preview

In The Rubber Coils Ankomah And Sambourne

Good Essays

Most can agree that the reigning of King Leopold II over congo was a very brutal period in history. From genocides to the cutting of limbs, it truly did not leave a good impression. Over the course of time, many have been so interested in this event that they have written essays, drawn illustrations, and even produced documentaries about this time in history. Two people of this group are Baffour Ankomah, writer of the essay Butcher of Congo, and Linley Sambourne, illustrator of In the Rubber Coils. In Ankomah’s essay, he thoroughly discusses several points that relate to King Leopold, and how vicious he was to the Africans of Congo. Meanwhile in Sambourne’s illustration, she focuses on the vicious, snapping ‘snake’, King Leopold, and how vicious …show more content…

Sambourne illustration was definitely powerful, but not so when compared to Butcher of Congo. Though it did accurately show how hard it was to be an African under the rule of King Leopold the ‘snake’, it did not provide the reader with sufficient information as to why it was brutal. This is one of the main things that can already confuse the reader if this image was approached with no background information whatsoever. Ankomah was most likely aware of this situation, which is why he made sure to outline the basics. With this done, he was able to smoothly discuss his points, which included the same thing that Sambourne was trying to prove, which was that King Leopold treated the Africans of Congo brutally. The viewer of this illustration missed out on the details about why King Leopold was bad, one of which was that he wanted the Africans to produce enough rubber, which could later be transported through the great Nzere river. The viewer of this image might have also not been to sure as to why, out of all things, Sambourne chose King Leopold the snake to be squeezing the African. For all we know, the squeezing could have been representing the slave chains that tortured Africans, but because we are not given enough information, the reader might get a different idea, which could be something like thinking that King Leopold released snakes on the Africans. The squeezing could have also been symbolizing the “hostages” or “starving porters”, or even the chicotte that “left permanent scars”. The viewer may have had a more simple thought of this picture, perhaps even no clue if he or she did not have knowledge of King Leopold and Congo. Without background information, the reader is not sure if Sambourne was only trying to prove that King Leopold was a cruel ruler. Because one has to assume so, Sambourne appeals to be biased towards King Leopold. Sambourne did not

Get Access