Our Power to Change Hunger and Poverty Hunger and Poverty are two major issues in today’s world. Jessica Jackley and Josette Sheeran argued respectively these two topics in two TED talk videos. In 2010, Jessica speech focused on poverty, money and love, as her title mentions. In 2011, Josette talked about ending hunger now, as mention in her speech title as well. Both talks focused on strategies to assist the less fortunate. Even though they both approach their audience with rhetorical strategies, they both differentiate on how they use their speech techniques. Jackley and Sheeran both discussed logical solutions to alleviate poverty and hunger by using all elements of the rhetorical triangle, in which Jackley uses ethos and pathos more …show more content…
The ethos strategy helped Ms. Jackley’s speech, by allowing the audience to imagine a humble Jesus always helping those around him. In the case of Sheeran used of ethical reasoning was more in the approach of self-analyzing. In this scenario, the audience might not be able to analyze the questions and conclude that the answer is that society should care that hunger is a worldwide issue. It is evidently that an image of Jesus helping others will create a greater impact on the audience than just asking a question. With that said, It can be concluded that is important for the audience to have a standard example of ethical behavior, than just to ponder on the question of “Why should we care?” The other strategy used in this two speaches was pathos to reach the audience sympathy. In Ms. Jackley speech, she uses emotions to persuade the audience, by addressing the issue throughout her talk. As she tells the audience and states that she does not need to convince them to participate in her work by hearing “the ethical or moral reasons.”. As a matter of fact, she clearly states that the main reason that we are going to be convinced is because “we already care” (00:15:53-00:16:23). Given the fact that Jackley establishes that her purpose is not to convince the audience using ethical and moral reasoning, it creates a closer relation with her spectators. Jackey’s quote, allows the audience to feel that poverty exists and that it is acknowledged by the fact that we care.
The authors use of pathos in the essay is well planned and is used effectively. The see proof, the reader would have to look no further than the title of the essay: The Logic of Stupid Poor People. The word ‘stupid’ can be seen as a strong word towards someone or a group of people which stirs up emotion into some readers before they even start reading. It grabs interests and makes people want to hear what she has to say. When the author recalls of her past of being raised in a poor family, the author could also be using her stories to make the reader feel sympathy for her and understand the pressure that poor people are put under for them to be able to be considered for certain benefits and help in general. Another example of the author trying to appeal to the readers emotional side was how she concludes the essay with disregarding and opinions others have about the choice of poor people if they were not poor themselves. She states, “You have no idea what you would do if
People from all walks of life face many ethical dilemmas. These dilemmas have consequences. Our worldview determines how we deal with these dilemmas, and guides us to the right decisions. In this essay, I will examine an ethical issues through my Christian worldview. I will also present other viewpoints, and compare them to mine.
In Diana Georges “Changing the Face of Poverty”, she uses various examples of ads, brands, and organizations to show that the way poverty is portrayed has corrupted the understanding Americans have on poverty and what it really is. I agree with Diana George’s statement that the impression of poverty through visual imagery is distorted. Her essay examines many aspects of the misrepresentation of poverty. Society believes that they are doing more than what is actually being accomplished. The effect of her explanation allows for the audience to alter their opinion on the true image of poverty. Her use of real organizations within the community strengthens her approach.
In any powerful speech, the speaker communicates and relates directly to his or her audience. Elie Wiesel does a superb job of doing this in his Perils of Indifference speech, given in April 1999. His use of pathos
It was important for Thomas Paine to use pathos to persuade the audience because they needed to see a connection between their lives and the war. Thomas Paine talks about how the future of their children is so valuable and they need to fight right now for the happiness they
In the documentary “Poor Kids” you get to truly see and feel how it is to be a child that suffers from food insecurity, poverty and the rest that comes with it. The fact that this problem exists in a developed country that you would assume it could provide for all their citizens. Well, the reality is we have many families suffering because of lack food and on top of that, we have children suffering from lack and food and more. As a society, we have grown to just be concerned about ourselves and we don’t focus on issues that affect others. We fail to see the struggles of others because it doesn’t directly impact us. We are focused on attaining wealth at all cost we would rather waste food than provide help for the ones in need. Ultimately, we are creating policies that, make sure no one gives food to the ones that needed the most. It’s a sad reality that we must face in order to continue to strive as a nation. Therefore, we need to acknowledge others and provide them with the respect that they deserve. We also have many corporations and elites that have control, power, and wealth. The stratified system in the U.S is making it that much harder for lower-income families to come out of poverty. Not only are they suffering from lack of food, lack income, and resources, but this also is affecting their pride and self-worth.
How many of you see poverty and hunger as a problem in the world? How many of you think that you cannot possibly help solve this problem?
After reading the extensive “The New Face of Hunger” (Tracie McMillan), my eyes became more open to the overall issue of hunger, faced by many people today. In a few words, I was absolutely shocked by the true meaning and examples provided of what exactly food insecurity is. Honestly speaking, when I hear the word “hunger” I think of a human who has no food, living on the streets. “The New Face of hunger” brought to my attention that food insecurity is much more than simply having no food. In fact, “In 2006 the U.S. government replaced “hunger” with the term “food insecure” to describe any household where, sometime during the previous year, people didn’t have enough food to eat” (The New Face of Hunger). Not only was I able to see the harsh
According to Alan G. Gross and Arthur E. Walzer, ethos is a type of ethical appeal establishing the speaker’s credibility or character and expertise as persuasive techniques (…). Throughout, Evicted Matthew Desmond employs ethos to gain and reinforce his knowledge and expertise on the subject, to prove his reliability as a
The author uses pathos very frequently throughout the text to get her point across to the audience. In the text, Helen Keller mentions that, “For New York is great because of the open hand with which it responds to the needs of the weak and poor.” This quote demonstrates Keller's point that people in New York are a champion in helping so people of New York should want to give and help the needy, which carries an emotional appeal. In addition, Helen Keller says that, “The men and women for whom I speak are poor and weak in that they lack one of the chief weapons with which the human being fights his battle. But they must not on that account be sent to the rear. Much less must they be pensioned like disabled soldiers.” This also carries a very emotional point because she uses a metaphor
In our advertisement for Feeding America, my group appealed to our audience of classmates and Ms. Buescher through the relatability and necessity of proper nutrition. My group, consisting of Irene, Nia, and myself, spoke about hunger because we realized the importance of a proper diet and how our audience could understand the urgent necessity for hunger relief in America. Our audience may not have originally understood the scale of hunger in America, so we provided a statistic to show that one out of every eight people face hunger. This and other devices, such as the image, additional statistics, and textual explanation, were used to persuade the audience to donate to Feeding America.
Swift introduces his pamphlet and sets the setting with a couple of examples of pathos. He begins illustrating this concern with an image of a poor mother with her famishing children around her. Swift writes, “These mothers instead of being able to work for their honest livelihood, are forced to employ all their time in strolling to beg” (356). This example Swift included sets an emotional connection between the audience and the impoverished, so that the audience can feel empathy for them thus getting the audience to listen. If that wasn’t enough, Swift mentions how these innocent
In Janet Poppendieck's “Want Amid Plenty: From Hunger To Inequality” she argues that America puts excessive focus upon hunger issues among the poor when there are many other important issues that go unnoticed. Poppendieck believes that it is time to find a way to shift the discourse from undernutrition to unfairness, from hunger to inequality. In today's society, there are many food banks, food drives, soup kitchens, etc. Food is extremely abundant in America, therefore Poppendieck's statement is proven true when she states that there is too much focus on hunger. Throughout this text, she strongly supports her claims about hunger, equality, and poverty in general.
The circumstance surrounding her addresses concerning poverty is where the author makes an appeal to pathos. She states,“the poor
Richard Robbins explores and analyzes the creation and the upkeep of hunger in his book “Global Problems and the Culture of Capitalism. Each day, over a billion people in the world lack basic food needs. Common misunderstandings about world hunger are that it is the result of insufficient food production, famine is the common reason for hunger and that hunger is caused by overpopulation. Robbins argues against that theory and says that famines is not the leading cause of hunger and hunger is not due to overpopulation or insufficient food production. “Food production is not determined by the global need for food; it is determined on how many people have the means for it” (page 176). The documentary “The End of Poverty” reinforces Robbins belief that food is a commodity.