How Soical Programs Are Bring Down the United States Economy Essay examples

The current (US) welfare reform consists of more than cash payment that the poor US citizen could bank on. There is a monthly payment that each poor person received in spite of their ability to work. The main people who received this payment were both mothers and children. Moreover, the payment does not have time limit and those people could not remain on the welfare for the rest of their live.

America spends an annual amount of 131.9 billion dollars on welfare alone (Department of Commerce). So many facts about welfare are overwhelming, such that over 12,800,000 Americans are on the welfare system. The entire social welfare system is in desperate need of a complete reform. In order for a proper reform to ensue, the people of America must combine efforts with the U.S. government to revitalize the current welfare system. This reform would involve answering two important questions. First, how has today’s welfare system strayed from its original state and secondly, how is the system abused by welfare holders in today’s economy?

That is equal to approximately 109,631,000 people. Not all people on Welfare abuse the advantages, most use the program the way that it was intended for, but in 2015, 10.1% of all Welfare payments were improper, meaning the recipient misuses the funds given. The 10.1% is equivalent to $71.5 billion and 11,072,731 people exploiting the system (federalsafetynet.com). To be using the money of people who work hard to earn a living, to be lazy is incomprehensible to me. Living off of other people who are working hard is not living, although the idea of not having to work and instead just be given money to spend on whatever you desire may seem enviable, it is the epitome of the “fun oriented” society. “Did the natural right to pursue happiness become somehow the right to get happiness and did that right inevitably degenerate into a right to have fun- for the simple reason that the impossibility of guaranteeing fun is less obvious than the impossibility of guaranteeing happiness?” (Can we survive the fun explosion?). There is a legitimate fear that the other millions of people not on Welfare will see how the other half living off Welfare will think that it is a viable option because they no longer have to put forth any pursuit for happiness. Their ticket to happiness is handed to them. Then our country will evolve into a crumbling mess because no one will be working to support

Welfare started as a temporary response to the economic crash in the 1930s. Its primary goal was to provide cushioning to the families who lost the ability to be self-sufficient during the Great Depression. Yet, as America slowly rose back to becoming prosperous and wealthy, a significant chunk of America's population stayed below in the transitioning social system. The welfare system started to become counterproductive to the government so that, in the 1990s, Clinton hastily came up with legislation to end welfare, more famously known as the Welfare Reform Act of 1996. This road that Clinton led ended in a downfall as more people than ever before are now dependent on the federal government for food, housing, and income. Our current welfare reform may need another reform before welfare can truly end.

There remains a remnant of citizens who honestly cannot do without the welfare system and who abide by the regulation of the welfare system, however, the system unintentionally invites scam artists. The ways of abusing the welfare system continuos to grow. Here are just a few of the examples. Citizens are staying single parents in order to receive aid. Parents view having more children as a gateway to receiving more money from the system. Recipients refuse to search for jobs and report employment in order to continue receiving assistance. People seem to easily make false claims, requesting assistance when they do not need it. Although, there is a set time period for receiving funds many citizens become comfortable and lazy during assistance. The whole purpose of the system is to get citizens through rough economical problems and back to a independent lifestyle without government aid. However, the systems seems to encourage complacency in society and provide fraud play in

Thousands of people are signed up to receive welfare in America, this program is designed to aid poor and needy families. However, it has become some people’s way of earning an income. Several argue against and say that welfare is not destroying our country and creating a dependent people who have learned to abuse certain privileges that come with living in this nation.

According to Ronald Reagan, “Welfare’s purpose should be to eliminate, as far as possible, the need for it’s own existence.” Welfare was originally created to provide help for struggling Americans that need food, healthcare, and education (Calonia). Over the years, welfare has become a dream come true for the people who “need assistance”, and a nightmare for taxpayers. Lethargic citizens of this country have found new ways to abuse welfare by taking advantage of federal student aid, food stamps, and even emergency room care. What happened to having a work ethic? Our generation wants everything handed to them on a silver platter. Americans need to understand that welfare has been abused for far too long and freeloaders need to stop treating

The U.S. reform effort suggests that the social welfare policy is most efficient at reducing poverty. “Federally funded and governed US welfare began in the 1930’s during the Great Depression.” [1] “A main goal of these reforms is to reduce the number of individuals or families’ dependent on government assistance and to assist the recipients in their efforts to become self-sufficient.” [2] Welfare was intended as a way to help people through a rough spot and are in greater need. It is for families living in poverty who need help to create financial stability. “The U.S. welfare state arguably emphasizes incentives to keep people employed, at whatever job and wage level, more than any other country.” (Drogus and Orvis 588) Every state has their

Many in the United States feel that they should not be “paying” for others, however the intention is not to pay for others, but more so create a social safety net that anyone can fall onto if need be. Efforts to fight poverty in the United States have been ongoing, the means of which the nation should address and aid the situation is controversial for some. In the creation of the New Deal policies and Social Security, there was an inherent racist nature behind the opposition for comprehensive and universal policies. The idea of a form of social security went against the beliefs some had against “big government. Because of this, many approached social policy with the mentality that because the market regulates itself, there should be no form of government intervention for when the market goes into crisis. We know this to not be true because of continual regulation of the market, either by government or business – at the end of the day, those who can afford to save themselves from crisis can do so and those who cannot are left to the demise of the market. Many argue that health care is an economic argument, I am not stating that it is not, but after looking at policy history, oppositions seem to be rooted in the social and

Welfare has been a safety net for many Americans, when the alternative for them is going without food and shelter. Over the years, the government has provided income for the unemployed, food assistance for the hungry, and health care for the poor. The federal government in the nineteenth century started to provide minimal benefits for the poor. During the twentieth century the United States federal government established a more substantial welfare system to help Americans when they most needed it. In 1996, welfare reform occurred under President Bill Clinton and it significantly changed the structure of welfare. Social Security has gone through significant change from FDR’s signing of the program into law to President George W. Bush’s

United States Government Welfare began in the 1930’s during the Great Depression. Franklin D. Roosevelt thought of this system as an aid for low-income families whose men were off to war, or injured while at war. The welfare system proved to be beneficial early on by giving families temporary aid, just enough to help them accommodate their family’s needs. Fast forward almost 90 years, and it has become apparent that this one once helpful system, has become flawed. Welfare itself and the ideologies it stands on, contains decent fundamentals; furthermore, this system of aid needs only to be reformed to better meet the needs of today’s society.

Throughout history, there have always been people willing to work for what they want, and those who expect things to be handed to them as if it was a natural-born right. While the welfare system does positively impact some families in need, many people take advantage of it. With this being a well known fact, the government still continues to use ten percent of the federal budget on welfare (“Budget” 1).

As an example people who are above poverty are given benefits of someone who is below poverty. Another problem is the lack of incentives in the program, and it undermines work. The program also puts penalties on marriage, which in turn hurts poor single mothers. Welfare benefits going to single parents with incomes less than half of the poverty levels have decreased within the past 20 years, whereas benefits to single parents making almost twice the poverty level have increased ("How Welfare"). The lack of incentives is an issue, because a good amount of welfare spending is federal, with the remainder contributed by states. However, states administer the programs and therefore have the capacity to contain welfare growth. Instead, states use their discretionary authority to expand welfare while at the same time under investing in anti-fraud activities. As a result, causing the program to be all over the place. The fact that Welfare just gives people an income and offering a generous system of entitlements to able-bodied adults without any obligation to work or prepare for work, welfare undermines the need and motivation for self-support. Welfare is primarily a system of one-way handouts. Only two out of more than 80 tested welfare programs include even modest work or training requirements ("How

Do some Social welfare programs perversely harm in the long run to the very people it is intended to help? In the United States, Social welfare or Welfare system is a way the Federal Government, and state governments provide assistance to individuals and families through programs such as health care, food stamps, unemployment compensation, housing assistance and child care assistance. Social programs are a broad collection of many programs, with corresponding mandates and complicated matters; it has poorly managed rules about eligibility, benefit level and subject to fraud, abuse and rising expenditure and moral hazard. From economist point of view, many scholars agreed welfare expenditure is one of the causes of the increasing debt in the nation’s budget deficit. Although it is not very significant if compared other programs, like Defense, which is about 18% of the 2014 GDP. The goal of this paper is to examine how Behavioral Economics Theory and the Neoclassical Model of Labor Supply undermine some of Welfare programs, since their negative effect greater than the positive effect, and this could get worst in the long run. It is argued that the size or transfer programs are responsible for a decline an economic performance, and economic growth directly or indirectly, since poor people who are mainly the workforce are more irrational and inclined to make bad choices. This applies especially to social transfer expenditure like social security, social assistance, and

In life things do not always go as planned, we run into some rough patches. For example, one can suddenly get fired from their job but that does not stop the bills from rolling in especially when there is a family to take care of, in situations like this financial help can really be useful. Welfare programs like the “ temporary assistance for needy families” purpose is give money to a group of parents and dependent children living together in a household. Another way that the government has been helping is by offering food stamps, food stamps provide a monthly wage to help keep the family in need feed. Unfortunately many will be cut off from food stamp in 2016 because the waivers have expired, as many as a million people will no longer receive it. There are those that believe government assistance is making a mistake with these welfare programs. After doing some research, their reason for feeling this way is because they think that it is making people in these programs more dependent saying “they will no longer wish to work because they won 't receive the profits gained from the governments help anymore.” Even though there are some that take advantage of the help they receive, helping the less fortunate is priority number one. Most forms of government welfare should not be abolished because it offers assistance for those in need.