1)
A: I agree with Jenkins statement of "It 's not a moment of perfect American moral clarity" because Efimova did not mean for the medication she took to stay in her system for a long period of time. Widely shaming Efimova at the Rio Olympics because she took suggested medication a while back was not right on the American swimmer King and audiences parts. When the American swimmer Jessica Hardy had taken a enhancement that was forbidden she was not treated as an outsider. When stories are misinterpreted or manipulated that should not turn to shamming other people, especially if you do not know the entire actuality. What King perhaps did not recognize was that Efimova had went to her physician and was recommended medicine that would potentially help her heart and general health. Europeans trust that too much severe training can damage your well being. Going back to WADA’s outlawing of Meldonium, she very well might have obeyed the guidelines, but the truth being, there is no certain amount of time it takes for the medication to get out of your system. B: When Carter spoke about the football situation he described the football player “not catching the ball but making it seem like he did by celebrating” he said that the football player had a choice. A choice to lie or be truthful. He misled the referee by celebrating when getting up from the ground. The football player had a choice to be straightforward or lie and he decided to lie. Our ethics say that “lying is immoral and
A. (2.) Analyze the ethical issues at stake in the scenario and distinguish from legal matters.
American history has had many defining moments over the last five decades which has helped America to develop to the way it is today. Each decade holding many life changing events and discoveries in them it would take a long time to cover each and every one of these so I have chosen a major event that I find to be of great worth to Americans today. We can all learn from the past events and work together to make American a safer and better place to live, and one way to do so is by learning from the past. Starting in the 1950’s we will discuss the most life changing and breath taking moments from each decade that this great county has seen through the 90’s and discover why they are all of significant value to the America we all live in
The Intelligence Square U.S. held a debate about whether or not the government’s rules on performance enhancing drugs should be ban in professional sports. For the debate they had Radley Balko, Investigative Journalist, Norman Fost, Professor of Pediatrics and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin, and Julian Savulescu, Uehiro Professor of Practical Ethics at the University of Oxford argue for the motion. They argue the fact that the medicines we take on a daily basis from the pharmacy are also performance enhancers. This goes back all the way to the Romans who once used herbs to improve themselves for battle, making them believe that the only exception that separates this from steroids is that it is illegal. On the other hand, you have
All this has changed the whole course of doping. Drugs used to be taken just for a one-off effect which activated various standard bodily functions, but now they may bring about the biological reprogramming of the body. To put it plainly, the time is not far off when it will be scientifically possible to make artificial but lasting changes in the way an organ functions and when the technicians of sport will be able to change each drug to meet the specifications for a particular level of performance.
"I am sorry for disappointing you all in so many ways." This drug unfairly enhanced her performance on the track but, didn't allow her to recover from her normal workouts like she used to. She used tetrahydrogestrinone, also known as THG which is a powerful anabolic steroid. Many track athletes and runners have been caught using it. The biggest consequence is is perhaps not even getting the medals taken away, but the disappointment and sadness from friends, family, and coaches that believed in her. America cheered for her in the Olympics. By using steroids she let America down. Not to mention drug use is against the law. Marion Jones was sentenced to 6 months in
Next, you heard from Morgan Pearce, Jordan Simon's best friend throughout high school. Morgan testified to the increasingly extensive amount of time Jordan Simon spent with Coach Swift. Even so, Morgan was able to testify to Jordan's increased strength, lack of focus in class, headaches, and mood swings. Ladies and gentlemen, if Morgan was able to recognize these signs of Jordan's steroid abuse, then why did Coach Swift, who spent a significantly greater amount of time with Jordan than even her best friend, neglect to speak up about these symptoms? Even after Jordan fainted in Coach Swift's practice right in front of him, Terry Swift neglected to call for emergency help. Ms. Pearce testified that Coach Swift became advised Jordan to call Leonia Hamline, a known EPO user, about what it takes to be a champion. As
The desire to compete — and win — is as old as history itself. From the beginnings of sport, athletes have sought out foods and potions to turn their bodies into winning machines. As early as 776 BCE, the very first Olympic games, there are records of attempts to increase testosterone levels (“Steroid Abuse in Sports”). Ancient Greek wrestlers ate vast amounts of meat to gain muscle mass, and Norse “Berserker” warriors took hallucinogenic mushrooms before battle. The first competitive athletes to be charged for doping, however, were swimmers in 1860s Amsterdam. Doping of all kinds, from caffeine to cocaine to anabolics quickly spread to other sports (“Anabolic Steroids, a Brief History”).
Which of the five scenarios in Ethics Quiz #2 was the most difficult? What was your thought process in coming up with your answer?
Yes, the information in the headnote describing the author's, Michael Dillingham, qualifications persuades me to side with his opinion. Why? Simply because he is a well-educated individual. Furthermore, he has most likely spent many hours looking into the dangers of steroids and other substances abused by athletes. Personally, I believe that the term "applied ethics" means that a person holds their self to a certain moral standard every day of their life. It implies that the audience has certain moral standards since they are visiting a website that is devoted to "applied ethics". When the author says, "the inmates are running the asylum", I believe he means that these athletes can do whatever they choose to do. Michael Dillingham, the author,
Performance enhancing drugs, specifically steroids, have a long history in sports and the United States. As a research shows while the first unofficial anabolic steroid was produced in 1935 (isolated testosterone), it wasn’t until 1936 that its use became popularized as a way to enhance athletic performance. German athletes were rumored to have used this testosterone in the 1936 Berlin Olympics, but the lack of documentation as well as well known Nazi anti-steroid sentiment has made it difficult to verify such claims (Yesalis, 2000, p.52). It is this sentiment that began the early stages of the modern “anti-steroid epidemic,” with the belief that athletes should be successful due to inherent talent (in the Nazi ideal, genetic fitness), not medicinal enhancement. Despite some public dissatisfaction, Soviet
Execution improving medication is characterized as a substance that is utilized to furnish competitors with advantage in athletic execution. A thought that necessities illumination is doping can be characterize as substance that competitor's takes in any new frame to the body utilized pick up leeway in athletic execution. Another thought needs illumination is that of decency itself, particularly the thought when a competitor is conning. The allegation is that when competitors takes execution improving medications it is a type of bamboozling, that is uncalled for to the competitors when don't utilize PEDs. A portion of the exhibitions upgrading drug use by competitors are stimulants and torment concealments. Anabolic specialists are utilized by competitors for muscle building. Anabolic specialists are additionally utilized as preparing helps by competitors. A few competitors take anabolic specialists to recuperation from prepare loads. Competitors some time take a few distinct composes execution upgrading drugs. Diuretics used to control weight and Peptides are taken by competitors for some, extraordinary reason. Peptides are additionally utilized in light of the fact that it is hard to recognize. Competitors take diuretics when they need to shed pounds rapidly. Competitors have known about the advantages that originate from blood doping. A few competitors utilize
The case stipulates that dextroamphetamine is the only medication that Cindy can use and that the United States Gymnastics Guild (USGG) has granted her an exemption .The USGG granted the exemption based on Cindy following the doctor recommended dosage. As director of the International gymnastics guild (IGG), Juan has a difficult decision to make regarding Cindy’s eligibility for the IGG World Championships. The status of .dextroamphetamine as a performance enhancer is unclear but if Juan allows her to compete, she could possibly have an unfair advantage over other gymnasts. On the other hand, If Juan
This is a material world promoting material values, thus meaning that it should not be surprising to see individuals being willing to do everything in their power in order to make profits. Or should it? The sports community today is troubled by a series of athletes who have yielded to society's pressures and abandoned their principles with the purpose of taking performance enhancing drugs. It is difficult to determine if it would be normal for the masses to judge these individuals, concerning that they are actually one of the reasons for which these people have come to consider taking performance enhancing drugs in the first place. However, the only ones who can judge them are other hard-working sportspersons who have stood by their principles and who respect the idea of sport in general.
‘Olympic track star Marion Jones was sentenced in a federal court to six months in prison.’ (Kelly and Rao, 2008) The reason why Jones was guilty is because of the use of performance enhancing drugs since 1999. More and more famous athletes prove to have used banned drugs to enhance their performance. At the same time, the role that the anti-doping agency is more and more important in the world wide games, such as Olympic Game, Tour de France. Nowadays, whether the performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) should be legalized has sparked a heated debate. However, the use of PEDs is morally wrong and it should be banned in sports. This essay will demonstrate three main points which explain the
The scene is set. It is 2016 in Rio de Janeiro, and the final heat of the Olympics is about to commence. The sprinters have been training their entire lives for the opportunity at hand, and the outcome of the most important event of their lives is going to come down to mere milliseconds. With a gold medal on the line, these athletes will be looking for any advantage they can get, whether big or small. One direction these athletes turn for an advantage is supplements. Supplements have emerged as a way for athletes to increase their performance, yet their use is very controversial. Supplements, varying from simple multivitamins to complex chemical supplements, are used by almost every athlete, whether recreational or professional,