Hyper Attentive Summary

Technology in today's world affect everyone about the same since we can not live without. The amount of different activities and possibilities to do on the internet using different devices is immense . Whatever you want if it is food,games, or researching something anyone can receive in a matter of seconds. Tammy Kennon who is the author of , “ 5 New Brain Disorders that Were Born Out of the Digital Age” states the negatives about the technology devices that run the world. She tells us about how our patience, attention spans, and memory are all affected due to that fact that we are obsessed with electronics. In today’s world everyone relies on web searches like google to answer a question or do something for them. When a research was conducted by researchers they found out that”[O]ne -Third of them did not even try, reaching for google immediately” this shows how much people rely

In the article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid” by Nicholas Carr the thesis of the article is internet technology is altering our thought process. His article was featured in the Atlantic in 2008. In the article, Nicholas Carr says that he is not thinking the same and he cannot read like he used to. Now he loses concentration after reading two or three pages. He thinks this is happening because he has been spending a lot of time online. People can find things easily with Google so they do not have to look for it as much. Before people had to go to libraries to search for information but now they can just look for it online. His friends and acquaintances also said they are having similar problems. He says the longer people use the Web the harder it is for them to concentrate.

First of all, Carr has pointed out that technology is taking away our ability to concentrate and contemplate. Due to the great database of the Internet, Carr found out that everything has become easier for him as a writer: less time spending for research, watching videos and listening to podcast is convienient and fast,… But riding along with those convieniences is the inabilities to concentrate. With all the times he has spent on the Internet, Carr now finds it hard to immerse in a book or a lengthy article, and he also notices that his concentration oftens “starts to drift after two or three pages.” As Carr stated in his article, the Net seems to have “chipped away his capacity for concentration and contemplation,”and it made him realized that the way he is obtaining information now is no different from zipping along the surface on a Jet Ski. Carr believed that the old research

Many people are being distracted these days by the overuse of technology. It has become very difficult for people to focus on one task at a time. Also, people are forgetting some old ways of increasing their intelligence and ways of developing skills. In the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” By Nicholas Carr, he argues that internet restricts the minds from increasing our ability to fully understand what we read online. He also argues that spending “too much” time online causes to lose the focus and train our minds to think more like machines. Also, in the article “Why Gen-Y Johnny Can’t Read Nonverbal Cues” by Mark Bauerlein, he argues that people are less interactive because of the more use of texting and online chatting. He argues that

Reading linearly is the process of reading left to right from top to bottom. Nicholas Carr, the author of “The Shallows” writes about how technology is affecting our linear way of reading. Carr tells us how it used to be easy for him to immerse himself into a lengthy novel but now he finds his concentration starting to dwindle after only a short period of time. Carr also argues that we are losing our ability to think deeply because we are able to access such a plethora of information so easily. Research has found that technology over time has decreased our ability to read linearly. This research goes hand in hand to support Carr’s arguments in “The Shallows”. Along with the exponential decline in our ability to

To start, Tugend and Carr connect their texts through their similar use of pathos which conveys the notion that technology is harmful to the human brain. In order for Tugend to illustrate the effect multitasking with technology can cause, Tugend describe the feeling of, “desperately trying to keep up with multitude of jobs, we feel a constant low level of panic and guilt” (717). Many people feel overwhelmed after being hit with multiple thoughts or when other people simultaneously talking to them. This type of reaction has a very similar effect on

My mind now expects to take in information the way the Net distributes it: in a swiftly moving stream of particles.” By quickly reading information off the internet it changed the way he read. Instead of focusing on a piece of writing, he would just skim it. According to a Tarleton student I interviewed, he said it’s hard for him to multitask. For example, he said he can’t watch television and do his homework, because he would only focus on one or the other.

In “Attention Deficit: The Brain Syndrome of Our Era,” Richard Restak considers the effect of technology on our brains. As we process increasing amounts of information at ever-faster speeds, Restak argues that our brains are undergoing “profound alterations” in order to adapt to the changing needs of our modern world. As technology connects us to more people, places, and information than ever before, Restak warns that we are losing important cognitive functions, in particular our ability to focus and concentrate. However Restak fails to mention that technology has created significant affordances as well. Allowing society to advance as a whole, via social media, e-mail, cell phones, and other various communications. Technology is reshaping our habits of mind.Yes technology created a slight defect to the mind but many advantages came about using technology as an asset.

Students may easily lose their attention and concentration with easy access to such incredibly rich store of information. With such new technologies as television, internet and social networks, people nowadays tend to multitask more often as they have easy access to large amount of information. However, such easy access may sometimes be a distraction. Study report “Your Brain on Computers” shows that heavy multitaskers perform up to 20% worse on most tests compared to performance of light multitaskers. Working efficiency of people, who multitask, are claimed to be significantly lower. The same is with concentration. As a result, they are not engaged in working process. Students tend to be easily distracted with this situation. For example, combining doing homework with operating on Twitter, phone or YouTube results in poor engagement of a student into deep thinking process, according to Winifred Gallagher, who is the author of Rapt. He also points out that nowadays high school and college students have decreased capacity of serious thinking because of multitasking and distraction. Moreover, Tyler Cowen, economist and famous blogger, claims that nowadays information tends to come in shorter and smaller portions and that explains why our generation encourages short reading. Since online information is always presented in short written passages, the web prevents user from concentration and contemplation. As an illustration, Nicholas Carr, the speaker at MIT and Harvard,

The more the person multi-tasks the more easily distracted and ‘had less control over their attention’. This experiment was more comprehensive. To back up claims that the internet changes the way we think, Carr refers to an experiment done on primates in the 1970s and 1980s. The test seems extensive on how quickly our brains circuits responce can change based on our can experience. This doesn’t talk about how quickly the brain can therefore revert back when needed for more reflective activities such as when reading a book.

Richtel says that all of the data surrounding people affects their ability to focus because it makes them feel like they need to immediately respond to any information they receive. Technology has a huge influence on people’s lives, but that also comes with positive and negative

depict the ups and downs of a young child on a quest to become not

Social Learning Theory was developed by Ronald Akers in 1997 which takes into consideration the operant psychology which relies on the positive and negative consequences that a behavior holds when an action is committed. Akers argues that a behavior will be repeated if a positive reinforcement is applied. In regards to digital piracy, individuals will engage in downloading illegally downloading movies if other individuals will appreciate the action by providing monetary rewards or personal satisfaction. On the contrary, if the behavior has negative consequences then the individual will less likely commit it . For example, if an individual wants to engage in illegally downloading a software program but if he or she knowns that there would be

Matt Richtel, another journalist agrees that focusing has become harder with the increase in the use of technology. He suggests the reason is because of how we obtain the information. “Scientists say juggling email, phone calls and other incoming information can change how people think and behave. They say out ability to focus is being undermined by bursts of information. These play to a primitive impulse to respond to immediate

One of the greatest Soviet leaders, Mikhail Ivanovich Kalinin, once commented that teachers are the engineers of human souls. With the rise of globalization, an increasing number of students are choosing to study aboard, especially in the United Kingdom. The importance of keeping and improving the overall quality of teachers in the UK is therefore extremely significant. Apart from the level of job satisfaction that motivates teachers to continue improving, the reward system also exerts a strong influence on teachers’ behaviour at work. In accordance with ‘New Pay’ approach, strategic incentives play an important role in achieving business objectives (Lawler, 1995). On one hand, overall payment levels compared to other occupations is a motivating factor, whilst on the other the internal payment system affects teachers’ performance as well. This report will offer a thorough analysis of the reward system for teachers in England and Wales, beginning with an overview of the general situation on teachers’ salaries and followed by a discussion on tangible aspects including base pay, variable pay, benefits and pensions as well as intangible aspects like non-financial benefits. By presenting all this information and analysing it clearly, I will offer some suggestions aimed at enhancing the total reward system for teachers in England and Wales.