preview

• How Does The Constitution Affect Governance Today?

Better Essays

The Constitution has protected the positive liberties of citizens in the United States of America. However, it is vital to ask the question: How does the Constitution affect governance today? Considering it was written over 225 years ago, by the Founding Fathers who had no perspective on what problems the United States would be facing and what affective governance would be needed for those specificities. It was designed for a nation that was composed of 4 million people and out of that number, 700,000 were slaves. In fact, those who were free, 95% were farmers. Currently the United States has approximately 319 million people Positive aspects included in the Constitution can take form in a plethora of ways, ranging from extensive social …show more content…

According to USConstitution.net, the separation of powers provides a system of power shared among the three branches, known as checks and balances found in Article I, Article II, and Article III. This system was incorporated in the Constitution and considered a legacy of the founders’ for the mistrust of factions. Madison stated in Federalist 51. That each compartments would be focused on its own objectives, and also prevent from intervening in other affairs. However, there can truly be no power in check, unless the people who are distributed with that power are the primary source. A concern of the Anti- Federalists was that a large republic was only achievable under force. In the Virginia ratifying convention, Patrick Henry’s speech was clear on his concern that a standing army would have to be used to enforce the laws. Meaning that the United States rarely has anything that can truly be recounted as a “government.” For instance, when one party has extortionate power and control over the four components of government. The House of Representatives, the Senate, the White House, and the Supreme Court is where the mechanism gridlock threatens. In which, causes the inability of the government to act because rival parties control different parts of the government. The fact that checks and balances was applied on government, it leads to situations such as, the President being allowed to veto legislation from

Get Access