preview

Jane Eyre Heteronorsexuality Analysis

Better Essays

Challenging Heteronormativity: Jane Austine’s Pride and Prejudice and Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre

I argue that the main characters Elizabeth Bennet and Jane Eyre in Pride and Prejudice and Jane Eyre of Jane Austin and Charlotte Bronte respectively challenges the patriarchal roles set to them by their heteronormativity societies. Both characters embody the views and beliefs of the writers.
“I understand heteronormativity to refer to those norms related to gender and sexuality which keep in place patriarchy and compulsory heterosexuality as well as other systems and ideologies related to power such religious fundamentalism, casteism, and the class system and so on.”(Jolly Jaya Sharma’s Reflections on the Construction of Heteronormativity’ …show more content…

This statement showed how heteronormativity is framed in the society of Elizabeth and Austin herself—that a wife is for each man. A compulsory heterosexuality roles. Austin lives during Regency period which is from the 16th to the 19th century and that wealth was accumulated primarily on land ownership. Jane Austen herself is a member of the educated middle class known as “gentry” like the Bennets in her novel. Moreover, the novel showed detailed description of highly formalized manners both for men and women. In Regency era, a woman is considered to be an accomplished lady if she has mastered etiquette, is sharp minded and has good disposition in addition to beauty. Elizabeth is not nearly an accomplished woman. She is unconventional. “My fingers,” said Elizabeth, “do not move over this instrument in the masterly manner which I see so many women’s do. They have not the same force or rapidity, and do not produce the same expression. But then I have always supposed it to be my own fault – because I would not take the trouble of practicing. With this in mind and behavior, Elizabeth is less favored by her mother among other siblings. Seemingly unable to marry Jane to prospective wealthy man, her mother sets her eyes to other siblings of Jane to market for marriage. This clearly suggest that financial security of women in …show more content…

Yet, she of the same nature challenged the patriarchal roles of her society. Jane’s life in the Lowood Institute was not well under the supervision of Mr. Brocklehurst. The leadership of a man may not always follow to be always be a successful one and that the character of Miss Temple was a precursor of Jane’s defiance to patriarchal leadership. Through Mr. Brocklehurst and Miss Temple, she was able to make a distinct comparisons of other sexes. Moreover, even though the Industrial Revolution opened other venue for lower-class women society yet the society offered only a respectable employment such as working as a governess, Jane’s job. The society did not offer much more for women no matter how learned could she be. Although to note, the position of a governess during Bronte’s time is not likely as presented in the novel. “Women are supposed to be very calm generally: but women feel just as men feel; they need exercise for their faculties, and a field for their efforts, as much as their brothers do; they suffer from too rigid a restraint, to absolute a stagnation, precisely as men would suffer; and it is narrow-minded in their more privileged fellow-creatures to say that they ought to confine themselves to making puddings and knitting stockings, to playing on the piano and embroidering

Get Access