Identity And Identity Essay

Identity, the distinguishing of character and persona of an individual. Identity, the social construct that defines us as individuals. Self identity, the ideology in which the individual determines their own self worth. This seems like the idea to distinguish one’s own character; however it does apply to every human being. In many cases, including myself, it is society that is the main influence that molds the being. Its customs have impacted how these individuals think and behave in order for them to fit into its ideals, which can transform many to the point where they are living a totally different identity. Some of these individuals are boys and men who may not fit the perfect image of “masculine,” and may be ridiculed to the point where

Identity is a critical aspect of the growth and development in human beings. It is defined as a condition or character as to who a person or what a thing is; the qualities that distinguish or identify a person. Identity influenced by relationships is when the people one associates themselves with shape their identity. “Researchers posited that it is important to recognize the process of exploring and making commitments in interpersonal relationships is four domains: friendship, dating, sex roles, and recreation.” Relationships with friends, parents, and partners help influence an identity in a person. They each have a specific time where one is more important than the other. Each one shapes the person's identity, it could be for the better or for the worst. Parents are the first influence that a child has, then peers/friends become more important, and lastly partners help finish off shaping the person's identity. They each have a role in the

Identity, the fact of being who or what a person is, shapes a large part

The love, support and trust of others can have a huge impact upon an individual’s sense of identity. Other’s belief in us will empower a person

The issue of whether identity is socially constructed or an innate characteristic remains a contested one. For some, identity is a product of the society, interactions, influence, and practices while for others, it is biological or rather primordial. At the very basic, identity is an essential personal characteristics as it encompasses the membership to different groups, including religion, gender, and ethnicity, the traits people show and what others ascribe to them (Newman 126). Identity locates people in the social world and influences all their actions, thoughts, and feelings. Several renowned thinkers and philosophers offer their

Proposition 3 explains that identities can impact someone’s behavior and view on his or her life depending on how that person views an event that occurred in his or her life. Events can be looked at by examining if the event held a meaningful, personal experience to a person. Furthermore, this proposition explains that identities are socially interconnected to one another because someone’s identity can positively or

Our society expects people to behave a certain way, and because of this people work hard to portray themselves in a proper way to society. People work to create a strong self-image to portray; often a faucet of this self-identity includes a romantic partner. The original study was interested in investigating what role romantic relationships played in identity. The researchers look at the topic known as relationship visibility which can be best described as how relationship influences the self-image someone is projecting to the world. The original research strived to show a correlation between relationship visibility and attachment styles that was influenced by things such as self-esteem, the desire for more social status, and creating an identity (Emery, Muise, Dix, & Le, 2014). The objective of our current research is to further prove the original hypothesis: less secure attachment styles will lead to a desire for greater relationship visibility by replicating the original study.

Self Expansion Theory is one of the theories of identity in close relationship. It indicates that personal identities influences the development of close relationship after first impressions are made. The theory is evaluable in researches of close relationship because it focuses on the long-time dynamic development of close relationship. It discovers and explains that personal identities effect the relationship in long term.

Most of the adults in this world are involved in a romantic relationship or will be eventually. The most common romantic relationship includes the sexual dating relationship, the domestic partnership, and the marriage. The adults or partners involved in these relationships inevitably reach a point of conflict and how they react to the conflict can show whether the partners are a securely, avoidant, or anxious attached person. The securely attached adults usually have a positive view when dealing with relationship issues. Whereas, an avoidant attached adults are more hesitant and distance themselves from their partner. Adults who tend to be more emotional, jealous, and possessive and demand closeness have an anxious attachment. People should strive for the secure attachment style for the best satisfaction level, commitment level, and ability to adapt to change in their romantic relationship, that is what most of the adults have and most want their partner to be the same. Many theorist noticed that there tended to be a pattern with the attachment styles that people have as adults to what attachment style they had as children.

On the contrary, those who fail establishing intimate relationships retreat into loneliness and isolation (Nevid, 2012, p. 589). People who fail learning the basic sense of trust also have a greater fear of intimacy in early adulthood. Failure to achieve lifestyle goals in turn leads to role confusion. Lack of ego identity also leads to incompatibility in marriage relationships and higher rates of

In modernity, identity is often characterised in terms of mutual recognition, as if ones identity depended on recognition from others combined with self- validation of this recognition. Identity still comes from a pre set of roles and norms. For example, a mother or a catholic, identities are still limited and fixed, though I believe the boundaries of possible new identities are continually expanding.

Intimacy can be explored with an intimacy genogram to help show the family constellations that show a pattern (Sherman, 1993). A deterrent to intimacy in a relationship is fear, at many levels, such as fear of loss of power and fear of loss of self (Sherman, 1993). Fear can manifest from previous life experiences such as abuse or assault or it can be a manifestation of family-of origin influences. This fear can be manifested as individuals that do not have secure attachment styles and have difficulty expressing emotion through touch.

This includes their participation in the community, enjoying adult freedom and responsibilities and finding a committed relationship. If a person finds their personal identity, this will help in the development of future intimate relationships. It is important for people to accept and love themself in order to have a positive relationship with another.

A person’s life is made up of an impossibly unique combination of moments, interactions, and relationships, all of which amalgamate to create a human with an identity unlike any other in the world. When looking at a person’s life up close, it almost appears as if their identity is something that has been relatively constant throughout their life, however, if a person’s life is looked at a through a more holistic perspective, it’s easier to see how specific events, people, and relationships in their life made them who they are today. For this assignment, I was tasked with conducting in-depth interviews pertaining to life experiences and identities with another member of the class. Through the interview process, hidden sentiments arose, truths were revealed, and I had the opportunity to see the different ways in which my identity was formed. In analyzing these interviews, I found that through using the works of influential identity theorists, Daniel J. Canary, Michael J. Cody, Valerie L. Manusov, Jan E. Stets, and Peter J. Burke, I was able to dissect my interview and correlate specific instances of my past to aspects of my current identity, specifically my independent, self-assured, and open-minded disposition.

Recent trends in Psychology on Identity Theory: In the recent past identity is seen as a self-narrative which is held as the base for the construct of a person’s identity. The behaviour in salience to the social setting is the base of identity formation. The Identity Theory (Stryker 1968, 1980, 1989; Stryker and Serpe 1982, Mc Calls and Simmons 1978, R.H. Turner 1978) explains social behaviour in terms of the reciprocal relationship between the “self” and the “society”. The term is used to define the links between a multifaceted notion of the self and wider social structure. (Burke 1980; Mc Call and Simmons 1978; R.H. Turner 1978). It is an extension of the symbolic interactionist theory postulated by Mead (1934) and Blumer (1969) “that society influences social behaviour through its affects on the self” (Micheal A Hogg, et al.). However, the Identity theory rejects the symbolic interactionist theory as “relatively undifferentiated, co-operative whole” (Stryker 1980, 1987; Stryker and Serpe 1982) and argues that society is “complexly differentiated, but nevertheless organized” (Stryker and Serpe 1982:206) and thus predicated the idea of the