preview

In 12 different states, former ex-felons even after serving their term have a large chance on

Decent Essays

In 12 different states, former ex-felons even after serving their term have a large chance on losing their voting rights for good; don’t you think that is too harsh? 19 states give the ex-felons a chance to redeem their rights after their term of incarceration, parole, and probation, while another 19 states give their rights back after their term is up. In this case you can conclude that no matter how large or small the charge, the ex-felon was convicted of that their rights for voting should not simply be given back to them after their term, although the ex-felons should have the right to earn back their legal, vote it should not be that easy. The NAACP is talking to the U.N. to make sure all former convicted felons in the United …show more content…

If they are elected eligible to vote by the “jury” or whoever decides, their vote should be submitted and counted as every citizens should, because of constitutional rights. But for any other former inmate they should be allowed to cast a vote come voting day with little to no problems, because they are a free American who deserves a say in who runs office not that they are no longer an inmate. Rep. Jim Glenn supports a new bill that has been purposed in Virginia that would automatically restore rights to most felons after they completed their sentence and parole. “Once you pay your price to society and reimburse the people you’ve committed the crime against, you should be given your rights back” (Jim Glenn). He feels like as long as it’s not Murder, the crime that the former inmate had committed is not large enough to take away their voting rights. Another view on this topic comes from (Jessica Brady) stating that naturalized voters must simply pass a language test to earn back their voting rights. Either way you look at this topic the opinions will be varied. The bulk of my gathered sources support inmate voting after their term is up to the exception of murder. I agree with these sources because it’s the fair way to go, if the inmates had been elected to lose their voting rights for good like in Kentucky and Virginia the sense of being free from prison wouldn’t be the same. If an ex-inmate is out of jail he or she should

Get Access