disagreed with him and his ruling
Thomas Hobbes had a very interesting outlook on life, something that was so prevalent for centuries, a monarchy. He believed that the ideal world should fall under a monarch, an idea that is outdated in almost every nation across the globe. He was so strong on these ideas, because he believed all humans at their core are selfish creatures. Another thought that he had was that the state should have total control and order over the people, to maintain peace and to destroy the selfishness that exists in
He wrote a book called The Leviathan; where he states his views on human nature and his implications for a proper government. Hobbes believes that all people are equal, but equality brings about competition. His view on human nature is that people are “naturally evil and selfish in the state of nature” (Hobbes). In order to maintain order amongst the evil people, a social contract should be signed with the Leviathan. When people sign the social contract, they give up all their rights to the Leviathan in return for law and order; this ensures protection and peace for the citizens.
Hobbes also thought that an authoritarian government would come to power in order to enforce the social contract by whatever means necessary. He called this Leviathan. Individuals exchanged their rights in return for peace, security, and protection from one another.
Hobbes believes that by being rational beings, and reasoning out things, we can all live a little more peacefully.
Hobbes believed that in nature people had to do whatever was necessary to survive and that even if living together, people were still likely to fight. His view of people was dark and most likely due to the horrors of a series of political schemes and armed conflicts he had seen during the English Civil War. He believed that a contract was necessary. Hobbes felt that people were not capable of living in a democratic society. Instead, a single dominant ruler was needed, and if everyone did their part, then the community would function smoothly. Hobbes’ theory is unlike Locke and Rousseau’s. He believed that once the people gave power to the government, the people gave up the right to that power. It would essentially be the cost of the safety the people were seeking.
Thomas Hobbes born in 1588, was an English political theorist who believed in Monarchy. Hobbes felt that humans, by nature were inherently selfish beings. During the English Civil war, he expressed the need for an absolute ruler. Like how a man has control over his household. To Hobbes, “without an absolute ruler people would kill each other” (Lawrence Smith Lecture). Due to humans being inherently selfish, they would risk the commonwealth of the community for themselves. This would likely cause complications in society and the social disorder. Hobbes conveyed that, “laws make people behave as civilized people” and without them, people