How Many Emperors Came To Power

The Roman Empire was one of the largest empires the world has ever seen. The power and size they managed to obtain has been a constant subject of interest for historians and all those who are interested in history. Julius Caesar’s ascension to power marked the time from where the Romans steadily expanded their territory and by the time the Roman Republic dissolved and the Roman Empire emerged, the Empire had become so big that the Romans had then to face the problem of maintaining their empire. The Roman Empire maintained its power by

The Roman empire owed its existence to Julius Caesar’s military genius and leadership. At the time of his birth, the Roman republic was rife with corruption, losing touch with the people as Rome rapidly expanded. In addition, the republic suffered much unrest due to an excess of slave labor, leaving many unemployed for the government to sustain with basic food and entertainment, or “bread and circuses.” Caesar changed this, joining partnership with two other prominent men, the wealthy Crassus and the general Pompey, to form the First Triumvirate. However, he quickly took the reins of the new government, securing his position as dictator with many populist actions, such as distributing land to poor farmers. They, in turn, showed loyalty toward their leader, providing unity and patriotism. The Roman empire was born into the perfect geographical and cultural circumstances to rise to greatness.

The Roman Empire was one of the most impregnable empires at it’s time. It conquered the Mediterranean Sea and was a well organized and blooming empire, at first. Many problems began to hit Rome straight in the face, three of the main problems that ended this magnificent empire were the economic problems, the weakness and vulnerability of their army, and the fallibility of the leaders and politics.

The Roman Empire began when Julius Caesar became one of the leaders to reign and conquer Rome. Rome was commonly referred to as “the eternal city.” Rome had a total of 19 emperors from 235 to 285 CE. Those 19 emperors might have caused the fall of Rome to happen. The decline of Rome, or the “fall” of Rome, was due to economic problems, Roman emperors, and natural disasters and disease.

Imperial Rome was an era that had drastic political benefits and deficits. There were a variety of different dynasties that ruled during this period. All of the dynasties ruled after the assassination of Julius Caesar. He was thought to be a conspirator of corruption, but his death was to promote corruption. Among the leaders of Rome, corruption was widespread.

During the early years of the Roman Republic, the treatment of slaves and citizens from conquered countries, the delicately balanced government and the role of the Consuls, and the corruption of the Republic helped lay the foundation for Roman Imperialism by allowing the government and people to adjust easily to an emperor. Imperial Rome begins when Octavian, Caesar’s great-nephew, rises to power and takes the name Augustus. He becomes the first emperor to rule the Roman Empire. Previously, Rome was a republic with the majority of the power divided between three divisions of the government. The expectations of slaves in the Republic laid the foundation for the expectations of citizens in Imperial Rome.

According to many historians Augustus was not only the first emperor of Rome but also the greatest. During his long and impressive career Augustus dissolved the faulty governmental system of the Republic and created a new basis of Roman government that stood for three centuries. On his death bed Augustus was purported to have said: “Did I play my part well?” Through examination of his reforms of the Roman tax and legal system, as well as his role in creating the Pax Romana and a stable military it is evident that Augustus’s reing and reformes was a good thing.

The transition from a decentralized government to a centralized government was quite messy for the Romans, mainly due to the brutal assassination of Julius Caesar by his own senators, following this came the rule of Mark Antony, though he was soon defeated by Octavian. Unlike Caesar, Octavian did not declare himself the ruler, instead he siphoned power away from the senate, and towards himself, along with replacing senators who were against him with one for him, through Octavian’s Rule, Rome Flourished as a empire conquering and expanding its reaches, as well as dividing itself into two parts to further enhance rule. Octavian’s rule showed that Rome, was able to be ruled without many

Julius Caesar's reign was an unfavorable and chaotic period for Rome, and after his death, a large portion of the empire was handed down to his adopted son, Gaius Octavian. From the ashes of his father, Octavian was able to build an Empire unparalleled. Later, the name Augustus was given to him by Senate. Augustus ostensibly maintained the form of the Roman Republic while in actuality creating the Roman Empire. He introduced the administrative reforms that led to the Pax Romana with its flourishing of trade and the arts. Although Augustus's ascension to power could have not been without it bequested by Julius, it was his use of art and propaganda that reinforced the legitimacy his position.

1.) Augustus Caesar was the first true emperor of Rome in 31 BCE. His rise to the throne marked the true beginning of the Roman Empire. The vast majority believe Julius Caesar to be an emperor of Rome even before Augustus. However, Julius Caesar chose to use the title of ‘Dictator’ rather than ‘Emperor’. Augustus’ rule was prosperous and well-favored because he had destroyed Rome’s enemies and brought much needed stability to the Roman Empire. Augustus reigned until his death in 14 CE. Rome became a better protected and more influential power under Augustus’ rule. Rome is considered to be one of the greatest, if not the greatest, political and cultural powers in history.

Rome had seen many leaders step up to the plate in order to rule over Rome with absolute power. There were many who only wanted to exercise their power over the people, those who only wanted the army’s strength, and those who only wanted to advance the senate and laws than help the people or watch the army. However, there were a few emperors who were able to rise above these issues and bring about a seemingly peaceful time in Rome. I have chosen the three, in my opinion, best emperors of Rome, who were able to take command of Rome and make a huge impact. The three emperors that I chose were Sulla, Julius Caesar, and last but not least Augustus.

The fall of the Roman Empire was one of the most pivotal points in history. The two main factors of the decline were internal and external, the internal being social, political, and economic, and the external being invaders and barbarians. Economically, Rome’s empire was dependent on foreign expansion for money, and when they stopped expanding there were shortages in money and no more expanding. Politically there was basically permanent weakness in the government system that was left behind by Augustus and poor leadership by poor emperors.

The First Roman Emperor, Augustus Caesar achieved Rome great glory. From his birth, he had three names Octavius, Octavian, and the Roman Senate consulted him the name Augustus. He had the power to rule Rome’s religious, political and military affairs, with the Senate as an advisory body, successfully making him Emperor. Augustus’s transformation for Rome was tuff but he was able to achieve ultimate power. He really didn’t like being called “emperor”. He never titled himself as that. Augustus was one of the greatest leaders of history.

Political abuse of power affected the Roman Empire in the worst possible way because it impacted the society negatively. The emperors of Rome, oppressed their citizens, by taking away their freedom. Since the emperors of Rome were weak, they could not control or handle the citizens of Rome. The emperors did not listen to needs of the citizens, nor care about them. Therefore the citizens could not be handled, so the emperors limited their freedom. The Roman citizens did not agree or like their freedom being taken away, so they started rebellions, and many conflicts. They hated their government. When a government loses the support of their citizens, they lose tax revenue, power, and the control of their people. With weak emperors also come weak

Julius Caesar is perhaps the most well known in the history of Roman Emperors, yet there is no denying that his reign was filled with controversy, no reason more so than his devious rise to power and his mischievous ways of suppressing the senate. There is no doubt that in ruling as a Dictator; Caesar lost the support of the Roman people, who had fought for freedom against an Etruscan King, a role in which Caesar was playing. His death in 44BC coincided with what many believe to be the year in which the Republic completely its eventual ‘fall’ that it had been plummeting to since 133BC, and it is only by looking at the differences in the end of his reign to that of Augustus’ in 27BC that