preview

Ivan Ilych And The Book Thief

Decent Essays

The Book Thief and The Death of Ivan Ilych explicitly explore the theme of death, yet they also display underlying themes of freedom and living. Holistically, these texts prove how crucial freedom is in order to live a fulfilled life. The characters of Max Vandenburg and Ivan Ilych illustrate this within their restricting circumstances, in doubts of whether these characters have truly lived their lives, and in the way Ivan Ilych and Liesel Meminger reflect on their lives. The importance of freedom is proved within these texts, and together they pose the question of, “What is living?”

Despite Max Vandenburg and Ivan Ilych’s differing circumstances, their freedom was affected in similar ways. Set in the midst of World War II, The Book Thief …show more content…

Max hid in the Hubermann’s basement to stay alive, but the life he was living was one full of fear, guilt, and isolation – “What great malice there could be in allowing something to live,” (Zusak, 2005, page 170). He was burdened by the thought of hurting the Hubermanns, and filled with regret and guilt for leaving his loved ones behind. With a life full of pain, why would Max still be fighting to live? According to the book ‘The Order of Terror’, written from the firsthand experience of a Jewish person in a Concentration Camp, “those who had weathered painful past experiences… believed that harrowing times would be followed by more favourable circumstances,” (Sofsky, 1997, page 88). Max was evidently hopeful, but he was just living each day waiting for freedom. In contrast, Ivan Ilych had freedom to live his life, yet he never believed life should be anything more than, “most simple and most ordinary,” (Tolstoy, 1886, page 11). Ivan lived a lacklustre life. He was free to make his life exciting, yet refused to truly live. Ivan felt as if he was happy with his life, yet as he came to his deathbed, unable to take control of his life and freedom, he became full of regret. According to the ‘Psychology of Freedom’, people are healthier, happier, and more in control of their lives under conditions of freedom (Presley, S. 2017). Ivan believed he was …show more content…

Ivan Ilych’s life was conventional and simple; it was not until he fell ill that he began to realise his existence was potentially meaningless. As he is on the verge of death, he looks back on his happiest times, and “in imagination he began to recall the best moments of his pleasant life. But strange to say none of those best moments of his pleasant life now seemed at all what they had then seemed,” (Tolstoy, 1886, page 50). All the days Ivan thought were his best days were seemingly meaningless. Ivan’s response to his life was that he had done something wrong; ““Maybe I did not live as I ought to have done,” it suddenly occurred to him. “But how could that be, when I did everything properly?”” (Tolstoy, 1886, page 51). Liesel’s life was the opposite of his; it was not easy or pleasant, nor was it ordinary. Throughout her life, Liesel lost those she loved most, and suffered through heartache. Yet, as she died, the author infers that Liesel did not regret her life. As she passes away, Death describes her soul as sitting up, just like her papa’s – “[his soul rose] up and [said] “I know who you are, and I am ready,” (Zusak, 2005, page 566). It has been inferred here that Liesel embraced her life, despite the hardships she faced. Ivan Ilych, in contrast, lived a life he came to

Get Access