preview

Into The Wild Chris Mccandless Compare And Contrast

Decent Essays

Krakauer wants the reader to understand that Chris McCandless has similarities and differences with other people who have comparable stories involving Alaska. In chapter eight, Krakauer states common traits between him and four past Alaskan trekkers: “Like Rosellini and Waterman, McCandless was a seeker and had an impractical fascination with the harsh side of nature. Like Waterman and McCunn, he displayed a staggering paucity of common sense”. However, the author also states how McCandless is unique: “But unlike Waterman, McCandless wasn’t mentally ill. And unlike McCunn, he didn’t go into the bush assuming someone would automatically appear to save to save his bacon before he came to grief”. In chapter nine, Krakauer tells the story …show more content…

The critics from the beginning of chapter eight were therefore too quick to judge McCandless’ abilities in the Wilderness and were unaware of his full story Into the Wild Journal 2: Ch. 14­15 These chapters explain Krakauer’s personal journey by telling his backstory and its significance when discussing McCandless’ journey in Alaska. The author states that his suspicions of McCandless’ death being an accident comes from a “more personal perspective”. He begins with his relationship with his father, a similarly strained relationship, like McCandless and his father. Although they were pressured greatly by their fathers to excel academically, both of them ended up in climbing in Alaska. Krakauer continues his backstory by retelling his treacherous climb up the Devil’s Thumb, illustrating his fear when faced with a daunting task. The author realizes that his surviving of his trip in Alaska and McCandless’ death in Alaska

Get Access