preview

Is Wilfred Owen's Contradiction To The Glorification Of War

Good Essays

Wilfred Owen, in his poem Dulce et Decorum Est presents war as pointless, torturous and uncertain. He makes it clear that he finds the idea of war over-glorified, this he conveys by recounting what could be his own experience as Owen was a Soldier fighting in World War I. To communicate his contradiction to the glorification of war, he portrays its harsh reality in a first person perspective. He also references two other poets within Dulce et Decorum Est; Horace and Jessie Pope - the latter at whom this poem is directed.

Even in the title, the tone of the poem hints at bitterness and irony. Dulce et Decorum Est, a Latin phrase, is the first half of the complete saying; dulce et decorum est pro patria mori. Written originally by Roman poet, …show more content…

Propaganda at this time created illusions of honorable, glorious soldiers who fight and die for their country however, by comparing soldiers to disrespected, unimportant members of society - “beggars” - Owen mocks this concept. His use of this simile to create such a contrast seems bitter as it suggests that this glorification of war is a gross lie. Expanding on this point, in the last stanza, Owen focuses on the agony of one soldier from the narrator’s point of view. The focus on the treatment of one soldier in the war carries a suggestion on what they all went through. Though the soldier affected by the gas and dying is in obvious torment, as is described by Owen by appealing to a reader's different senses, he is “flung” into a wagon. The harrowing imagery of the soldier dying is created as Owen uses the present tense, continuous verbs “writhing” and “gargling”. Used to describe the actions of the soldier and the sound of him bleeding, respectively, this engages the reader's’ senses of sight and sound causing them to feel pity for the soldier as they feel as though they themselves are present at the scene. However, though you would expect this man to be treated with care and respect, the past tense verb “flung”, used to describe how they handled him, suggests carelessness - thus creating juxtaposition. In describing such casual, careless treatment …show more content…

This image contrasts with the healthy, vivacious men who must have entered the war therefore creating the bitter tone. Furthermore, this tone is secured by Owen’s use of a simile to compare the soldiers to “hags”. Connotations of describing them as such include old age - this implies that the physically young men have been aged artificially by the unnatural atrocity of war.
Furthermore, to support this point, in the first stanza, Owen uses the verb “haunting” to describe the “flares” on which they “turned their backs”. An extremely emotive word, “haunting” describes an action that is continuous and in the present while also having connotations of the fear of something that is beyond human power. This use of the present tense would immerse readers in the poem, giving them an attachment to it since even though these events happened a century ago they do still haunt the world today.
“Flares” would be used to illuminate targets and therefore some of the most gruesome moments in war (when the target is hit) - it can be inferred that the soldiers are haunted by these images and will continue to be far into the future. However, for that moment, within the war, they are so used to death that they are able to “turn their backs” on

Get Access