Executive Summary
IBM and Accenture are both huge companies and uses five factor DuPont analysis to achieve a return on equity. IBM has a higher return on equity than Accenture, and therefore the management are more efficient in generating shareholder value per dollar invested. However both the companies are performing better than the industry average. IBM does also take lesser number of days to convert cash on hand compared to Accenture and industry average. But, Accenture is taking more days than industry average on converting into cash. For the company’s credit rating we only consider the quantitative factors as it is difficult to get the in depth information on the qualitative factors. We consider the average of three years to get
…show more content…
This rise and fall for both the companies is due to the effect of five components in determining the ROE.
Tax Burden
This measures the effect of taxes on ROE. From the last past five years, there has been a rise in the tax burden for both IBM and Accenture, accounting to 71.9% in 2007 to 75.5% in 2011 and 47.5% in 2007 to 64.9% in 2011 respectively. However, Accenture is performing below the industry’s average of 68.7% in 2007 to 75.95% in 2011and IBM is more or less closer to the industry average. The increase in the tax burden in both the companies indicates that taxes declined as a percentage of pre-tax profits. This inclined in IBM is because net income margin improved 0.8 points to 14.9% in 2010 versus 2009 and 14.8% improvement in 2011 versus 2010 and due to increase in operating pre-tax income and margin of 1 points in 2010 versus 2009 and 0.3 points in 2011 versus 2010 and also the effective tax rate in 2011 was 24.5% which has been dropped from 24.8% in 2010 and again dropped from 26% in 2009. Also, the inclined tax burden in Accenture is also due to its effective tax rate of 27.3 % in 2011 that has been dropped from 29.3% in 2010.
Interest Burden
Interest burden for IBM in 2011 has been the minimum so far compared to the previous four years and for Accenture has inclined in 2011 from 2010. And both the companies are close to the industry’s average. Both IBM and Accenture have more than 100
Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jordan, B. D. (Eds.). (2011). Essentials of corporate finance (7th ed., Rev.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
1. Decompose IBM’s ROE (by quarter) and discuss the factors (and trends) that contribute to
Another factor we need to look at in our comparison is long-term debt and leverage. Times interest earned, debt to debt + equity ratio, and debt to total assets ratio are the focus of long-term debt and leverage. Times interest earned provides the relationship between the companies’s earning to cover interest payment and also ability to take in more debt. In calculations above, both companies are capable of paying back interest payments and take more debts. However, Boeing has higher ability to take in more debt and pay back interests comparing to Lockheed Martin. By further examine the long-term debt and leverage, debt to debt + equity and debt to total asset ratios must also be assess. These ratios will provide a comparison on the amount
Return on Total Assets was 4.43% which is below five percent. That indicates that the company is not accurately converting its assets into profit. The total for Return on Stockholders’ Equity was 8.89%, however financial analysts prefer ROE to range between 15-20 %. The company’s low ROE indicates that the company is not generating profit with new investments. Lastly, Debt-to-Equity ratio for the company was 1.01 which indicates that investors and creditors are equally sharing assets. In the view of creditors, they see a high ratio as a risk factor because it can indicate that investors are not investing due to the company’s overall performance. The totals of these three ratios demonstrate that the company’s financial state is not as healthy as it should be.
A financial performance comparison between Baldwin and Ferris during a three-year period can be determined by analyzing the financial data of both companies that include their stock price, dividends, earnings per share as well as their bond ratings. This analysis will focus on why the trends and changes occurred, and ultimately how decisions affected Baldwin’s performance and their impact in the company’s overall
In DuPont Analysis, the ROE is a product of three parts, the profit margin, which reflects its operating efficiency, asset turnover, which assess its asset use efficiency, and equity multiplier, which measures its financial leverage.
| The ROE decreased in the last year but still in the good margin of profitability.
In this paper, an analysis of Amazon’s financial position for the year ending 2015 has been conducted. Amazon’s Pro Forma financial statements for the 2016 and 2017 were generated so as to assess the future financial position of the company. When you look at the breakdown of the analysis of financial ratios, the Return on Equity (ROE) using the DuPont method of analysis and the
* A number of issues were identified in the analysis of the performance factor calculation. Management attempted to proxy the cost of equity using the bank prime lending rate plus 2%, which is a crude measure that is unlikely to reflect the true risk of the business. If the cost of equity is underestimated, the spread between ROE is inflated and the resulting market value of equity is overestimated.
Intel and Microsoft are perhaps the best known pair of complementary firms in the world. More than 80% of the personal computers worldwide ship with an Intel microprocessor running Microsoft’s Windows operating system. Since 1980, when IBM chose both Intel and Microsoft as the core components of the first IBM PC, Intel and Microsoft have been joined at the hip. In this paper, we tap recently available data revealed by the U.S. Department of Justice to explore the Intel-Microsoft relationship and model the dynamics of competition between complementary players. Contrary to the popular view that two tight complements will generally have well aligned incentives, we demonstrate that natural conflicts emerge overpricing, the timing of investments, and who captures the greatest value at different phases of product generations.
“Financial analysis consists of the quantitative and qualitative aspects of measuring the relative financial position among firms and industries” (Gibson, 2014, p.216). The analysis provided throughout this work will consist of a vertical and horizontal analysis of both the income statement and balance sheet for Halliburton Company. Based on the findings and assumptions made from the results of the data and investigation through the managers notes and other resource to conclude the reasons behind the results eight different ratios will be calculated and discussed as they relate to financial well being of Halliburton Company or financial flaws of the company as represented in the calculations and research. Once the vertical, horizontal, and eight financial ratios have been calculated, researched and discussed the calculation of Halliburton’s creditworthiness will be measured by Altman’s Z-score.
Investigating firm’s key statistics such as sales, ROIC, and free cash flow may not be enough to evaluate the company’s performance and future. “Macroeconomic indicators seem like excellent candidates as proxies of latent economic state variables because they influence both changes in firms’ cash flows and the risk-adjusted discount rate” (Gosnell & Nejadmalayeri, 2010). In fact, various economic indicators can strongly impact equity returns. However, it has been always difficult to establish this effect. Indeed, Chen, Roll, and Ross (1986) assessment of asset pricing is relevant today:
The relationship between corporation tax rates and profitability is both dynamic and complex. High statutory rates of corporation tax in the 1950s and 1960s were also synonymous with high levels of profitability. There was a secular decline in corporate profitability in the 1970s and 1980s due to increased competition from
After the announcement of increase in consumption Tax in April2014, by 5% to 8% the performance of corporate is highly impact due to demand
Zusammenfassung Der, auf einer Situationsanalyse der Fujitsu Siemens Computers GmbH (im Folgenden kurz: FSC) basierende, Bericht wurde im Rahmen des Learning Arrangement Unternehmensanalyse (P01_P8) angefertigt. Dem zu analysierenden